[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

With sparkles! It's illustrative. I'm not doing an analysis of the entire supply ecosystem for a one sentence post.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

More like 58k after taxes. And you won't find me arguing against the fact that we're in an affordability crisis. 58k should get you a house or the pay should be enough to get a house. But that goes for everyone in the working class, not just garbage collectors.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

If we get into value added along the chain then yeah. I was assuming the company or whoever had already paid out the suppliers.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Oops, I pushed a patch. Controlling the service is the ultimate Man In The Middle attack.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Would you be surprised to learn that a lot of those guys are making 65k with union benefits?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Fun math, assuming 3 million man hours to design, test, and bring a car to production and 35 hours to build the actual car, a 200k unit run would work out to 50 hours per car.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Are memories really that short? If you keep giving them help while they spit on you every chance they get then you're just helping them. They blocked Obama and then had their candidates straight up lie to congress. There is a very strong case for not giving them the time of day much less a hearing in the Senate.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

A pardon requires an admission of guilt. An admission which would violate the good behavior clause of the Constitution. Meaning he's no longer eligible to be on the court.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago

I've got to say it. This is a case the Biden DOJ could have brought too. And Obama. The Democrats have got to stop playing games. They should have immediately changed it up when Obama was denied justice picks.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

So, a bathroom ban for the entire UK?

Did you guys see the US speed running a regression arc and decide to try your hand at it?

13

The problem I'm struggling with is combat that's too easy. I usually have 6 or 7 players and battles are written for 4 or 5. At some point the sheer action economy means the fights are too easy. So I'm looking for a way to make fights more dangerous without straight up killing low level adventurers (going unconscious is fine, I just generally don't kill players until mid levels) and without making combat take a long time.

So far I've tried;

Extra HP, which turned into a slap fight. Players and baddies just rolling to hit over and over. It takes longer and is boring.

Adding Enemies, this can induce a feeling of danger but as with the extra HP it takes longer because the party still has to chew through the extra HP.

Extra Damage, the most promising so far but very hard to balance. It's easy to overtune it and make a fight impossible for a party. But it doesn't affect time as much and it's been the most popular so far.

Ideas I want to try include;

Replacing a baddie with a spellcaster or adding one. This would hopefully not drag the fight out, but would require dynamic thinking, especially if extra damage is in play for the martial enemies.

Wave fights, it's easier to control for time, and I could delay a wave to give them healing time. If things are going long the extra waves just don't appear.

Control as swarms, this could probably really cut time down but if one roll misses than all attacks from the grouping miss. Which might play into the action economy problem I'm already facing.

3 round anti heroes, choose one or several enemies to stay up for 3 rounds no matter what. Record their damage and kill them off as they get hit in the fourth round if they hit zero. But allow them to remain conscious for 3 rounds. But I wouldn't be able to give updates on their health to the players. Maybe I could communicate they special status instead, like glowing eyes, or an aura of zeal.

Any other ideas are welcome!

311
Void Kittens (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by Maggoty@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world
1

A CBS News investigation found dozens of law enforcement leaders — sheriffs, captains, lieutenants, chiefs of police — buying and illegally selling firearms, even weapons of war, across 23 U.S. states, Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., from the Deep South to the Midwest, Northeast and California coast. 

167
submitted 1 year ago by Maggoty@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A CBS News investigation found dozens of law enforcement leaders — sheriffs, captains, lieutenants, chiefs of police — buying and illegally selling firearms, even weapons of war, across 23 U.S. states, Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., from the Deep South to the Midwest, Northeast and California coast.

86

That's it, include a link of course but otherwise it's unchanged.

31

Several people pointed out that our rules for behavior weren't immediately apparent. While I would say this shouldn't be an issue in a community about posting new communities, I have been proven wrong on multiple occasions. So I have made the list in our sidebar. These are a paraphrasing of Mastodon.World's rules. So there is no functional change. We will continue to use their rules as a master list. But they boil down to being civil. If you don't like something or someone and have no constructive criticism, then you just move on.

I'm going to put changes here as well so people on apps can see them easier.

The rules for behavior are a straight carry over of Mastodon.World’s rules. You can click the link but we’ve reposted them here in brief, as a guideline. We will continue to use the Mastodon.World rules as the master list. Over all, be nice to each other and remember this isn’t a community built around debate. For the rules about formatting your posts, scroll down to number 2.

  1. Follow the rules of Mastodon.world, which can be found here.(link)

A. Provide an inclusive and supportive environment. This means if it isn’t rule breaking and we can’t be supportive to them then we probably shouldn’t engage.

B. No illegal content.

C. Use content warnings where appropriate. This means mark your submissions NSFW if need be.

D. No uncivil behavior. This includes, but is not limited to: Name Calling; Bullying; Trolling; Disruptive Commenting; or Personal Criticisms.

E. No Harrassment. As an example in relation to Transgender people this includes, deadnaming, misgendering, and promotion of conversion therapy. Similarly Misogyny, Misandry, and Racism are also banned here.

72

Guys I understand there's big stuff going on in the world. This community though is really just about finding other communities. For now, on the theory that people kind of forgot where they were, some temp bans were handed out. I have no pretensions of this being c/news or something. But I also have no pretensions of this being c/news. It is absolutely beyond the pale to post your political broadsides here while people are trying to figure out the best place to have their community. The only way politics is acceptable here is if you're talking about opening or moving a community about politics or because of politics. And it should absolutely remain civil. A simple, "I don't like your ideology", is enough here.

50
submitted 2 years ago by Maggoty@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Here we go again.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 225 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

To be fair, you could have the best doctor in the world. The second they enter those dates into the database with the rest of your notes it is out of their hands. The IT department will be responsible for handing over the data.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 267 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Holy shit did Fox News just intimidate a juror in a high profile trial?

Edit - just got to this bit

Other outlets including NBC News, CNN, CBS News, and ABC News also publicized details about the juror, including additional identifying information.

What the fuck? How is this even in the public domain?

-3
submitted 2 years ago by Maggoty@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The Biden administration wants to set up a deconfliction line with China in much the same way they set one up with Russia during the Cold War. They're also signaling that future cooperation may come in the financial sector or by refining sanctions by tapping the Treasury Secretary as one of the next US officials to meet with Chinese leaders. The Commerce Secretary may also be about looking for a ways to offset the US bringing chip production home.

view more: next ›

Maggoty

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF