top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (7 children)

More efficiency, more performance. When you are already the best, you don’t need a significant jump in performance. Battery efficiency though? The battery life on these Mac’s is already outstanding, but I will always want more. The dream is a battery that never runs out 😁

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    The dream is a battery that never runs out 😁

    in my home, we do not violate the Laws of Physics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    I just got the 2023 MBP 16" (base model) and honestly I'm insanely impressed with the battery life. I work in the living room from about 8am to 6pm and have ended the day with ~20% battery life. So when they say all day battery life they aren't kidding.

    Obviously if I'm on non-stop zoom meetings or doing more intensive stuff it might not last, but so far its been impressive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    As a developer who spends 99% of the time docked to a monitor though I'd happily take performance over efficiency..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Buy a desktop/Mac Studio. That's literally what they're for. Want or need to work remote? Use an iPad to remote into your desktop for performance. These days the only reason to buy a workstation laptop is if you need performance remotely somewhere that doesn't have good internet or you're mobile 75% of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    What do you use to remote in from your iPad?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (6 children)

    VNC client works well.

    https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/allow-apple-remote-desktop-to-access-your-mac-mh11851/mac

    https://support.apple.com/guide/remote-desktop/welcome/mac

    Edit: I feel like I should add that you should never expose your computer's remote access software to the internet. Use a VPN server or Reverse Proxy setup. Both can be done easily using a Raspberry Pi.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I have the 16 Pro Max that's always plugged in, so I had no idea how good the battery life was. Went to the office a few days ago and forgot the charger at home and was planning on asking people if they got a spare charger. Finished the working day on 25%. That's more than enough for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    If it is plugged in most of the time you might want to consider "AlDente".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Currently waiting for my order. Any Pro or Mac chip is a total overkill for my use, but i still wanted a Pro machine. Awesome to hear that the M3 Pro 16 inch is that efficient. Should still be overkill for my use in even five years time.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    It definitely feels like there was a price jump this series with the base model starting at 8GB, so you have to pay a lot more just to get 16

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    Not really, discounting the 13 inch MacBook Pro that also has 8GB of ram, the cheapest MacBook Pro with Pro chips was and is still $2000. Now the M3 base chip is $1600 for the Pro, and even accounting for the jump to 16GB of ram (nobody should be buying that 8gb of ram model) it's still only $1800.

    Then again the 15 inch MacBook Air is only going to be $100 cheaper than the same specs Pro models. (And why they're redundant but that's another story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    I got the baseline M1 14" and it was £1,800. The equivalent now is £2,100

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    so basically you are saying the 15” MBA at 16GB RAM is not worth it vs the 13” MBP at 8GB RAM?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    The issue is that the 15" M2 Air and the 14" M3 Pro are too close together. The only really save here is that Apple jumped up the M3 to appear in the 14" Pro before the 13" Air this time. Maybe that will be the plan going forward? That Pros get new gen chips first.

    The M3 MBP and 15" M2 Air are too close together with 8GB and the M3 in the new 14" chassis without 16GB ram just isn't good value proposition for an MBP model. Now if the M3 MBP only cane with 16GB or 24gb it would be a slam dunk... but telling people an MBP with 8GB is a bad joke and the upgrade to 16GB is way too expensive in a $1600 laptop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    The M3 MBP and 15" M2 Air are too close together with 8GB and the M3 in the new 14" chassis without 16GB ram just isn't good value proposition for an MBP model.

    I dunno, I think there is a bit of overlap for the 13" MBA and base 14" MBP. Once you spec them for similar internals, it's a $200 difference which nets you the XDR/ProMotion panel, extra cooling, and built-in HDMI 2.1 and SD card slots, while also reducing (albeit not eliminating) the arbitrary external monitor limit.

    The problem is that the base MBA is such a good computer in its own right that it's debatable whether it's worth speccing the internals higher rather than just committing to a slightly more expensive MBP to start.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    M2 air - consumer / light creativity laptop & THE Mac laptop to buy in this price range.

    M3 base 8GB RAM MBP - corporate purchase computer for managers who are running MS office and keynote.

    Expensive for what it is but they’ll claim back some of the sales tax.

    No consumers and genuine pros should ever buy this machine - it’s not meant for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    By the time you pay $1800 for 16gb of ram on the M3 why not add $200 (10% more) and get 18gb on the M3 Pro?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is exactly why Apple carefully designs their pricing strucutre. They want you to think that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yes, they spend tens of millions of dollars designing and building machines they don’t want people to buy, just so they can make a couple hundred more dollars on a different machine. And if the M3 outsells the Pro because most people don’t want to spend $200 for benefits they don’t need, well, that’s, hey, look over there!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I never said they don't want you to buy it, I said they design their pricing structure so you spend more. The prices for upgrades don't often reflect their true value, but a carefully chosen price point by Apple that leaves you in a position to justify spending a little more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Exactly, Apple is always enticing you to upgrade, that $1800 model is decent, but at $2000 you have even more ram (since the M3 Pro is now 18GB) and a slightly faster chip.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    It's a laptop, efficiency should be the number one priority, then performance.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    I didn't check off the flickering option.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    My only complain is the lack of Wi-Fi 7. Considering that a laptop lasts several years, would be great if it comes with the latest Wi-Fi tech.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Sounds like a review where you go out of your way to make the best in class laptop sound just ok.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (6 children)

    Still destroyed on Blender GPU by low end 4050 mobile.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    I think that's the point. If you're doing graphics design or rendering, you should be using an max. Pro is a like office apps, some programming, etc. and the baser model for people that want to play media and browse socialmedia.

    It's a pretty nice lineup.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (9 children)

    I sure would like them to start prioritizing efficiency before performance/features in products like the watch. A two/three day Apple Watch battery would make me far more likely to use it for sleep tracking.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    “Oh look honey!!!! Another wall of numbers that don’t matter!”

    Law of diminishing returns. You can only innovate so much as the generations proceed further.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›