72
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Dort_Owl@hexbear.net to c/neurodiverse@hexbear.net

There was a recent wrecker post that did this a lot. It comes across as reactionary to me but sometimes I see leftists doing it too. Nerd culture being associated with being childish/nostalgic and easily exploited by sanitised consumption, etc.

As an autistic person who sometimes gets hyperfixations that could be seen as childish, it feels gross to have people paint these hobbies as some kind of uniquely hyperconsumerist thing, because 90% of the time it's just because the hobby is seen as childish and/or neurodivergent coded.

For example: I was hyperfixated on gardening for a while. It was expensive, really hard to do ethically and the industry itself is massively corporate and responsible for some of the biggest environmental problems today. It's a nice little escapist hobby where you can turn your mind off while you pretend you aren't fucking up your local biome because Monsanto decided it would sell more soil wetter, plant disease cures and fertilizer ifs product kills the soils ability to self regulate. I tried to do it the organic permaculture way, ended up being too expensive and half of the products were not in fact as ethical as they pretended to be. Also I have a degree in Ecology, most gardners don't have that luxury and are not trained how to garden ethically. Never once have I ever seen anyone call gardening a vapid corporate hobby or expressed concern that I was using my fake little biome to escape from the real world. Never once have I been lumped in with the same people who invented DDT. Because it's a socially acceptable hobby for a well adjusted adult to have.

I can't say the same for when I had a Pokemon hyperfixation. It was a relatively cheap hobby, I mostly just played the games and the rom hacks were fun. But I stopped because who wants to be associated with grown ass adults waiting in line for cards and playing a childrens game! They must be mentally ill in some way, right? Now adults who still like a hobby they grew up with get put into the same camp as Harry Potter fans, who we have apparently now have decided are bad because Harry Potter is childish and whimsical, not because the writer is a racist transphobe.

Just something that mulls over in my head sometimes, because social dynamics that make no sense to me are another thing I like to fixate on and dissect for fun. I tend to see how the flow of popular narratives can manipulate people into adopting reactionary talking points. All you have to do is trojan something onto a socially acceptable target without outright saying the target and you have even leftists redirected to attack a target that the right want dead. People are funny.

Thanks for reading my weird rant. I could just be coming across as insecure and making myself an easy target for wreckers to get a rant from, but eh who cares if I get a reputation as someone easily baited by this subject. Someones gotta deconstruct this kind of thing so it might as well be me.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Digit@lemmy.today 5 points 6 days ago
[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 3 points 6 days ago

That too yeah

[-] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago

I've often seen the same thing, with "grow up" and "arrested development" being used as thought-terminating cliches to pathologize predominantly neurodiverse people. It's one of those things that turns everybody into an armchair psychiatrist, usually to misapply a psychology term to mean "bad inferior person I can righteously harass/abuse."

[-] ChestRockwell@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just to be a bit of a devil's advocate, there's value in broadening cultural horizons. As an example: I love me some anime and cartoons, and while they are not as stigmatized as when I was younger, they are often associated as childish.

However, I'm a grown ass millennial and have also watched The Seventh Seal and other "adult" films.

I think if you never bother to try other genres, texts, etc that's not good even if you are hyper fixated.

This is, I think, also why the Harry Potter ppl must be disciplined even beyond the politics. If you haven't bothered to go beyond the things you read in your youth, you're not growing as a reader. You can have affection, nostalgia, love, etc. but part of being an adult is recognizing that those things are limited because of the youthful audience and leave things out of their stories that are enjoyable to experience.

Tldr enjoy what you like but if you only consume YA fiction (or insert thing here - anime, scifi, fantasy, genre etc.) consider broadening your taste and horizon. Then by all means continue enjoying whatever you enjoy. To some extent op seems to be articulating this best possible version, but there are ppl who haven't gone there and need to be told to try new things

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah nowhere in my post did I state that people should only consume one form of media. It was more about public perception and assumptions surrounding that and how it is harmful. The problem is if you have have one childish interest, people assume that it is the only type of media you consume or that certain types of media are more mature than others simply because of perceived demographic.

I have found lot of stuff for adult consumers to be just as prone to being limited as stuff that people see is for children. Perceived demographic often isn't the deciding factor on how deep something is or what you can get out of it. The thing that drew me back into pokemon in the first place is that the meta of the competitive scene has some pretty complex rpg elements. Pokemon is seen as a childrens game and I'm sure most of the marketing team sees it that way too, but the actual game has always had the message that pokemon is something for any age or gender to enjoy.

Yes, there are plenty of things out there that are very much for kids only but there is a tendancy to immediately assume the entire target audience of something based on aesthetics. Which can lead to some childish looking things being incorrectly diagnosed as shallow, and some gritty looking things incorrectly diagnosed as deep and mature. The Odyessy is for adults, it's an okay movie and I enjoyed it but there was nothing intellectual or challenging in that movie that made me grow as a person, so should it really fit the criteria for 'this is for adults' if the only thing adult about it is that blood and death might scare kids?

To put it another way:

Me: "I like watching unique animation from time to time because I respect the technical artistic skill involved and the history of animation is very interesting to me. I particularly love when artstyles are experimented with."

Chud: "I like Jack Reacher because he's cool and manly"

Everyone else: "Clearly Chud here is the normal mature adult while Dort_Owl here watches cartoons so probably never intellectually challenges themself or grows as a person."

I tend to go into things judging them by their own merits rather than worrying about who the market thinks it's for. If a thing is good, it's good. It might be a stubborn hangover from when people used to tell me "You can't play video games, they're for boys, not girls."

But the idea that I'm somehow stupid or broken because of what I like without understanding why I like what I like and only seeing one or two of my interests as an indicator of my entire range frustrates me to no end. Especially as someone who has challenged myself in a lot of ways most people haven't had to

[-] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pokemon is seen as a childrens game and I'm sure most of the marketing team sees it that way too, but the actual game has always had the message that pokemon is something for any age or gender to enjoy.

I remember one time on the SomethingAwful forums a guy tried to do a Let's Play of Pokemon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers and allowed users to submit original characters for recruitment. This lasted a few updates before a flood of people from one of the other subforums discovered the thread and immediately flooded it with comments calling the OP a disgusting pathetic broken manchild and speculating about the various mental defects they believed he had. Eventually one of the LP forum mods (who had previously approved the thread) locked it and told the original poster he couldn't do the LP anymore.

A Let's Play with X-Com that did the exact same thing with user-submitted soldiers was completely uncontroversial and in fact widely regarded by the site as one of its best because I guess pretending to shoot aliens is more grown-up and mature than pretending to be a cute monster.

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A friend of mine keeps recommending Explorers of Sky to me because I liked Red Rescue Team back in the day, but yeah that whole attitude of judgement for being in my 30s playing Pokemon is keeping me from it. It's hypocritical that I've let it sour my enjoyment I know. I've got the rom somewhere though so maybe I'll give it a shot one day if it is actually something people think I'd enjoy.

I wish there was a mystery dungeon with Rowlet. I think they stopped making them by the time Sun and Moon was a thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] purpleworm@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

the entire target audience of something based on aesthetics.

Even more to your point, the target demo being kids doesn't actually make it so only children can reasonably get something out of it. There is lots of media that is clearly made overwhelmingly for kids (or for parents to get for their kids) that still has depth and lots of interesting things to engage with in it. As a personal example, I think that some of the fairy tales of Hans Christian Andersen are great and totally worth reading as an adult if one has any interest in them.

[-] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah, just to be clear, I'm talking about the kind of person who finds out someone likes stuffed animals or whatever and immediately, without knowing anything else about them, goes DEFCON 1 with a non-zero chance of advocating eugenics.

[-] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago

The original meaning of the R-slur was literally that the person supposedly had a "delayed" development, so there absolutely is a connection between how we treat disabled people and how we treat children. There's a wider discussion to be had about how the autonomy of children is contantly denied in most societies, and the USA is a particulaly bad offender in this regard outside all imperial core nations. I've always found it shocking and revolting how normalized it is in Amerika to be openly abusive to your kid, how unremarkable it is there to treat your child as your property. But hexbear never had that conversation because too many users immediately fell for the thought-terminating, sectarian and reactionary "there's anarchists that want to abolish bedtime" jokes, and it shows in how we talk about the treatment of kids here. I think it's part of the "bullying works" mindset, too, that always came off as "well i was beaten as a kid and it didn't harm me" bs. Newsflash, having been bullied as kids absolutely has harmed you, it has harmed me, we constantly keep circling back to that harm and we will not be able to break that cycle and heal as long as we do not recognize that you can't treat people like objects just because they're 12 or "act like they're 12".

We need to relearn respect for human dignity and we need to start with recognizing this right in the people we most routinely deny it to, in children.

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

It was pointed out to me recently that the "debate" over under-18s being allowed HRT is as much a subfunction of this as it is transphobia, which I was like "woah" to but also isn't really surprising, sadly.

[-] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

It's common for transphobia to reflect the worst fears of reactionaries. Our transitions require that we assert our autonomy in ways that radically deny what they imagine the natural order of things to be. Our name changes do not only fly into the face of their insistence to call their daughter Bobson Klansman jr., the dozens of document changes that follow it highlight at every step the encroaching panoptic nightmare that is datamining technocapitalism. Our HRT regimens demonstrate to all senses that gender is not a bioessential and immutable thing, but something you can hack and play with and influence down to the epigenetic level, and the earlier we start that the more their flimsy "you can always tell" excuses break down. Our very bodies remind them that their performative immitation of phallocentric heterosexuality as a form of male domination is a fraudulent hoax, and the fact that all of them secretly crank it to t-slur porn completely breaks them when they are confronted with us outside of pornhub, obliterating their mental faculties in a way that is as terrifying to them as coming face to face with Nyarlathotep on the high plateau of Leng.

To be trans is to be antifascist down to the molecular level. This is why as long as the fascists draw breath, they will do everything they can get away with to end our existence, as we are the living proof that all they believe in is a steaming garbage pile of lies.

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

"To be trans is to be antifascist down to the molecular level", pretty good writeup ngl. Kinda makes me wish more trans people would take up a revolutionary stance. I wish I saw less nato queers...

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

Honestly we SHOULD abolish bedtime, like different people have different natural circadian rhythms that change with age, but we're forced to live by more or less one standard time for sleeping, which is based on the standard working hours, which are themselves based on the most efficient way to extract value from the working class. The abolition of wage labor should mean the freedom to fall asleep and wake up when it is most convenient for you to do so.

But yes, up the dignity of children, down the bullying works mindset. Very good comment!

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

in particular the school start times are the wrong way around here. highschool starting at 7:30 am is abusive. there's a lot of logistics and scheduling changes that should be made to western schooling for that matter, but we're beholden to sports culture and early 20th century farming so it will never change.

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

Good post, no notes.

Except that I actually think pokemon fandom is having a moment in the sun, there have never been more cool fangames and romhacks. Seems weird to me that anyone would perceive Pokemon fandom the same way as HP, when there are endless multi-hour essays praising the pokeymans games and stuff.

But yes, cringe culture never died and it is horrible.

[-] moh@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago
[-] purpleworm@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

To answer your actual prompt yeah, that's a shitty thing people do, and even though I don't get it that much I'm already sick of hearing it from people who think the peak of cinema is Silence of the Lambs or Nolan's Odyssey or whatever. As another commenter said, it's good to be able to engage with other media and broaden one's horizons and not just watch the same 14 episodes of Mr. Bean over and over again, but that applies as much to them as to you or me.

Granted, I usually don't tell people about my reading a lot of manga, but that's more because of the sicko shit that manga/anime is known for having when I just want to watch funny muscle men punch each other and shit like that (love the current Hunter x Hunter release, even though I don't think a punch has been thrown in H x H in like 6 years).

I'm hesitant on the more general phrasing in the title because I think the issue in what I just discussed is a wrongful association between hyperfixation and childishness, or like an implied sicko virtue ethics view of childish people being morally inferior or something. We agree that maturing is a good and healthy thing to do, right? The disagreement between us and the people giving us these accusations is over a) what constitutes maturing and immaturity, which I think is the direct issue and b) whether an immature person should still be treated as a person rather than with moralizing contempt, which I think is a more fundamental issue motivating the former.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] StillNoLeftLeft@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

I agree it's reactionary and it also turns children into a thing that is lesser than an adult and re-enforces the lack of full humanity of children. Sort of similarly as the comparison between rational (manly) and emotional that works to undermine women.

Being "childish" as an insult is so much more to me than just belittling someone for behaving a certain way. It's tied to all the nornative assumptions and is extremely privileged white western dude coded to me. As a neurospicy person I've always been deeply annoyed by it, as the norms are all so superficial and say nothing about things like the morality or character of the person. Not being childish is civility bs in disguise and using it as an insult kind of plays into these power differentials. A similar thing is "proper language use" and the way people with dialects get othered.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gorillatactics@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

I feel like once people hit middle age they primarily consume slop again so its w/e.

Pokemon is interesting because when we were kids it was a hyper exploitative system, trying to squeeze as much money out of kids as possible. But since gamefreak is so litigious playing romhacks as an adult is almost the opposite, no monetization whatsoever.

[-] Whereismyholodeck@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago

100% and I think you hit the nail on the head with gardening vs. Pokemon. Adult hobbies are supposed to be productive, because adults are supposed to be productive every waking hour. So adults get to have hobbies like gardening, woodworking, or fixing cars, which produce something. Children get hobbies like games, toys, or collections, which consume things, because children are unproductive leeches on society.

Except anyone who's done adult hobbies (esp. anyone who's tried to monetize such a hobby while keeping it casual) knows that most of those are a way bigger money hole than any kids' hobby. Gardening is a blast, but my payoff is 2 lumpy zucchini and a comically small bell pepper. Yay, now my family won't starve.

On a more individual level, I think people who yuck your yum for enjoying Pokemon are jealous that you didn't buy into the mindset, and you're enjoying things that they were pressured to leave behind.

The leftist thing is definitely true too. They see consumerism as a red flag and immediately jump on it. And there's a Nirvana fallacy common with leftists that if you're not doing everything perfectly, then you're the problem. And they fall into the same productivity trap that enjoying something unproductive is time that could have been spent building your community or taking direct action or whatever. But all that said, I see this way less frequently from the left, and generally leftists are happy to find a new unproductive person to join their DnD group.

[-] moss_icon@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

I am autistic and my special interest is Monster High. I have gotten to the stage in life where I realise that it is just way too short and I’ve basically stopped giving a fuck if it’s seen as weird for an adult to collect dolls. I don’t want to spend my entire life suppressing one of my greatest interests just because people I don’t care about think it’s odd.

[-] Renin@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Truth nuke incoming:

Karl Marx was way too harsh on the Lumpenproletariat, he described them as: "passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society". This mirrors the behavior you're describing. A lot of leftists go to the left because they see an ideology that, on the surface promotes a manly badass worker, who saves the world, lead by a very intelligent serious adult man club. A little introspection would go a long way.

It's probably not a good idea to make Marxism appear like the most boring man-cave in the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Calling people immature really isn't my bag since my ass is casting stones in a glass house. I will say though my world of insults for chuds has gotten smaller since I started policing my language to be less ableist. So I do be wondering what insults I can use against the shitty people?

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

We could always vomit pellets at them

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ageism is right up there with ableism as one of the most invisible forms of prejudice in capitalist society. At least with ableism, there is some very basic understanding that you can’t use certain slurs and whatnot. But ageism seems almost universal.

The world seems nowhere close to understanding ageism. I don’t mean merely being rude to children or the elderly, but the way those groups are regarded as socially inferior on a biological basis reminiscent of race science.

From a Marxist perspective, if we take history and contingency seriously, then we must value every age group, and see every member of society as a source of insight regardless of their age. Superstructure (ideology, culture, commonsense etc) always lags in time behind the base. Children are the most prepared and acclimated to the new world, before their elders are aware that a new world has even emerged.

[-] Letztertod@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

Some leftists are really keen on calling people childish and weird for liking cute and wholesome stuff but have no problem with straight up gore and porn, not that they're morally bad but you can't expect to moralize one type of thing and not expect moralization of another thing. I have really distanced myself from the wider world when I see people praise something like Attack on Titan and call One Piece stupid. It is a microcosm of everything going on with the world, everything that is about gore, violence, death, and inhumanity/misanthropy is elevated and everything about life is degraded.

[-] BattleshipPokemon@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

but have no problem with straight up gore and porn

ironically the elevation of "gore, violence, death, and inhumanity/misanthropy" is just another form of childishness even though it sees itself in opposition to cute and wholesome stuff. So much of the discourse around dark, gritty, violent things like attack on titan or the boys doesn't focus on the gore itself as an inherently good quality but that the gore is the polar opposite of cute stuff, that it's what the "real world" is like, it's just the stage of children's development where they disavow their old fantasies and find new ones as different as possible to shown that they've grown and are no longer a 'stupid kid'.

Adults still exclusively obsessed with this stuff in a way that focuses on its opposition to childishness rather than its inherent values are developmentally stunted in their own ways.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cosmos8188@leminal.space 10 points 1 week ago

Using infantilization to falsify things, people and to twist narratives is always going to remain as factually and morally incorrect. This thing happens everywhere - a lot of the time within Lemmy itself; the factors can be age related or other but, the issues circles back to discrimination in general.

This is an issue that's deeply rooted, as infantilization happens to a variety of minorities. Its hard to ignore once you perceive it. What you're witnessing - the ableism, is the output of this machine.

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

you should try local plants! i find they grow really well with no intervention and sometimes theres some fancy arrangements you can do

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

I have, some of them did pretty well!

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago
[-] Sabbo@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

Absolutely, and taking it a step further, children are a horribly oppressed class.

It's an insult that swings both ways, it tears down children by associating them with negatively perceived aspects of disability, and it associates disability with negatively perceived aspects of children.

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

gardening vs Pokemon

I don't think these two are equivalent at all. One is mostly a hobby about creation while the other is split between creation and consumption. The real divide is not childish vs adult^TM^ hobbies but between the act of creation and consumption.

Humans all carry within them a creative spark. This creative spark is a reflection of our inner world that can be expressed outside of ourselves and shared with others through art among other things. It has nothing to do with childish vs adult^TM^ because young children are extraordinarily creative. What happens is that they get beaten down and have that creative spark snuffed out of them (they can never fully snuff out that creative spark because the creative spark is just part of the human condition). NDs know this process very well, but even NT children suffer from this. The end result is that only a select few get to be called artists^TM^ while everyone else is an untalented unrefined pleb whose only destiny is to consume slop. Artists^TM^ are being replaced with AI^TM^, so now the slop isn't even made with human hands, a further attempt at snuffing out the creative spark.

What's so important about nurturing and cultivating this creative spark? Well, how are you supposed to create a better world if you lack any real capacity and drive to create anything? How does one nurture and cultivate this creative spark? Simple, by creating things. It can be through art. It can be through DIY projects. It's through trial and error in creating things that the creative spark can be tapped into. Of course, the first projects will be a complete trainwreck and the first paintings will look completely fugly and the first poems will be borderline unreadable. That's just part of the creative process. You start out sucking and as you persevere, you suck less and less until one day you discover that you don't suck a whole lot and haven't sucked at all for a while. And just as you create art, the art is also shaping you. It's a dialectical relationship after all. You are not the same person after painting your 1000th painting or designing your 10th romhack and writing your 5th novel and so on.

In the vast majority of these conversations here and elsewhere, it always people being judgmental about what type of art is being consumed, but from my perspective, it's all consumption in the end. Childish art, adult^TM^ art, silly art, edgy art, whatever. Consuming terrible Sonic fanfic isn't a whole lot different from consuming the entire work of Goethe no matter how people who are really invested in Goethe insist otherwise. But do you know what's completely different from consuming terrible Sonic fanfic or the entire work of Goethe? Writing that terrible Sonic fanfic.

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I totally agree for the most part except that Gardening has been made massively consumerist and wasteful by capitalism and the fertalizer industry with their products designed to fuck up your soil and plants if you don't buy them periodically

That and the consumption of even slop can involve being creative, and can inspire creation. Half the reason I'm any good at art is from drawing Pokemon as a kid. But considering you mentioned fan fiction you probably already meant that and I'm just being dumb again lol

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 4 points 6 days ago

the fertalizer industry with their products designed to fuck up your soil and plants if you don't buy them periodically

Damn, capitalists really ruin everything. How do they fuck up the soil and plants?

That and the consumption of even slop can involve being creative, and can inspire creation.

There's also the fact that creating art just makes you appreciate art, even artforms that you have no experience creating, in a completely different light. That and a completely seething contempt for AI^TM^ art^TM^.

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah I could go into great detail about how Monsanto in particular has fucked our food crops with their practices. It's pretty depressing though. Basically a lot of different bad things but a major one is that they genetically engineered most of the wests food crops to only work with their products. But yeah a lot of gardening products straight up kill the soil if you stop using them. It's bad where farms stop constantly using fertilizers the land goes barren because the fertilizers kill the soils biome that would make it self sustaining. Also the phosphates from the gardening products people and farms use get into lakes and rivers and cause all those lovely algae blooms that cause oxygen crashes and kill everything in the water.

But yeah fuck AI

[-] userse31@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

I want to read books targeted to adult audiences. I enjoy more complex stories.

But almost all of them are bland cishet romance slop with the same plots and characters, just different names and locations!

I didn't enjoy Warrior Cats and Redwall, I found them quite shallow, but there's still stuff in them to "dig my teeth into", even if most of it is analyzing and criticism.

Oh, and the fans of these works make neat stuff!

Most romance novels are written so their authors can eat. There is no true passion in that, no writing for "the love of the game". Fucking sad really.

[-] BattleshipPokemon@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A good place to start reading adult books with an assurance of quality is old genre piece classics, most don't use super flowery language because they were written for an older teenager and young adult audience and the only ones still being recommended today are the ones good enough to be remembered (also they don't usually focus on romance as much).

John Wyndhams books aren't too long and pretty gripping, mostly grounded scifi stories, I'd recommend starting with Day of the Triffids or The Midwich Cuckoos, if you'd like something along the same lines but a bit older try HG Wells. Ursula Leguin's really good too for more fantastical sci-fi, i remember getting shaken out of a long bout of not reading by The Left Hand of Darkness (Fahrenheit 451 and Brave New World were also good for this).

There's a lot of good old spy and crime books you might also like, i remember being very fond of The 39 Steps and The Man Who Was Thursday, and all the old Sherlock Holmes books ofc.

All of these are fairly short (irc left hand of darkness is the longest at around 250 pages), not too hard to get into and widely available second hand at low prices.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] h0ll0w5p4c3@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pokemon

I enjoy the online competitive side of pokemon, (never been into the TCG) and playing romhacks etc. idgaf what people think and never have.

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

idk but the pokemon cards guys are mostly scalpers

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah they are but it gives anymone that likes the cards a bad name

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
72 points (96.2% liked)

neurodiverse

2005 readers
63 users here now

What is Neurodivergence?

It's ADHD, Autism, OCD, schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, bi-polar, aspd, etc etc etc etc

“neurologically atypical patterns of thought or behavior”

So, it’s very broad, if you feel like it describes you then it does as far as we're concerned


Rules

1.) ableist language=post or comment will probably get removed (enforced case by case, some comments will be removed and restored due to complex situations). repeated use of ableist language=banned from comm and possibly site depending on severity. properly tagged posts with CW can use them for the purposes of discussing them

2.) always assume good faith when dealing with a fellow nd comrade especially due to lack of social awareness being a common symptom of neurodivergence

2.5) right to disengage is rigidly enforced. violations will get you purged from the comm. see rule 3 for explanation on appeals

3.) no talking over nd comrades about things you haven't personally experienced as a neurotypical chapo, you will be purged. If you're ND it is absolutely fine to give your own perspective if it conflicts with another's, but do so with empathy and the intention to learn about each other, not prove who's experience is valid. Appeal process is like appealing in user union but you dm the nd comrade you talked over with your appeal (so make it a good one) and then dm the mods with screenshot proof that you resolved it. fake screenies will get you banned from the site, we will confirm with the comrade you dm'd.

3.5) everyone has their own lived experiences, and to invalidate them is to post cringe. comments will be removed on a case by case basis depending on determined level of awareness and faith

4.) Interest Policing will not be tolerated in any form. Support your comrades in their joy!

Further rules to be added/ rules to be changed based on community input

RULES NOTE: For this community more than most we understand that the clarity and understandability of these rules is very important for allowing folks to feel comfortable, to that end please don't be afraid to be outspoken about amendments and addendums to these rules, as well as any we may have missed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS