all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 1 month ago

BBC, London - We haven't done much reporting on this so that must mean the mendacious asiatics have done even less. Probably for sneaky, asiatic reasons. Source: BBC

  • source
  • [–] 56 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    I'm not

    Community notes guys tend to be big "Technically Correct" guys too

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    So it turns out, sometimes technically correct actually is the best kind of correct?

    Well, damn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Sometimes they are also cartoon racists, like that time they basically cited phrenology to explain that Turks aren't white

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    Oh yeah, pedants tend to be real pieces of shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    tend to be

    I ain't never saw you down Traffani's, eating a sloppy steak with your too-tight shirt and slicked-back hair

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 month ago

    The guardian article about it was so ridiculous in this regard as well

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 1 month ago

    Lmao all the sources I've seen analyzing the cause of the disaster were Chinese, without explicitly seeking those out, and on the local eu-cool news they cite casualty numbers given by the Chinese government catgirl-huh

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Its wild. You can go on chinese language news media from China and see them posting about it with video and images

    Then bbc et al take those images and video, repost them and say China is censoring the media

    Fucking insane

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Weird cuz I first heard about this on rednote. I feel like there's a concerted effort on the part of Western governments and media outlets to portray China in a negative light. Has anyone else noticed this?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago

    Of course there is. There is nothing America loves more than a natural disaster or building collapse in China, except of course for a militant insurgency or a real or fake massacre of civilians.

    That's why it's weird that the notes are contradicting it, but that's in large part because they are based on user input.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I’m going to repost the comment I posted in the News Mega because for whatever reason seeing this tripped a fuse in my neural network:

    YouTube launched in 2005, Twitter launched in 2006.

    It’s been 20 years since the start of so-called New Media and these ghouls are still trying to control the narrative.

    Their only answer is to ban Tik Tok rather than adapt.

    When the boomers die off and no one watches the news anymore, it will be a blessed sight to see these places go down.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    People have discussed how they used to have hope in the future of the internet, the "information superhighway" and how it would smash chuds into irrelevancy as the truth became widely accessible to everyone. Obviously 2012-2016-now was a bit of a setback in that as we saw online movements like gamergate and qanon, and even online media like JRE drive a right wing surge that brought Trump to power.

    I dont think optimism is a very popular viewpoint on here, but I think it's all jumped the shark. Fascism actually looks pretty fucking ugly on screen, even if you like the idea of it. We know they are all about aesthetics, but without a centralized media apparatus they have pretty much nothing to run with. Anytime they press lies or spin the truth, it just reduces their trustworthiness.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    It must be so easy to be a western "China expert"

    Step 1: Twist something the Chinese government does that is perfectly normal or even a good thing, and just claim it is actually a bad thing.

    Step 2: If what they are doing is completely impossible to twist into a bad thing, just pretend they aren't doing it, lie about them and say they're doing something else evil and horrible instead.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    jesus fucking christ, nothing is off limits for these freaks

    a tragedy of unimaginable proportions occurs and the first thing that comes to mind for them is "how can we spin this to make china look bad?"

  • source
  • [+] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
    [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Did you know? Although the BBC in the UK is regulated by Ofcom (for all the good that does), the BBC World Service is not under its jurisdiction and therefore does not answer to any regulatory body at all. There is no one trying to keep them honest even on paper, they are fully allowed to lie as much as they want about anything without being held to account and, as we can see here, they do.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Australian broadcasting corp was pushing the same line. I haven't looked into it but would be deeply shocked if it was true - CCTV was screening stories on natural disasters etc when I was in china ~15 years ago...

  • source