this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
144 points (80.8% liked)

Political Memes

5428 readers
2039 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I have a hard time respecting Chomsky because of his comments regarding post-modern philosophy. You'd think he would have a cogent criticism where he defends structuralism and Marxism. But no, it's just a bunch of conspiracy minded "they just say that because they're getting paid" nonsense you would expect from Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson.

He actually had the nerve to criticize Foucault for using unnecessarily esoteric language to explain simple things. Chomsky said that....ABOUT SOMEBODY ELSE!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

That was actually one of my earliest exposures to Chomsky. On one hand, I feel like "Postmodernism is fake because I can understand complex things but I can't understand this" may have prematurely soured me on him. On the other hand, considering his horrific takes on imperialism and atrocities that are committed by non-Western powers, perhaps being soured on him from the start isn't such a bad thing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

It's a completely valid criticism of Foucault. There's nothing I hate more than obscurantist Parisian bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

If I remember correctly, Chomsky is neither a structuralist nor a Marxist, and has said that he has not studied Marxism in much detail. Foucault was (sort of) a structuralist, and I think Zizek is a Marxist.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Chomsky’s response to the Epstein files release indicates 100% he knew and participated.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

https://www.insider.com/noam-chomsky-mit-wsj-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-2023-4

Renowned academic Noam Chomsky told The Wall Street Journal that his meetings with Jeffrey Epstein are "none of your business"

Oh, yikes. Even if that's meant simply as standing on principles of personal privacy, that's... tone deaf and not good optics, at the very least.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

its okay he is synthetic left this is to be expected

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago

Chomsky like Greenwald really licking the tit of Kremlin propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (5 children)

White hot take: All the "leftists" talking about how NATO shouldn't exist and is evil are the same morons who think Americans shouldn't vote for Biden on the grounds of him "not being left enough."

Like, yeah, NATO shouldn't have to exist, but we see what happens when smaller countries don't work together when near a larger/hostile neighbor. Same deal with voting for the (shitty) Democrats over Republicans: we know what happens when shitty people get into power, and it is painfully obvious they will do ANYTHING to keep power once in.

Sometimes, the best we can do is "stop things from getting shittier" instead of "making things less shitty."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

"smaller countries don’t work together when near a larger/hostile neighbor" Classic propaganda, you are aware that US is alone much wealthier and has bigger population than Russia?

NATO existing had an excuse when there was a Warsaw Pact, which was created to balance the powers of eastern and western block. After the fall of soviet union, it is just Russia (and Belarus in this war) and NATO should have been disbanded because clearly Russia is no threat to Europe and certainly not US, it can't even win it's idiot war against Ukraine.

Classic propaganda on each side is just pointing out other sides flaws, not accepting that all of us live in countries run by imperialistic governments. NATO is involved in far many wars in fighting for their own interests around the World then Russia and are funding Israel and Saudi Arabia, two most horrific countries in the World. There is no excuse for NATO as there is no excuse for Russia.

It amazes me that after two World wars started by the west, people still believe in this idiotic propaganda like they are the victims. Both are horrible, one is far bigger then the other, but both are horrible.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (37 children)

Anarchism doesn't really have an option aside from siding with NATO, as politically expensive that is. Imperialism was bad in the 16th century, in the 18th century, in the 20th century and is bad in the 21st century.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

As an anarchist I'm on the side of the Ukrainian people defending their homes and resisting imperialism. The fact that NATO is on the same side is just a coincidence.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Based Zizek

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

We can support Ukraine and even NATO without using the Bandera colours. He was a fascist.

Edit: I can't tell diagonal from horizontal.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Red and black with diagonal division is usually regarded as anarcho-communist. 'Anarcho-NATOism' is a common joke in some circles.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Oooh, right. Diagonal vs horizontal also.

Carry on.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

No worries! I understand the trepidation. No fascist-sympathies here, though, I promise you.

load more comments
view more: next ›