chapotraphouse

13646 readers
934 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
2301
 
 
2302
 
 

"Bro! I gotta hit up this local beer hall to get some authentic Germany brews!"

Lenin revealed to be a total douche! no-choice

Link

2303
 
 

I simply vote for one fewer candidate than you do. When you understand why you refuse to vote Republican or for third party, you will understand why I refuse to vote for yours.

2304
 
 

He got me to read the Manifesto and would have hours' long debates with our social-democratic roommate and now this. It's really shaking me up a bit.

He is on the whole defeatist 'nothing will fundamentally shake the imperial machine so might as well pick the wardog with better domestic policies' tip. I want to get through to him but I am getting stuck.

For example:

i also refuse to not vote my conscience but i figured this time its not like doing this abstract process to pick if id prefer -100 points vs -200 points is gonna matter that much if i genuinely believe itll even be slightly better under kamala i might as well

kitty-birthday-sad

2305
 
 

Yeah I know dating apps bad etc

I paid 17 dollars for the week pass allowing me unlimited likes 💀 of course because I’m desperate and they force you into that choice because using it for free you only get 5 free likes a day lmao. The problem is NOBODY fucking responds back to my messages, I’ve had 2 conversations out of 20 matches, one of the convos died after I asked them out, the other convo just ended abruptly for no apparent reason. It’s really demoralizing to say the least but I just don’t understand, if they don’t like me and accidentally sent a like they should just unmatch right away but they don’t.

The future is grim. How does anyone meet anyone anymore?

2306
 
 

This is the most important election of our lives. Not important enough to hire, like, one person to watch the boxes to make sure they aren't set on fire though.

Text description of Image: Twitter post by Katu News: Watch: The moment responders remove HUNDREDS of burning ballots from a Vancouver ballot box this morning. Full story... (URL I can't read). Below that, subtweeted, by Evan Bell (@evanbellKATU) The clark county elections ballot drop box at the fisher's landing transit center was lit on fire this morning. Clark Co. Augitor Greg Kimsey says hundreds of ballots were insde at the time. The last pickiup being 11am Saturday. Full story here (incomplete URL) @katunews

Below that is an image. It is a rainy evening. In the back ground police emergency tape sections off the area. In the foreground a person is wreathed in smoke as they reach for a pile of burning material that has been pulled from an open ballot drop box. The drop box has "Official Ballot Drop Box" written on that and below that a large "VOTE" decal next to an american flag. Standing behind the smoke clouded person are two first responders. One holds a camera.

2307
 
 

Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline. Or maybe it's an EF5

2308
 
 

But seriously, this is a well known phenomenon. The people native to the mountain regions of the world are well-known for their joyous homosexuality while the despicable people of the flatlands' heterosexuality is as boring and monotonous as their physical landscape

2309
 
 
2310
 
 
2311
 
 

Watch what the Israeli army did to my home in northern Gaza. It destroyed my life and my family's. 😞💔

2312
 
 

Sometimes I have like manic episodes, for lack of a better term, in which I fixate intensely on a topic and I'm suddenly extremely motivated to learn as much as possible (i don't think they're real manic episodes and I'm mentally fine so dw), but for the first time I want to actually follow up on this momentum and learn about the topic I'm fixating on. Behold my ramblings:

What books should I read to learn about the stuff below? If no such books exist, I'll write one.

Overall question: what are the mechanisms by which capitalists extract surplus value from labor? And how can the working people of the world dismantle these mechanisms?

  • I use the phrase “what are the mechanisms by which” and not the word “how” intentionally, because I know that the answer to “how” is “by violence or the threat thereof.”

  • The question I want to answer is more in the financial “nitty-gritty” of the process. It is obvious that, for example, a coffee farmer in Ethiopia, stevedores in various ports all over the world, and a barista at the Starbucks in my neighborhood all produce value which is extracted by the Starbucks corporation as well as other companies involved in the production process of a cup of coffee (international shipping companies, the companies that make the plastic cups used at Starbucks, etc.). But how, precisely, does that extracted surplus value turn into wealth (not just money in a bank account but wealth in the broadest sense of the term) for the people who own those corporations?

  • The most obvious answer is in the dividends paid to shareholders and the increase in the stock price of the various companies involved. But what else? Surely there is a huge obfuscatory architecture of financial tools that hides the true extent of the wealth of the haute bourgeoisie.

    • Examples that jump to mind include: money laundering via fine art (e.g., Salvator Mundi), off-shore bank accounts, and shell and holding companies

    • What do the “bank countries” (Singapore, the Cayman Islands, the City of London, etc.) have to do with this?

  • Of course, the final question to ask is: how can we destroy these mechanisms? What are their greatest vulnerabilities? Taking control over any given state seems like an insufficient response, since international capital has numerous bases from which it can operate to hide the extent to which the haute bourgeoisie are hoarding wealth and there’s no indication they can’t create more if we did manage to destroy one. How can the proletariat take control of international finance?

Background reading

  • What do the Panama Papers tell us about this question? What other work has been done so far to unravel the obfuscatory architecture mentioned above?

  • To what extent would Marx’ Capital provide a framework in which to answer this question? What about writings by later Marxists?

I apologize if this makes no sense at all

Death to America

2313
 
 

Aya Mohammed is her name

She’s a Palestinian from Gaza who Is still there and reached out to me to post her go fund me

She decided to make an account here purely based on curiosity

Here’s her account

I think it’s still waiting approval

Crazy that we might have 3 Palestinians here

She says she forgot the password

If any of the mods see this ,please tell us so that she can activate it and we will change it later

EDIT: She actually had a screen shot lol

2314
 
 
2315
54
title (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
2316
 
 

Mr. Bloomberg, who is 82 years old and has an estimated net worth of $105 billion, is the second largest disclosed individual donor to Democrats in this election cycle, after the investor and philanthropist George Soros. But publicly, Democrats observed that Mr. Bloomberg was donating nowhere close to what he had spent during the presidency of Donald J. Trump.

The $47 million he had given in federally disclosed political contributions during this election cycle, before his new nonprofit donation, was less than half of the $95 million he disclosed to help Democrats retake Congress in the 2018 midterms.

Look at this "journalism"...

When Mr. Bloomberg ran for president in 2020, he spent $1.1 billion in a real-world experiment on whether enormous money could buy votes. It couldn’t. He got creamed in the Democratic primaries.

A creepy, unelectable billionaire spent a zillion dollars and lost is proof of nothing. And to say in general that money doesn't influence elections is insane.

2317
 
 

Report Finds You Should Get To Retire After, Like, 6 Years Working Full-Time Job

LOS ANGELES—Calling the findings of its comprehensive survey of American workplace practices “total bullshit,” the Institute for Research on Labor and Employment issued a report Monday concluding that you should be able to retire after, like, six years of working full time. “We evaluated the data around current U.S. employment rates, and our research shows that it’s basically crazy that we have to waste our whole damn lives working before we can retire,” said report co-author Sarah Middleton, who explained that six years is actually a really long time and that it sounds like more than enough labor for one person. “Our research found that people have to work and stuff or else nothing would get done, but anything more than half a decade or so seems cruel and excessive. That has to be hundreds of hours of work, right? And after consulting with experts across the field, we determined that six years was a totally reasonable amount of time to pay your dues before you get to kick back and chill. After that long, people are so broken down they barely contribute much anyway, so this seems like a good compromise. Maybe if you’re part-time you work 10 years or something. I mean, when are people supposed to do things that they like? We heard that’s how they do it in Europe already anyway.” Middleton confirmed that the findings were based on a full-time workweek of five-hour days, four days per week.

2318
 
 

This will be the Democrats' strategy to avoid another Bernie being in the primaries.

2319
 
 

I think it's called New York City?

2320
 
 

bear-despair FFS

2321
 
 

But have you considered that the economy is doing great? very-intelligent

Surely the incumbent party won't get bit by this at the polls clueless

Anecdotally my org is set to give nearly 30% more food in 2024 than last year

2322
 
 

"How JD Vance's favourite magic the gathering card could reveal his dark political ambitions"

2323
 
 
2324
 
 

Critical support to comrade Trump in his fight against KKKeir SStürmer

2325
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›