China's gonna be a phenomenal world leader.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 127 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I mean it's a better plan than invading the country, killing a million people and putting a bunch of pedophiles in charge, that's for certain.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Are you sure? Just because it didnt work the last 20 times doesnt mean we couldnt try again to see if it works

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 80 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (14 children)

    I get the point. Now, all my aprons come from Pakistan, how are women's rights doing there? Or India? Or Bangladesh?

    "Better than before women were employed in factories", OK fine. But this comment should be indistinguishable from r/neoliberal if that place weren't nazis in denial

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 73 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    women were involved in the industrial workforce in the west from the beginning, and three waves of feminism were still needed - the work not even over after that. So I don't really know if i agree with this take.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] [S] 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

    Did a single women's liberatory movement succeed before development of the industrial capacity and the incentive capital provides to the national bourgeoisie to see things change?

    We must prioritise the prerequisites. Certain material conditions are a necessity to meet before those movements can see success.

    EDIT: The phrasing is a bit racist in this part of the manifesto but still relevant:

    The rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian, nations into civilisation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Did a single women's liberatory movement succeed before development of the industrial capacity and the incentive capital provides to the national bourgeoisie to see things change?

    I finished Graeber's "History of Everything" not too long ago, and want to say this gets touched on, and the answer is 'yes.'

    That said, I gave my copy to my dad and would need to go page through it to cite that, so I very well may be wrong. Plus, it would have been centuries ago anyways, so not sure it's really relevant to your initial question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 68 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I much prefer the western strategy where we bomb the shit out of them until they realize how superior our western values^tm^ are.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago

    MY favorite western strategy to instill Western Values™ is to intentionally seek out the most right-wing weirdos in the country, go out of our way to convince them that women's rights is a Communist plot to lead them to Satan, and supply them with stinger missiles

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 54 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    I don't consider it a coincidence in the slightest that women's liberation kicked into high gear with women's employment and education opportunities. Anything else strikes me as cart before the horse.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    "Cart before the horse", Christ English is so stupidly polite. I need more vulgarity in phrases, how about "od dupy strony"? "From the ass' side". There you go! Seriously Polish needs to spread it's flexible vulgarity all over the world for a better change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    when youre turnt up on dialectical materialism

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

    I don’t know about that. The short-lived communist government of Afghanistan already gave women the rights to enroll in formal education and hold professional jobs, until it was couped by US-backed conservative forces in the name of anti-Soviet communism.

    This kind of argument actually sounds more like what a capitalist would say lol. See we are letting women into the workforce to double the labor force and double our profit! That’s progress!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    I don’t know about that. The short-lived communist government of Afghanistan already gave women the rights to enroll in formal education and hold professional jobs, until it was couped by US-backed conservative forces in the name of anti-Soviet communism.

    Yeah but... That failed.

    Not entirely because of women's liberation obviously.. But what do you think will happen if China goes and militarily props up some communists to run Afghanistan? Exactly the same thing that happened with the USSR. Afghanistan doesn't exist in a vacuum and exterior forces will use all of these things as weapons to overthrow the communists. They would absolutely prop up right wing extremists to kick out communists if that is what China installed. It's how we got to where we are today in fact. The method needs to be more durable.

    I don't think doing what failed previously will produce different results. The US would back the fucking Taliban if it meant fucking with China via proxy war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Chinese-backed Taliban vs US-backed Afghan Maoists let's gooooooooo!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 24 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Lmao I think we'd need some extraordinary circumstances to get that to happen. I doubt various capitalists were unaware of the danger of what they were doing when they secretly backed russian communists because they were competing with tsarist russia. They were pushed to it.

    Not impossible though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago*

    Idk if Bangladeshi women are very liberated. (obviously better than Afghanistan but still)

    there still needs to be a transition from capitalism.

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago

    He put it very vulgarly but that's more or less a point I've read from other marxists, that proletarianization MAY bring about mass politics

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Turn 👏 feudal serf👏 women 👏 into 👏 sweatshop 👏 workers

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago* (13 children)

    Yes, that's what China did. They also used media control to blanket the nation in antisexist messages from the moment the PRC was established, but chattel marriage customs only really began to break down in areas where factory work was available - the wage work allowed women to be financially independent from their clans for the first time. Even establishing dictatorship of the proletariat doesn't mean immediate freedom from the harsh contradictions of being a developing country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    SMH at the anti-dengism ITT.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago

    This is like accelerationism but for creating capitalism

  • source
  • [+] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    I could imagine China using policy demands (similar to what the IMF does, but not evil) in exchange for financing, economic development, but IDK if turning Afghanistan into 18th century England will do much good.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    Mixed feelings on foreign capital investment. I'd want to see the economic proposals laid out first before coming to any conclusions.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So much better than that whole The cowardly Afghani thing from that thread in the dunk tank

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is essentially true even if they didn't explicitly spell out political struggle that women would have to engage in. Actually existing feudalism hasn't existed anywhere for decades. All that shit about Afghani tribes living in a premodern society is just racism. Afghanistan, like most of the world, has a capitalist economy even if you want to nitpick that the superstructure still has feudal remnants. I mean, the UK still has feudal remnants in its superstructure through their inbred German royals, but no one calls the UK some quaint society that hasn't fully embraced modernity.

    And in a capitalist economy, it shouldn't be controversial to say that the prerequisite for workers obtaining political power is for them to join the formal economy, where they can then withhold their labor as workers through worker strikes. Stuff like elevating the lumpenproletariat as the key revolutionary subject makes more sense if we're talking about internal colonies/fourth world where the internally colonized are forcefully denied employment within the formal economy or a (neo)colonial situation where most workers of the formal economy are clerical workers working with the (neo)colonial government in sucking the country dry, but this obviously isn't the case for Afghanistan. Worker strikes imply workers who are part of the formal economy. It's one more tool Afghani women can use to fight for women's rights and dismantle the patriarchy. I'm not sure what's wrong with this or how this is "un-Marxist."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    Actually no, China needs to wage holy war on the Taliban and force them all the adopt the version of Islam that Hui people have. Then they'll have female imams and from there powerful female imams will lead the revolutionary vanguard for women's rights.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›