this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
136 points (90.0% liked)

Games

32417 readers
856 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm sure that, while 17k may be mathematically and technically true, they're going to be virtually indistinguishable. I'm pretty hyped for the game but I also don't care for the obviously clickbait claim.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

In this ending Shadowheart has a ponytail...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree and I suspect companions are carrying a lot of the weight for this calculation.

Hypothetically, if there's 10 companions with 10 individual endings each you'd get 100 endings right there. Add in 10 main endings and you get 1000, add in 4 major side quests and 4 variations each and you're at 16,000 ending variations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Since it's variations of the combined ending, each permutation would count as unique. Meaning that 10 companions with 10 endings each would total 10.000.000.000 variations,

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not entirely sure why, but I don't think that adds up. 10 companions with 10 different endings is a total 100 endings, however there are apparently 1.7x10^13^ combinations if you were to pick any 10. I don't entirely know if I did the math right there.

So you don't have 1000 endings from the 100 total companion endings and 10 main endings, you have 110 total endings.

Either 17,000 is a figure from the various combinations (compare that to Fallout 3's purptorted 300 endings) or there are 17000 total ending "slides." The former is much more likely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless I'm getting the math wrong myself, for any "pick 1" combination set like this we're dealing with just multiplying the combination sets together. Technically we're multiplying by the factorial of the sample size, but 1!=1.

We're not picking any 10 from within the subset of 100; you cannot pick both ending 1 and ending 4 from companion A and then no ending at all for companion C. I'm assuming each individual sub-ending is mutually exclusive with the rest of its sample space. That difference of assumptions is what led to your 1.7x10^13^ combinations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're probably more right than me here, but I'm just not following. Does it matter whether or not to pick 1 from 10 sets of 10 or to pick 10 from a single set of 100? We don't care about what set each individual item came from, just that it's unique and the number of possible combinations.

Edit: Probably just best to dismiss this. I clearly have no idea what I'm talking about.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, it matters. If you're picking 1 out of 10 each from 10 different sets, you get 100 combinations. This also limits the sample space to what is possible.

For simplicity's sake so we can do math that we can intuitively figure out, look at it as picking one from binary choices, with three companions. So you have companions A, B, and C. With possible endings A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2.

If you pick 1 from A, 1 from B, and 1 from C you get 2*2*2 possible outcomes, or 8.
If you pick any 3 from the set of 6 (A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2) you get 6!/(3!*3!) possible outcomes, or 20.

With the former, you always get one ending for each companion. Every companion has an option selected, and every companion does not have multiple endings selected. With the latter, you might get 1 from each companion. Or you might get A1, A2, and B1 — with no endings for companion C, and two endings for companion A.

How can ending A1 "A lived happily ever after" and ending A2 "A died midway through the player's journey, never having found happiness" both happen? They cannot. We need to use a system that limits the sample space to exactly 1 per companion, even if that option itself might be "doesn't show up in the end slides."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

It's nice to know the ending will touch upon your actions thoroughly, but I suspect it will be a lot like the The Witcher 3 technically having 40-something "endings" (but really it's just 3 major outcomes with some variations on the details).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Devs saying stuff like this always makes me roll my eyes. I know games have come a long way, but you say a number that hilariously large and I know, it's going to be silly stuff like the game tracking what people are wearing or some crap and they are counting that as a variation. It's just pretty obviously bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

It's even worse than that because once you see that you just know that all they did was add the ability to mix and match ending tidbits like a damn sectional sofa and let math do all the work.

You can get to 16,000 different endings with something as small as 8 different unlockable characters that each have a unique ending.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

There should be an achievement for beating the game using only sausage as a weapon

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeap. 17,000 marginally different endings in meaningless ways. Probably. I don't know. I saw the headline and rolled my eyes. I should click it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I see it more as, there's 17k stories to be told. You'll likely never met someone IRL that had the same experience as you. Might have had the same major ending, but the resolution to do many other stories will be different.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean, it's just variations of similar endings... I'd prefer what Nier Automata did with their 26 endings. Getting an ending because I backtracked, or because I fished, or because I exploded at a very inappropriate time and place... Yeah that's my kind of multiple endings.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But ultimately, they are just variations of game over screens or just transitions between acts. Actual endings are like 2 or 3.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was 5 main endings actually. Plus maybe another one related with Emil to wrap up other Nier game storyline

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You should definitely play "The Stanley parable" if you haven't yet

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I've never been made to laugh till I had tears in my eyes by a game before

spoiler(following the adventure line / the narrator losing it in the cupboard)

Not the longest, but hands down the weirdest game I've ever played, and well worth the money. Now, where did I leave my bucket?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Good suggestion, it's sitting in my backlog as it is, too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

26 endinga and awesome music

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is a very dumb article. Like, I understand there's a lot of hype for this game right now but jfc. If anyone is expecting to be able to play this game 17,000 times and expect to see something unique each ending, they've lost their damn mind

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I think most people realize that this means the game is going to end up being like Fallout NV, where you have a slideshow ending showing you how your choices affected the roleplaying environment, and that there are a lot of slides you'll end up sitting through. The number seems to imply that you have a lot potential variety of impact.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Or at least they will

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While the writer wasn't obviously talking about so many different endings, it is still an impressive number of variations, highlighting how much the choices players will make will have an impact on the story up to the very end.

So, are we talking something like the equipment on the player during the ending cutscene? Without more details I don't see how this figure is supposed to be impressive.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Probably just some quests that get a "what happened to them"-scene in the ending.

Like Quest 1 can have outcome A/B/C and Quest 2 has A/B

And you already got AA, AB, BA, BB, CA, CB variations, add some more quests and you got 17k outcomes easily.

What matters though is how many major endings there are.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An ending that mentions a yes or no response to 14 things would have 16384 variations. Don't get too excited by this big number. It could easily be just "one ending" where they mentioned the outcome of 14ish things you did.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm gonna be so pissed if I don't get my Mass Effect 3 color changing ending 😤

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah sure... If they just kept it to a sane number like Chrono Trigger did so much time ago, it would be much better. Why are we counting permutations as "different endings"?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It gets C L I C K S

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

And all of them are probably going to be slightly alternate from eachother, but serving no significance. Kind of like those Mortal Kombat endings where each character had a slideshow ending, but just reworded.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So, 17k loose "if" statements defining if some single sentences will pop up during the ending scene.

  • if player has killed love interest -> And the love interest remained dead
  • if player has killed love interest AND ressurrected -> And the love interest died, but got better
  • if player has NOT killed love interest -> And the love interest never died, just as their love

etc etc

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Nobody said that. It is a nonsense number.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

17000? Try 14. 2^14 is 16384.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You don't even need that many 'if' statements. If you're stringing together a sequence of cause and effect binary decisions (as so many RPGs are wont to do), then you only need 14 of them to get over 16,000 possible combinations!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Honestly that's just like 14 different choice points, none of which have to be significant. Every choice doubles the possible endings if they throw a statement about it in the ending

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

They better add a "Kissing a chicken" ending or else I will get really pissed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Man, now I'm gonna have to replay it 17,000 times.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've never played any of the Baldurs Gate games, do you guys reckon I will need to have played the originals first? Cos this games sounds great!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The first two were amazing but long ago, in sure there will be treats for those of us who remember them but I'm sure they'll be expecting a mostly fresh audience.

Just know if you hear 'go for the eyes boo' it's referencing a hamster.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

A dwarf giant hamster, excuse you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Cheers, I'm very excited to give it a go!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I grew up with the first Baldur's Gate games and both are amazing but BG3 seems more of a standalone. I played the early access and I don't see much need to play the first 2, the story is not connected.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That definitely sounds like a bragging point, but nothing something really valuable. Big numbers sound impressive, but do those variations impact the endings in a meaningful way?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I'm really excited for this game but 17,000 different endings just sounds like "yes" and "no" bs

load more comments
view more: next ›