RowRowRowYourBot

Legit saw a comment that was removed from memes.ml for incivility that questioned the accuracy of a meme suggesting suicides were lower in China and North Korea compared to Taiwan and South Korea because they’re “communist”. It was very civil. The mods just didnt like being questioned I guess.

Removing him without the opportunity to defend himself is NOT the rule of law.

Do you not get that what Jesus said in regards to naked, hungry, and sick people is in no way undone by what you claim (regardless of the degree of accuracy or lack thereof)?

They go criminal we also act criminally isn't a good path to go down.

Why are so many people in this thread advocating extra judicial action when many/most of us are complaining about the GOP doing the same?

As I have told you he has to have the right to defend himself against the charges. He never faced a trial so he never has had an opportunity to defend himself.

I hate Mayor Adams. I wanted him sacked when he hired his brother to a job said brother was unqualified for in his first few days but there is a process to remove him and none of those steps have been met other than presenting the charge.

The thing is if you want to maintain rule of law then you need to follow those rules. You can’t just decide to ignore it when you want to but then pretend you have any legitimacy. That would make you no different than any other dictator.

and that process requires the mayor to be presented charges that he gets to defend himself against. That’s a trial

You could kill almost anyone in NV as you cannot kill children in any game nor can you kill major quest givers.

Perhaps they have reasons to not want to encourage senseless violence to NPC’s at a time when a chunk of the population clearly views others as IRL NPC’s?

“to be heard in his defense” that’s from the actual law. Im using defense because that was the verb used, whereas you are using respond which means the same thing in this context.

Im not sure what the goal was here. It seems the complaint is that you cannot shoot NPCs in non-combat situations. That while one game considers taking items to be stealing whereas the other does not which the content creator seems to miss.

Is this really about attention to detail or do they just prefer one game to the other due to directorial choices?

They will be able to cite the extrajudicial removal of Adams as precedent for why they can do it.

Do you think rule of law should only be maintained when both of the two major parties supports it?

Do you think Hochul is going to win reelection? Do you think she will never be replaced? The precedent is for the NY governors that follow her. Wasn't that obvious?