209
I once saw a comment that said, "If libraries didn't already exist, there's no way you'd get Republicans to agree to the concept of paying taxes to fund them."
I think about that a lot. Guess he was more right than he knew.
Oh, I've said that! But I'm sure I'm not the only person to have come up with it.
They would also fight like hell against a "no shirt, no shoes, no service" bill if it was proposed today.
[...] the group’s agenda and politics were inconsistent with Georgia’s conservative values.
In other words, supporting open access to a broad range of varied information is against their conservative values. Not that that's news to anyone following conservative behaviors, but it must be emphasized for those that don't.
Alongside that, undercutting a source of funds may not be banning books, but it absolutely reduces the operational capacities of libraries that were benefiting from them, in effect removing a range of books the libraries might otherwise provide.
Which is why their trying to knee-cap the internet.
Experience guides my way; anything a politician says before or after "think of the children" has nothing to do with actual childrens safety and everything to do with undermining your constitutional rights
Every single time. Without fail.
Grew up in Oklahoma, way back when. Fucking with library funding was unthinkable. Banning books was unthinkable. That was Nazi shit, unthinkable. What's next? State sponsored book burnings?!
That must’ve been a long time ago. Oklahoma and East Texas have been on this path since at least the Regan era.
https://youtu.be/YHdLjvpXjZU?feature=shared
Yes. We are fucked.
Just when I thought Georgia was on the upswing
Progress is rarely a flat line
Progress is never a flat line. Incrementalism only exist to erode our rights, not gain them. Rights are cemented hard and fast with a pen stroke. Incrementalism is the 10000 lawsuits chipping away at it one nib le at a time. 50 years of that and look, Roe gets overturned.
Did the DMV happen to lose your license plates recently?
Does he know what Marxism is?
Is anyone keeping a history of everything they’re trying to do? A record should be available to pass the same laws against churches
Bans private funds for it? Two new again how Republicans are the party of free market and small government.
Gotta save that money for the book burnings.
The right is going for a Gilead speedrun
this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
209 points (98.2% liked)
News
35749 readers
2356 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS