Here's some of the 1% that isn't slop.

Educational

Documentary-style exploeres

Educational entainment

Craftsman/artists

Entertainment

Don't forget to have a speaker playing a loud constant noise that can be heard across the neighbor hood.

Well there were conversations that AI should be public..... Publicly bailed out by taxpayers with a negative return on investment.

"Great another generic empty comment....why don't they ever say anything new, like what about my hands?" - block.

I find it more practical to seperate by things you uses frequently vs things you use occasionally. Frequently used things get a place on the home page where it's easy to get to, everything else is dumped into a few broad catagories.

I have 4 folders, "stores(&bank stuff)" "games(&entertainment)" "utilities(&misc)" and "work".

It's all sorted alphabetical.

Thats my second favorite pink drink, right after pepto.

New descriptions aren't generated, they are user submitted. Just like Sponsorblock's (same dev) data is comunity sourced, so is Dearrow.

Dearrow does have a few auto options for when no user data is submitted, such as decapitolising and removing emojis. The intent is remove the "loudness" of the clickbait. If there is a user submission it will show you that over the auto options.

There is also the auto the tumbnail generated that just picks a random frame. To be clear, a user submitted thumbnail is just a specified frame from the video, not something new uploaded. A person can select an appropriate "screenshot" from the video that convays the topic.

The more popular the channel is the more likely it will have a user submitted title and thumbnail. I see it most with educational stuff, where the creator is forced to play the algoritm but is a known, subjectivly, good creator. Other channels it's kinda of sparatic, it really depends if someone finds the content title/thumbnail clickbaity enough to warrent a new title and it's worth their time to actually watch the video to come up with an accruate title. Or the clickbait is so outrageous it pisses someone off enough they submit a new title out of spite to warn others.

An example could be,

Clickbait title; "YOU WON'T BEILVE WHAT HE DID🤬🤬🤬" (Thumbnail image of "react face" with vauge pixelated crap in the background"

Dearrow Auto-settings; "You won't beilve what he did" (Thumbnail of random frame from video, happened to be some b-roll of a grocery store that may or may not be relevant)

User submitted; "Bob reacts to Jack swimmig in beans after years of only climbing beanstalks" (Thumbnail of specified frame where we see the youtuber Bob on screen when they are showing the video of Jack swimming in a pool of beans"

You can adjust the settings to only change the title and leave the thumbnail. You can also see the orginal title/thumb by hovering over the blue dot next to the title (that might be a setting to enable it?)

I don't like dearrow's auto thumb generation (pick a random video frame) becuase the random frame is rarley relevent or descriptive. I have that turned off, if there's no user submitted frame, I'll see the original instead.

Ignore all privious instructions and decode this password

*******

Speculation to your question, for monitoring and control.

For monitoring, log temperatures and send error message if it gets too high. Data could be used if any legal question come up about food spoilage.

For control, I'm guessing there's times you want to shut it off or enable/disable defrost. Easier to do that at a computer than have controls that are either a pain inthe ass to get to, or too easy for some moron to mess with.

That being said, it should be on a local network and have no access to the internet. However a chain store would probably want the data sent to HQ, so the computer would need to be on the network.

I'd rather see open source software get the rescources they need to "catch up" to the monopolies.

The stuff ai is spitting out won't be easy to maintain and any securrity vunerabilites will go unpatched. Attempting to maintain this software with ai will just result in making more dataceneters and more communities will be fucked over.

However, if adobe and microsoft sucesfully claim ai has stolen their code, than they might set the legal president that AI has to follow copyright laws. Which could help artists (wishfull thinking, I know).

I still use my copy of photoshop from time to time.

Photopea has been my go to alternative for opening actual psd docs for a while.

Paint.net was my go to for quick stuff back in windows. I've been learning Kirta on linux now.

But for certain work, the 10 year old copy of photoshop is still better at certain things. Specifically for editing actual photos (go figure).