▲ -1 ▼ Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro review - Efficiency before performance (www.notebookcheck.net) submitted 2 years ago by Stiven_Crysis@alien.top [B] to c/apple@hardware.watch 113 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] mi7chy@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Still destroyed on Blender GPU by low end 4050 mobile. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Logicalist@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago I think that's the point. If you're doing graphics design or rendering, you should be using an max. Pro is a like office apps, some programming, etc. and the baser model for people that want to play media and browse socialmedia. It's a pretty nice lineup. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Famous_Wolverine3203@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Got a figure for that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mi7chy@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It's in the linked article. Search for "blender" and it's the second instance that's for GPU. M3 Pro is half the performance of the slowest 4050 mobile to almost 1/3 of the fastest 4050 mobile. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Famous_Wolverine3203@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh. They tested it on blender 3.3🤦🤦🤦. It doesn’t use the M3 RT cores. Only 4.0 has proper metal RT support. Wish notebookcheck actually used the latest blender version rather than the outdated ones. In blender 4.0 the M3 Max is between a 4070 and 4080 laptop. Closer to the 4080. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mi7chy@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago It's already been tested on Blender 4.0. M3 Pro is nearly half the performance of 4050 mobile. And, M3 Max is less than half the performance of 4090 mobile. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Famous_Wolverine3203@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Its tested using blender 3.3. No support for RT cores on M3. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Logicalist@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago I think that's the point. If you're doing graphics design or rendering, you should be using an max. Pro is a like office apps, some programming, etc. and the baser model for people that want to play media and browse socialmedia. It's a pretty nice lineup. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Famous_Wolverine3203@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Got a figure for that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mi7chy@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It's in the linked article. Search for "blender" and it's the second instance that's for GPU. M3 Pro is half the performance of the slowest 4050 mobile to almost 1/3 of the fastest 4050 mobile. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Famous_Wolverine3203@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh. They tested it on blender 3.3🤦🤦🤦. It doesn’t use the M3 RT cores. Only 4.0 has proper metal RT support. Wish notebookcheck actually used the latest blender version rather than the outdated ones. In blender 4.0 the M3 Max is between a 4070 and 4080 laptop. Closer to the 4080. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mi7chy@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago It's already been tested on Blender 4.0. M3 Pro is nearly half the performance of 4050 mobile. And, M3 Max is less than half the performance of 4090 mobile. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mi7chy@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It's in the linked article. Search for "blender" and it's the second instance that's for GPU. M3 Pro is half the performance of the slowest 4050 mobile to almost 1/3 of the fastest 4050 mobile. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Famous_Wolverine3203@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh. They tested it on blender 3.3🤦🤦🤦. It doesn’t use the M3 RT cores. Only 4.0 has proper metal RT support. Wish notebookcheck actually used the latest blender version rather than the outdated ones. In blender 4.0 the M3 Max is between a 4070 and 4080 laptop. Closer to the 4080. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mi7chy@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago It's already been tested on Blender 4.0. M3 Pro is nearly half the performance of 4050 mobile. And, M3 Max is less than half the performance of 4090 mobile. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Famous_Wolverine3203@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Bruh. They tested it on blender 3.3🤦🤦🤦. It doesn’t use the M3 RT cores. Only 4.0 has proper metal RT support. Wish notebookcheck actually used the latest blender version rather than the outdated ones. In blender 4.0 the M3 Max is between a 4070 and 4080 laptop. Closer to the 4080. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mi7chy@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago It's already been tested on Blender 4.0. M3 Pro is nearly half the performance of 4050 mobile. And, M3 Max is less than half the performance of 4090 mobile. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mi7chy@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago It's already been tested on Blender 4.0. M3 Pro is nearly half the performance of 4050 mobile. And, M3 Max is less than half the performance of 4090 mobile. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Famous_Wolverine3203@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Its tested using blender 3.3. No support for RT cores on M3. permalink fedilink source parent