I'm working on a bootleg remix (i.e. a remix without permission from the rights holder) right now, which is something that I haven't really done before. Not trying to monetize it, I don't have a large following anyway and I haven't even come up with an artist name I actually like using (I'm not going to call myself DJ Rumschlumpel, but TBH that one would actually be better than the ones I've used before).

Anyone knowledgable about where to post it without getting in trouble? Obviously a bootleg remix is by definition illegal, but lots of producers are posting them anyway on various sites like Soundcloud. How do I minimize the risk of getting into trouble? Also I kinda don't want to post to Soundcloud, it's enshittyfying.

TBH my best experience with posting my tracks in general was on the Ardour forum, but I currently use Bitwig and AFAIK they don't really have a standard forum.

For what it's worth, I live in Germany.

geteilt von: https://lemmy.world/post/41163572

Both mods are also moderators of announcements@discuss.online; they are admins, this is their instance, and they are engaging in vote tampering to boost their instance and its communities over the rest of the fediverse.

jgrim@discuss.online m_f@discuss.online

Es geht um Anna Liedtke, die im Oktober an der "Freedom Flotilla Coalition" teilgenommen hat. Hier noch ein Nachrichtenartikel zum Thema von vor ein paar Wochen: https://perspektive-online.net/2025/12/vergewaltigung-in-israelischer-gefangenschaft-es-hat-meinen-willen-nicht-gebrochen/

Das ist tatsächlich komplett an mir vorbeigegangen. Wurde in deutschsprachigen Medien wohl nicht viel drüber berichtet.

geteilt von: https://ibbit.at/post/113710

Since April 2024, Germany has been on trial before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague. Nicaragua had filed a case against the Federal Republic, accusing it of complicity in the genocide in Gaza. As has now become known, German representatives may have made false statements in their very first testimony before the ICJ in April 2024, concerning the arms exports delivered to Israel.

“Not disclosed”

As Drop Site News (DSN) and the liberal German magazine Stern reported in a joint article, there are now serious doubts about Germany’s statements. They cite comments from the German Defense Ministry, obtained through a press law procedure before a German administrative court. According to these documents, the ministry stated that its testimony before the ICJ in April 2024 had been made “in agreement with the affected state,” meaning Israel. The ministry also admitted that “the differentiated information on Bundeswehr exports,” was “not disclosed in the proceedings before the ICJ.” The Defense Ministry argued before the court that it could not release information about transfers to specific countries “for reasons of contractually agreed confidentiality”, since doing so could seriously damage the trust between Germany and Israel.

Following the “Al-Aqsa Flood” operation and the beginning of the Gaza genocide in October 2023, the value of German military exports to Israel increased tenfold overnight. The Federal Republic thus became, after the United States, the second most important supplier of weapons to the Zionist regime; at one point, a third of Israel’s weapons were said to have come from Germany. By mid-May 2025, successive German governments had approved arms deliveries worth 485 million euros. Added to this were donations from the Bundeswehr’s own stocks to the IDF.

It is these donations that DSN and Stern have raised doubts about. German representatives had claimed before the ICJ that in 2023 no weapons of war but only “medical supplies and helmets” had been delivered to Israel from Bundeswehr inventories. Lea Reisner, spokeswoman for the Left Party in the German parliament, commented to the German left-wing daily junge Welt: “For many months, the federal government has been deceiving the public about the extent of German arms deliveries to Israel – and now, apparently, also the International Court of Justice.”

Growing pressure

While the fact that Germany is standing trial in The Hague on charges of complicity in a new genocide has been largely ignored within the dominant discourse in Germany, Nicaragua’s case nonetheless appears to have exerted considerable pressure on the German government. Over the course of 2024, the number of weapons delivered by Germany to Israel fell sharply, without any official explanation. Even the state broadcaster Deutsche Welle (which reports far more critically in English than in German in order to project an image of Germany as a country with a critical media landscape, which is just not true) suggested that the decline may be linked to the ICJ case.

In August 2025, the current chancellor, Friedrich Merz, announced that Germany would no longer supply weapons to Israel “that can be used in Gaza”. It quickly became clear, however, that this referred only to new export licenses, while previously approved arms shipments were unaffected. Moreover, Israel’s navy received new warships and submarines from Germany immediately after Merz’s announcement, even though it plays a central role in the illegal blockade of the Gaza Strip.

Nevertheless, this surprising step by the German government shows that even in Berlin there was a perceived need to take measures that at least appear to resemble sanctions.

And the possible fact that the Federal Republic may have made false statements at the very beginning of the trial before the UN’s highest court can also be seen as an indication that those in power in Berlin are fully aware that their policy of so-called “German Staatsräson” violates international law. This affair, however, is unlikely to do much for Germany’s credibility before the ICJ.

Leon Wystrychowski is a former member of the Palästina Solidarität Duisburg (Palestine Solidarity Duisburg, PSDU). The Organization was banned by the German state in 2024.

The post Did Germany mislead the World Court? appeared first on Peoples Dispatch.

From Peoples Dispatch via this RSS feed

Yesterday, there was a bot that made a ton of posts in different communities. The mods of ttrrpg.network banned that user, and about 20 other people were also banned from several communities each on ttrpg.network (including me) with the reason given "Account used to boost spambot account" (for me it was all the communities on that server that I was subscribed to, but I wasn't actually banned from the instance):

The mods also made a pinned post in that sub (it's unpinned now) where they explain their reasoning some more:

Just got done investigating a spambot we had earlier, and it looks like they used a lot of compromised accounts on other instances to give their post an initial upvote boost. If you don’t already, please remember to use a good strong password.

I do remember interacting with at least one post from that bot, to me it looked fairly innocuous until I looked at the sheer volume of posts they made since the account was created. I assume that I'd notice if my account was hijacked, especially while I was still actively browsing lemmy, and my password is certainly not easily to bruteforce or guess. I also took a look at the profiles of the other users who were banned, there were quite a few who were still posting or commenting after they were banned from rpgmemes - none of those profiles looked suspicious to me, and many of the ones who didn't post or comment anything since then just weren't that active in the first place.

Frankly, I don't believe that any of those banned accounts were actually hacked. It looks to me like the mods just banned everyone who interacted with that bot. I understand that spambots are a big issue that is difficult to solve, but fediverse mods and admins need to be a lot more precise with dealing with that than this - the cure can't be worse than the poison.

I did message one community mod of rpgmemes and one of the server admins about this, but neither got back to me.

I was out of tequila, so I made a Ti'Punch and sweetened it with triple sec. Tried a proper-ish margarita recipe after. Then I tried a bunch of different rums and settled on Isautier rhum blanc traditionnel (see pic), which tastes about halfway between unaged Jamaican rum and agricole blanc, though agricole works great, too. Both rhum traditionnel and rhum agricole match the mineralic, vegetal notes of tequila and the traditionnel I have is not quite as fruity as the agricoles I have.

my recipe (adjust according to how you like your margaritas/daisies/daiquiris/ti'punches):

• 26ml rum (rhum traditionnel blanc or rhum agricole blanc with ~50% ABV)

• 18ml triple sec (I used 40% de Kuyper)

• 6ml lime juice

• serve on ice and stir

Arguably this is more of a Ti'Punch with triple sec than a rum margarita. This style of rum really wants to be drunken without too much dilution IMO, but feel free to make it more similar to a margarita. For what it's worth, I often drink tequila as a Ti'Punch with tequila instead of rum - I just really like Ti'Punch as a template.

I'm surprised that there isn't an established cocktail for this "margarita with the spirit swapped for agricole" thing, it seems like a very natural substitution to me. It's probably due to limited availability of French rum in latin american and anglophone countries.