I kept burning my food or wait forever for the pan to heat up and I finally understand why. Each knob has a different direction for the Hi and Lo (also why isn’t it Low).

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 147 points 3 years ago (7 children)

You'll love it more when the numbers get washed off. Here's mine.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    How in the hell did this make it to market?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Mass consumerism and companies not caring.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Their target audiences are home flippers who just need the cheapest stainless steel appliances that look fine at a glance, and cheap landlords that don't understand that they're choosing themselves more money in the long run.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    I don't get how this would be cheaper to manufacture. They'd need to make five different switches.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago

    By knobs, you mean rotary switches, I assume. I think the thing is they cheaped out by not designing the switches they needed. Instead they just sourced whatever rotary switches they could find that had the number of outputs they needed for these weird, segmented burners, regardless of their potentiometer directions.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 115 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    My dryer has a "less dry" setting.

    Who likes their laundry done rare?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 97 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    That actually makes sense for things you want to finish drying on a line so they don’t heat up too much and shrink.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 61 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Also for if you enjoy the feeling of cold damp underwear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Cold damp underwear sucks.

    Cold damp socks on the other foot...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 67 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    At least “Off” is consistent. That could have been a total train wreck.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    I bought a portable electric space heater a few years ago that had an alarming tendency to rewire itself - like, "Off" would become "Low", "High" would become "Fan" etc. Finally took it apart and realized that the dial was just a contact that rolled across a bit of printed solder and occasionally the solder would melt (no way they could have expected that to happen in a fucking heater) and flow into a new pattern. I have absolutely no idea why thousands of people haven't burned themselves to death with these things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 59 points 3 years ago

    mildly?

    This is fucking pitchfork worthy

  • source
  • [–] 52 points 3 years ago

    It's like your stove top was the experimental test one where you could see how all the knob styles worked, like it wasn't supposed to be released to the public.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    You have double burners. Some of your knobs have two HI and two LO positions, one for one burner and one for both burners.

    On top of the stove this looks like two concentric heating elements. You can turn on one or both. Turning on both is sometimes called a “fast boil” burner.

    The best solution the industry has come up with is to put two control surfaces into one knob, so instead of the control surface being a full circle it’s a half circle.

    There’s no way to make all the knobs match in appearance unless all the burners have optional double burner operation.

    source: am appliance salesman.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 3 years ago* (5 children)

    I'm really trying to understand what's going on here in a way that makes sense, even if it's a twisted kind of sense.

    My best guess is that each of these burners are a different size and some have multiple rings and that by turning the knob left (Anti-clockwise), you're going from smaller number of rings to larger number of rings - however, the rings start at their highest heat level. So looking at the bottom right dial as an example, the first "Notch" on the left is the smallest burner on the highest setting, then as you turn left more, it'll dial down that burner until you get to the second ring on the burner - starting at full power for that second burner and continuing to lower power until you get to the 3rd ring, then it's same again for the 4th ring.

    Is that right? am I even close? I don't understand why you'd go from smallest burner to highest burner anti-clockwise, but go from lowest burner-power to highest clockwise. That still doesn't make sense to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago* (7 children)

    That's pretty much exactly how it is.

    OP's stove is GCRE3060AF, or similar. The rightmost knob is inconsistent for reasons I cannot fathom, unless there is some obscure electrical reason. It is an electric stove, and the knobs with multiple ranges do indeed control burners that have multiple potential sizes. One of them has two selectable sizes, and other has three. On these I believe the rationale is that the high setting is the closest and most easily accessible because radiant electric ranges suck [citation not needed] and since they take forever and a day to heat up most users will just leap right to the full blast output setting immediately. I have no idea why the direction on the last knob is backwards from the others, clockwise versus counterclockwise, but it is.

    If you're morbidly curious, you can view the entire control panel from OP's stove (or one similar) here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 3 years ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 30 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    This looks like an AI-generated fever dream nightmare.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 3 years ago

    The longer I stare at it, the worse it gets ...

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 3 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    I can explain this one! When the knob only has one set of hi/lo, it controls the burner's heat as you'd expect, and it all works in the same direction. Those with multiple hi/lo sets control the heat and the size of the burner, since there are 2 (and on one, maybe 3?) concentric heating elements available for that knob.

    I've had something similar for years, and have never had an issue. I'm even less likely to accidentally choose the wrong knob since the single-size one tends to have a looser feel to it.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 22 points 3 years ago

    WTF, they're all different?

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 3 years ago

    This is maybe the worst thing I have seen in my life.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Lo for the same reason it's hi and not high.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 3 years ago

    That should be illegal, throw it out

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Ohhh, that’s just a left-handed stove.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    My brain is on fire seeing this

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    "Which one should we put on the stove?"

    "Yes."

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    Please stop, he’s already dead….

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Using "Low" would be more infuriating than "Lo".

    The full words are "High" (not "Hi") and "Low", so to save space they use the first two letters "Hi" and "Lo". If they use "Hi" and "Low" it would be inconsistent, e.g. more infuriating.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Last one is the only one that's out of place to me. They all have counter clockwise when solo mode, when 2 modes available, low is at the bottom and high is at the top, makes sense, but the last one is different.

    Also, why would it be Low? They're using 2 letters, Hi and Lo are different enough to identify. I'd have to check mine, but using Hi/Lo seems normal.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›