If YOU gave a plushie #31 a real name, maybe they'd be more inclined to help you!!

It's over 8000!

Consent is consent. It's not exclusive to sexual activities.

Extreme comparisons like this have been used since the dawn of time to draw attention to a smaller problems. Just because it's smaller problem, doesn't mean it's not a problem.

In fact, there's nothing in this comic that specifically compares scraping AI to sexual consent. Sure the "ugly" guy is pretty stereotypical of how we represent rapists, but that's just a common association we share, not reality (I have no doubt the artist is fully aware of this).

If we really want to get into this, we can talk about the AI scrapping being done across social media that is adding children to the data set. Do you think everyone ai generating images of children has good intentions? Think their parents give consent for that "use case" when they posted the pictures to Facebook years ago? It's disgusting and should not be dismissed because "its as bad as the real crime".

Oops, I wasn't really doing the math as I went

Originally I was adding up to your 10x + a adding in bunch extra for flock, but somepoint my brain switch that 10x to 10%. Oh well, the specific numbers dont really matter.

I think greater responsibility should be placed on the department to encourage firing. If the burden is mostly on the officer, than the department bean counters won't care as long the officer can write more "valid" tickets to offset the bogus ones.

Its also like if a waiter drops a tray of food on someone causing injury. Who is financially responsible to the injured person, the business or waiter? I think most of would agree that the business is. The business is fully within their rights to fire that waiter, but they can't withhold pay for the damages. If the business can prove the tray was intentionally thrown, then they can sue the waiter. But, the injured party should never have to talk to the waiter.

Should the be the same for an officer, if they make a mistake it's on the department to make it right with the affected parties. If the department proves the officer maliciously broke protocol or law, then they can sue them separately. The victim of the officer's actions should be made "whole" by the department, then the department and officer can figure it out on their own.

Break it down; 2% cop 5% department 25% flock

The extra 20 from flock goes back to taxpayers who had to pay the department's portion.

You could argue it wasn't destruction of property and get the charges reduced.

You'll still get slapped with vandalism or something, but shouldn't be as bad as destroying the unit.

One them eagerly starts unzipping their pants

And he got it.

It's the same with another popular video industry, people thinks that's all normal and expect the same of their partners.

I tired this recipe, not the same. It's missing a dash of love.

Reaper is Linux compatible.

Has the same free trip as winrar too.

I love pineapple on pizza, but I only get it if getting slices for my self or with someone else that likes it.

If ordering blind for a group, it's 1 cheese and 1 pepperoni. If I'm giving the group options it's pick between cheese, supreme, meat lovers and pepperoni (if any one can't eat meat, cheese is forced). If they can't decide, fuck it we're getting pineapple /s