144

New: Bidenworld explodes at Harris over the book excerpt after years of simmering tensions. "Vice President Harris was simply not good at the job," said one former Biden White House official. "She had basically zero substantive role in any of the administration's key work streams, and instead would just dive bomb in for stilted photo ops that exposed how out of depth she was."

Biden is "not the reason she struggled in office or tanked her 2019 [presidential] campaign," the ex-official said. "Or lost the 2024 campaign, for that matter. The independent variable there is the vice president, not Biden or his aides."

Oh no, mommy and daddy are doing liberal infighting. clown-to-clown-communicationclown-to-clown-conversation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 103 points 4 months ago

No, Biden very clearly was fundamental to the 2024 loss.

Now, if she had been able to run a full campaign, if he had stepped aside from the very start, then yes we'd probably still be here today with Trump in office. But she was not given the space to fail on her own merits.

[-] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 82 points 4 months ago

Absolutely, the person who got like 3% of the Dem primary vote had horrendous popularity, but Biden also made absolute sure she wouldn't even be allowed to fail on her own merits.

[-] livejamie@lemmy.zip 53 points 4 months ago

I lived in Oakland during that time, and she didn't even win there. I remember seeing graffiti of her as a cop.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 4 months ago

Iirc in 2020 primaries Biden was also doing like shit until all the ghouls pooled their cementary electorate on him in order to stop Bernie.

[-] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 30 points 4 months ago

they gave her the old glass cliff treatment but she would've certainly also failed on her own merits so i'm not sure it counts

[-] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 4 months ago

she had built up some good momentum for a while. she sabotaged herself leading up to the election. i think she failed on her own merits

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 4 months ago

She or her advisors decided to abandon anything that was popular or made her look good

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 4 months ago

They definitely added to it

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

She had good momentum for a week, tops. Basically until she started speaking. So, arguably her own merits.

[-] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

She had momentum right after the Walz pick and people thought “oh so she might actually do something good for a change”. Walz was unintentionally showing her up so they muzzled him and brought in Liz fucking Cheney as her unofficial VP, and the rest is history.

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

The fact that "Send in the National Guard" Walz was more popular than her speaks volumes lol

[-] purpleworm@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

The fact that she almost succeeded and fucked up doesn't change that her chances were severely sabotaged

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
144 points (100.0% liked)

news

24576 readers
523 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS