[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

I don't believe that. Not the same America that elected Obama. I think Trump's first term convinced people he wouldn't be that bad compared to a party that tried to do a "Weekend at Bernie's" with their candidate. This is a different Trump than we had last time. This one is willing to do every word of what he says. And that caught people by surprise.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

In this specific case? We've spent the last two decades watching overly broad anti terrorism laws get passed under the implicit agreement they wouldn't be abused. Then comes Trump. Americans have been asleep at the wheel since the 1970's. That's part of why right wing rhetoric keeps getting more extreme. They need to keep their voting base engaged. Most people don't want anything to do with politics. If that doesn't change then no amount of reform will prevent us from voting ourselves out of a democracy.

12
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The problem I'm struggling with is combat that's too easy. I usually have 6 or 7 players and battles are written for 4 or 5. At some point the sheer action economy means the fights are too easy. So I'm looking for a way to make fights more dangerous without straight up killing low level adventurers (going unconscious is fine, I just generally don't kill players until mid levels) and without making combat take a long time.

So far I've tried;

Extra HP, which turned into a slap fight. Players and baddies just rolling to hit over and over. It takes longer and is boring.

Adding Enemies, this can induce a feeling of danger but as with the extra HP it takes longer because the party still has to chew through the extra HP.

Extra Damage, the most promising so far but very hard to balance. It's easy to overtune it and make a fight impossible for a party. But it doesn't affect time as much and it's been the most popular so far.

Ideas I want to try include;

Replacing a baddie with a spellcaster or adding one. This would hopefully not drag the fight out, but would require dynamic thinking, especially if extra damage is in play for the martial enemies.

Wave fights, it's easier to control for time, and I could delay a wave to give them healing time. If things are going long the extra waves just don't appear.

Control as swarms, this could probably really cut time down but if one roll misses than all attacks from the grouping miss. Which might play into the action economy problem I'm already facing.

3 round anti heroes, choose one or several enemies to stay up for 3 rounds no matter what. Record their damage and kill them off as they get hit in the fourth round if they hit zero. But allow them to remain conscious for 3 rounds. But I wouldn't be able to give updates on their health to the players. Maybe I could communicate they special status instead, like glowing eyes, or an aura of zeal.

Any other ideas are welcome!

312
Void Kittens (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 136 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A reminder about your rights. If the government can declare you to have an attribute that negates your rights, then you have no rights.

In laymen's terms, if ICE arrests you and fast deports you, whose going to stop them? Okay but you get to a consulate in the foreign country and get back home. When you come out of your lawyer's office (because you're suing ICE), ICE arrests you again, this time as a criminal illegal alien because you came back in. They tell no one they have you, they tell no one where you are. You have no rights according to them. You are sent to an El Salvadoran prison in contravention of a court order not to deport you.

These are all things that have happened separately. We've accidently deported Americans. We've deported Americans on purpose. (Trump sent American kids away so he could deport their parents too) We've deported someone to an El Salvadoran prison in contravention of a court order.

If they don't have rights, then neither do you because the government can just declare you a member of that group and as long as the guys with guns maintain that fiction, nobody can stop them.

[-] [email protected] 170 points 6 months ago

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but didn't striking become less violent and destructive because we all agreed to gentleman's rules?

Rules the NYPD just broke?

They're forgetting the lessons we all learned in the gilded age.

1
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A CBS News investigation found dozens of law enforcement leaders — sheriffs, captains, lieutenants, chiefs of police — buying and illegally selling firearms, even weapons of war, across 23 U.S. states, Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., from the Deep South to the Midwest, Northeast and California coast. 

167
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A CBS News investigation found dozens of law enforcement leaders — sheriffs, captains, lieutenants, chiefs of police — buying and illegally selling firearms, even weapons of war, across 23 U.S. states, Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., from the Deep South to the Midwest, Northeast and California coast.

86
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

That's it, include a link of course but otherwise it's unchanged.

[-] [email protected] 152 points 7 months ago

Daily reminder that the US is a shit hole country.

31
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Several people pointed out that our rules for behavior weren't immediately apparent. While I would say this shouldn't be an issue in a community about posting new communities, I have been proven wrong on multiple occasions. So I have made the list in our sidebar. These are a paraphrasing of Mastodon.World's rules. So there is no functional change. We will continue to use their rules as a master list. But they boil down to being civil. If you don't like something or someone and have no constructive criticism, then you just move on.

I'm going to put changes here as well so people on apps can see them easier.

The rules for behavior are a straight carry over of Mastodon.World’s rules. You can click the link but we’ve reposted them here in brief, as a guideline. We will continue to use the Mastodon.World rules as the master list. Over all, be nice to each other and remember this isn’t a community built around debate. For the rules about formatting your posts, scroll down to number 2.

  1. Follow the rules of Mastodon.world, which can be found here.(link)

A. Provide an inclusive and supportive environment. This means if it isn’t rule breaking and we can’t be supportive to them then we probably shouldn’t engage.

B. No illegal content.

C. Use content warnings where appropriate. This means mark your submissions NSFW if need be.

D. No uncivil behavior. This includes, but is not limited to: Name Calling; Bullying; Trolling; Disruptive Commenting; or Personal Criticisms.

E. No Harrassment. As an example in relation to Transgender people this includes, deadnaming, misgendering, and promotion of conversion therapy. Similarly Misogyny, Misandry, and Racism are also banned here.

72
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Guys I understand there's big stuff going on in the world. This community though is really just about finding other communities. For now, on the theory that people kind of forgot where they were, some temp bans were handed out. I have no pretensions of this being c/news or something. But I also have no pretensions of this being c/news. It is absolutely beyond the pale to post your political broadsides here while people are trying to figure out the best place to have their community. The only way politics is acceptable here is if you're talking about opening or moving a community about politics or because of politics. And it should absolutely remain civil. A simple, "I don't like your ideology", is enough here.

[-] [email protected] 145 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The idiocy of naming your kid Khaleesi aside, the UK just decided that a corporation can own your name and prevent you from enjoying the rights of your citizenship.

That's pretty fucked.

Edit - Apparently they did backtrack. But it's still amazing that anyone even thought that was a thing.

50
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Here we go again.

[-] [email protected] 225 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be fair, you could have the best doctor in the world. The second they enter those dates into the database with the rest of your notes it is out of their hands. The IT department will be responsible for handing over the data.

[-] [email protected] 267 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Holy shit did Fox News just intimidate a juror in a high profile trial?

Edit - just got to this bit

Other outlets including NBC News, CNN, CBS News, and ABC News also publicized details about the juror, including additional identifying information.

What the fuck? How is this even in the public domain?

[-] [email protected] 172 points 1 year ago

Can we just acknowledge that this is unhinged? Biden has the strongest border policies ever implemented by a Democrat. This just shows that there is no compromise possible with these traitors. They will never admit you made a step in their direction, only demand more and more and more until you're just doing their bidding.

This is truly the way of extremists and terrorists, they demand the country be run to their preferences, democratic systems be damned.

[-] [email protected] 196 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Stop telling them this in advance! They can't get at your work material or deliberations. Just give them a general affirmative and go on to nullify that shit.

Also, at the point you can't seat a jury because they're telling you they won't convict there has to be some kind of slaughter rule. To stop wasting the court's time if nothing else. Because at some point you're just letting the prosecutor choose a verdict, not a jury.

[-] [email protected] 174 points 2 years ago

No, this was the point. He set mass transit back by at least a decade with his ridiculous projects.

[-] [email protected] 142 points 2 years ago

WSWS isn't a great source because it's based on a cause.

However, here's the report.

It's uh... Not good.

At what point does the Foreign Assistance Act's ban on sending aid to countries in violation of human rights standards come into play? It seems like we're getting a report on a new war crime every few days, which is a breathtaking rate for a professional Army.

-3
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The Biden administration wants to set up a deconfliction line with China in much the same way they set one up with Russia during the Cold War. They're also signaling that future cooperation may come in the financial sector or by refining sanctions by tapping the Treasury Secretary as one of the next US officials to meet with Chinese leaders. The Commerce Secretary may also be about looking for a ways to offset the US bringing chip production home.

view more: next ›

Maggoty

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF