177
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 47 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

its the california party they are running with

[-] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

They're running under multiple parties?

[-] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago

only in california, since there is already an established socialist anti-war party there (PFP)

[-] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Also in South Carolina, they're endorsed and running under the South Carolina Worker's Party cause it saved some work to get on the ballot as well.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

Huh. That's weird, why would they choose to hide the "socialism" part. Scared of scaring "swing voters"? To me it seems very spineless, if that was their choice.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 7 months ago

PFP and PSL have been working together in california for like a decade now. And its not like california is a swing state to scare off any swing voters.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

Ahhh, didn't even know PFP was a thing of it's own. First time in hearing of it lol

[-] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago

it was formed out of anti vietnam war protests. PSL are just using PFP's resources in california for ballot access, and to not waste energy running against them

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

this is good and there should be more of it

[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Shes listed as independent in a lot of states

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
177 points (96.8% liked)

chapotraphouse

13854 readers
829 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS