Mandatory? Nah, that won't work. Just do what my parents did: "you can stay up as late as you want if you are reading."

I still love a good book over 20 years later

I still use Joey for Reddit somehow, though I only use it for local stuff since there's no equivalent on Lemmy

Jormungandr has a section at Guantanamo as well!

Did the comment that sparked this specify that "they should have all their rights taken away?"

All that was said is "maybe we shouldn't let them have massive influence on how society functions." I fail to see how that means anything but "dont give them power" (which frankly, should probably apply to a lot of people...humans kinda suck)

If Australia's leaders try to scrap deals with the US, the CIA will just remove said leaders like they did last time

"Influence on the structure of society" is a pretty nebulous concept, albeit one that very few people have any capacity to actually change - Im not really sure it would qualify as "Having basic rights taken away." Unless "basic rights" includes the ability to create a massive company that exploit human beings for profit.

Ursula K. LeGuin!

From my experience with a Logitech G435 wireless headset (though no Steam Machine), you will be just fine plugging the dongle into a USB port and using it, even 30 feet away (so long as there is no interference).

I'm also aware that Steam has a built-in audio service, ao presumably you will be able to use it on SteamOS, though I imagine discord is still going to be the main way for people to communicate through VOIP (considering SteamOS is judt that: an OS, I imagine you can install discord without issue).

Oh? Does it? Can you point to where it says "we, the Ukrainian government are proclaiming to the world that we are targeting civilians?"

I don't see any evidence to back up the claim, so I'm afraid I can't agree to your assertion. A single image that can be interpreted in a multitude of ways (as I describe elsewhere in fact), is not any sort of proof I consider valid.

I'm greatly interested if you have other evidence to suggest the claim is true, as that would constitute a significant crime.

Edit (as it appears you have included further context in an edit): What I am wanting to see is a documented pattern of Ukrainian military personnel attacking civilians. I'm not talking about buildings - I want to see the UAF doing the same shit the IDF does to innocent Palestinians (that the world chooses to ignore).

Modern mechanized warfare by definition effectively forces civilian and military targets together because they rely on the same infrastructure to function (power plants, railroads, bridges, etc.) Does that make striking those things right? Well, no, but war itself isn't exactly "right," but striking those targets for their military value with civilian impact being collateral damage is a far cry from the IDF's double-tapping of aid workers.

Does that say "we consider civilians military targets?"

How dare you post the original context of the post - that goes against the narrative!