this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
153 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13480 readers
944 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I shouldn't have to say this on a """communist""" forum, but here we are. Calling for unlimited genocide on the first world (lmao point out the "first world" on a map, I'll wait) is obviously reactionary on top of being idealist.

The idea that anything can be "unlimited" is pure capitalist decadence based on its foundational need for unlimited growth.

Any real socialist should be calling for a genocide that has its resources planned and allocated by a People's Genocide Committee and is then executed over five years. The genocide would be limited in both resource and geography, and thus, be a materialist genocide.

Or, even better, they might consider a means-tested genocide.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

i definitely do not, the trans struggle sessions caused lots of damage

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

IIRC the worst trans struggle sessions were in the real early days long before federation, like the ones that ended with people being banned for having a noticeable pattern of downvoting trans users exclusively, or on whether pronoun tags should be mandatory, or on neo-pronouns being an option.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

nah there were terrible ones on federation

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't remember any trans struggle sessions?

We're right about everything, so there's nothing to struggle over?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

there were lots of people coming in to argue about trans rights