555
My bad (thelemmy.club)
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

I either respond within 3s, or two days later. There is no in between.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

As someone who often comes on too strong in the whole friendship thing I recently met someone who is that x10 and I understand how jarring it can be to have a friend who is rather extra.

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

I didn't mean to be a good friend.

[-] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 38 points 15 hours ago

Imagine caring if someone texts you back immediately. Real maturity is recognizing that most adults have other things going on and can't/won't be glued to their phone all day long.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 36 points 13 hours ago

I read the meaning as someone thinking it weird to text back immediately. That was the offense. As if you should play it cool and wait to respond.

I personally respond quickly if I'm holding my phone and the message comes in, usually.

[-] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

I make sure to age my replies. If someone's not dying, give that shit a full 24 hours.

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 28 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Them, 13 Aug: Morning!

You, 14 Aug: Morning! How are you?
Them, 14 Aug: great since I get to talk to you 🙂. How are you?

You, 15 Aug: Great for the same reason 🙂. Want to have dinner?
Them, 15 Aug: love to, where and when?
Them, 15 Aug: Where are we having dinner?
Them, 15 Aug: missed 7 calls from Them.
Them 15 Aug: I'm hungry, are you ok?
Them, 15 Aug: I hope you're ok, call me when you see this, no matter the time, I just need to know you're ok

You, 16 Aug: Morning, sorry, 24 hour rule. Dinner tonight?

[-] X@piefed.world 3 points 6 hours ago

sorry, 24 hour rule. Dinner tonight?

lmao that’s hilarious

[-] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Just enough time to sous vide the roast

[-] 1984@lemmy.today -3 points 5 hours ago
[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 hours ago

You and them can refer to just you and one other. English pronouns get weird.

[-] untorquer@quokk.au 2 points 12 hours ago

Some days they get multiple replies, as a treat!

[-] Alenalda@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

That's dexter so it reads to me like anyone responding instantly is a serial killer.

[-] protist@retrofed.com 1 points 7 hours ago

I thought that was David Fisher

[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Also, I'm happy to text asap if we're planning something. If you're shooting me texts to small talk, I'm happy to chat, but you have to understand that I'll probably only start chatting when I'm really free if it's not important.

[-] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago

You’ve got it backwards. Read the post again.

[-] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

My comment mostly has to do with the 'mature' part, implying that the mature thing to do is to text someone back immediately. And conversely, not texting back immediately is immature.

That said, reading comprehension is not always my strong suit, so fair play. Me brain no work so good.

[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Yeah but like instantly instantly is weird. You kind of expect there to be a period where they free their hands, then check the message, then weigh up whether it warrants a conversation right now, then think what to say, then type it. Could take 30 seconds, could take 3 hours if they're fully busy and you get sidelined.

A reaponse in 2 seconds from cold open always sets me off balance.

[-] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago

You're thinking too much. Instant responses are not weird. Am I supposed to just wait for a bit so that youre wheels don't start turning in the most un charitable direction.

[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

Nobody owes anybody anything man do what you want. Its still weird though. Like when you knock a door and they answer it immediately because they were stood right there. You dont expect it.

[-] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago

I agree that would be weird. Difference is a person is holding their phone throughout the day. Its not a good comparison cause the behavior of standing by the front door waiting for it to knock is unusual behavior.

[-] technohacker@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago

I mean, personally it's because I don't get a lot of messages in the first place, and most of the time I'm just lost in my thoughts and not actively busy so it's a nice change of pace. Now, even I'll admit 2 seconds is a little short, but I'm often ready with a response within 10

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 42 points 16 hours ago

Strange photo to use for this post

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

I'd have used cookie monster.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 7 points 13 hours ago

Educate me please, is this a real thing? Do people delay responses to act cool? In my day, extended chat conversations were a thing and kinda required immediate responses. Does nobody do that anymore?

[-] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago

Probably as long as Snapchat has existed. Especially since they were the first to show your little avatar peaking over the keyboard if you were in the chat at the same time.

[-] restingOface@quokk.au 1 points 10 hours ago

Especially since they were the first to show your little avatar peaking over the keyboard if you were in the chat at the same time.

Snapchat was absolutely not the first to add a "typing now" indicator

[-] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

No no no. The first to add the avatar that makes you look like a weirdo for just being in the same chat but not saying anything.

[-] anugeshtu@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Exactly what I was thinking. It's not that you don't get "immediate" feedback when somebody texts you... either by a sound or otherwise. Why wouldn't you respond to that if you have the time? Although I get it when somebody sends you a thousand messages (or voice ones) in a row. Then I also need a time out.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

I delay texts both reading and responding to not be a slave to my phone or to your whims. I don't owe you immediate gratification. Texts are really disruptive. About 40% of the time that thing you asked me that I didn't respond to you about took care of itself or you figured it out yourself and are maybe better for it.

[-] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

If texts are disruptive then an unsolicited phone call is an affront to all creation

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Sure. Treat them the same way. If you don't VM it's probably not important enough for me to call back. I'll Call you back when I'm driving, its a great time to talk. Also, you're not going to call me about as dumb as a thing as you are going to txt me. The threshold to interact this way is much higher, it's a natural BS screen.

[-] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

Youre old enough that chats didnt have a history, and if they waited long enough, you had to open a different message entirely to remember what you sent them!

Ah the times

[-] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 12 points 15 hours ago

OK, but don't let it happen again

[-] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

apology not accepted. weirdo

[-] snoons@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

Yeah i bet they're on their phone allll the time just waiting for a reply.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago
[-] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 6 points 13 hours ago
[-] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 13 hours ago
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago
[-] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's Will Forte in the role of Phil Tandy Miller in the tv-series The Last Man on Earth, in which he uses the "I hardly knew her" joke intensively throughout the series.

At first it's corny because it's a poor joke, but then he keeps doing it, so it becomes annoying, but then he keeps doing it, so it becomes funny, but then he keeps doing it, so it becomes annoying again.

[-] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

What kind of game is this?

[-] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

One you can't win.

You loose if you text back immediately, and you loose if you don't.

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
555 points (98.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41340 readers
3778 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS