this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
196 points (100.0% liked)

news

23640 readers
600 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
196
Bizarre reason why McDonald's worker might not receive $60,000 reward for identifying Luigi Mangione (www.unilad.com)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
104 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

i-cant

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The tip-off from the employee is apparently crucial in the case, but the question remains if the worker will be able to cash in on the $60k reward at all. The rules are complicated, as they stipulate tipsters in with a chance of the FBI portion of the reward cannot nominate themselves.

This means the McDonald's worker will have to be put forward by an investigating agency, such as the Department of Defense or the FBI, which is then reviewed by an interagency committee. If approved, the suggestion is passed on to the Secretary of State, who signs off on the final decision.

If that's not tough enough, the full reward amount could also be in dispute as payment amounts are based on factors from the value of the information provided, the level of threat, the severity of danger or injury to people or property, and the degree of the source's cooperation. As for the NYPD's $10k, the rewards program is granted through Crime Stoppers, where tipsters receive a unique reference number.

This number is crucial as the tipster has to use it call back or check the status of the investigation online before lodging a claim with the NYC Police Foundation and the Crime Stoppers Board of Directors, who ultimately decide whether to approve the tip and instruct the caller how to receive it. So, if the informant called 911 instead of Crime Stoppers, they might be unable to make the claim.

In both cases, the rewards will only be paid out if the arrest leads to indictment or conviction from the court - so the McDonald's employee could be waiting a while and even at the end of it all, might not even get a dime.

[–] [email protected] 104 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I remember when I found a bunch of stolen goods and handed it in to the cops after I'd find out as much as possible about the goods (it was jewellry thrown in a lake, my family thinks somebody hit it there after doing a break-in and would wait for the heat to die off). We'd cleaned up the silverware, found names, dates, all sorts of stuff that could help the cops find the owners. Lots of family heirlooms. I handed it in so my little sister could learn something about doing The Good Thing and Helping Others, plus we found some fun in talking about the finders' fee.
Three days later I come back and the cops say they didn't receive any goods that day, and I also spot two of them wearing watches that were among the goods handed in. one of them winked at me.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 week ago (2 children)

every single cop should be executed

Death to America

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This happened on christmas day too. Seemed like the opportunity to do a genuine christmas miracle for some family that probably missed their old heirlooms + an incredible PR opportunity for the cops. But nah.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They didn't even give you one of those "Porky's friends" cards to get out of tickets and shit?

Hogs gonna hog.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

:this:

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope you were not much older than your sister.
Getting cops envolved is never a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago

I was still a teen, but it's not like we got cops involved really. We went to the local station and delivered a bunch of stolen goods we'd found in a lake. If anything the cops stayed out of it, considering the fact that they didn't do anything

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reads like the fine print on an insurance contract

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago

FBI and NYPD can have a little deny depose defend aa a treat

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This ain't a reward, it's a sweepstakes for a chance to win!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

But wait, you can avoid income tax because it's a raffle!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The rules are complicated, as they stipulate tipsters in with a chance of the FBI portion of the reward cannot nominate themselves.

Idk what that means. in particular

tipsters in with a chance

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

It's awkwardly written definitely, and I'm not sure I've parsed it correctly either but:

tipsters in with a chance

I read as 'tipsters who have a chance'. 'in with a chance' is the phrase here that sits awkwardly. It appears another verb has been elided and adding one back in e.g. "Tipsters who have a chance of receiving the FBI portion..." would be more complete and easier to read imo but it's still a mess of a sentence.

As for the self-nomination, it's addressed in the next paragraph

This means the McDonald's worker will have to be put forward by an investigating agency, such as the Department of Defense or the FBI, which is then reviewed by an interagency committee

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

so the McDonald's employee could be waiting a while and even at the end of it all, might not even get a dime.