251
submitted 19 hours ago by 0xebfe@lemmy.today to c/aviation@lemmy.world

United Airlines is preparing for customers who may object to flying into an airport named for President Donald Trump, and reservation agents have been authorized to move those passengers to Fort Lauderdale or Miami without charging more.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

We need to pass a Federal law that it's illegal to name anything after Trump, no airports, buildings, monuments, highways, bridges, etc. - with ONE exception: Sewage Treatment Facilities. That way, when you pass through that stinky part of town near the train tracks, you can say "I smell Trump."

Or maybe "Trump smells bad today."

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

His name is already slang in the UK for fart.

No sewage plants for him either, lest he besmirch John Oliver's name.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 41 points 17 hours ago

Know what else is free? Not going to Florida.

That's cool as long as you don't have to travel for work.

[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 7 points 12 hours ago
[-] jabberwock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago

I'm getting tonal whiplash after their attempt to kick a guy off for wearing a shirt that criticized bombing children.

For those OOTL

[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

I like his line of questioning. Unfortunately it requires a level of self awareness on the recipient's part that not many people have.

[-] newton@feddit.online 31 points 19 hours ago

Drop 💩💩 on mar a lago

[-] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago
[-] kcuf@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

That's just trump getting his spray tan

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

If I was tasked with painting his taint, I'd want to do it from as far away as possible too.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 22 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

i'd go even further, and give a $17.76 refund for all that do change their tickets to an alternate airport. the crybaby loves symbolism, and he'd lose his shit even more when it's used 'against' him.

[-] HobbitFoot 23 points 19 hours ago

Given that United has a hub in Fort Lauderdale, I'm sure they are more than happy to focus traffic at their hub.

[-] ElJefe@lemmy.ca 28 points 19 hours ago

Whatever the reason, I think it’s absolutely beautiful that they’re giving their passengers the option to say fuck you to the pedophile petty president poopy pants. All airlines should offer this service.

[-] deacon@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

United does not have a hub in Fort Lauderdale. IAD or IAH are probably the closest hubs to Fort Lauderdale; that’s DC and Texas respectively.

Not to detract from your point. Publicly traded companies are self-serving by design, and this is no exception. It is still a risky move to do anything that is seen as poking the Trump bear though. It’s definitely a calculation.

Fun fact, speaking of IAH and DC, and its other airport DCA. both were renamed after a former president, but neither had their three letter city code changed; something that is a massive and complicated undertaking.

PBI is the first airport to be renamed for/by a living serving president, and the first one whose city code had to be changed for the new name.

Pure fucking ego.

[-] ElJefe@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago

poking the trump ~~bear~~ baby

FTFY

[-] HobbitFoot 3 points 15 hours ago

United does not have a hub in Fort Lauderdale.

It is in the process of building one after Spirit's bankruptcy and increasing regional demand. United is starting a direct flight from Los Angeles to FLL and is planning on using FLL as a base for flights to Africa and increased service to the Caribbean. Also, if United can push for a people mover to connect the airport to the nearby Brightline station, that would open up the entire Central and Southern Florida region via one United hub.

I agree with everything else you said.

[-] deacon@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

It’s a big investment and expansion but I don’t think it’s a hub. More like a test balloon.

I’m not close to this one but Delta did something very similar in MIA back in the early teens. I’m speculating at this point so if you’ve got better facts let me know, genuinely. I’m a relative insider but not close to network strategy or CRE so this is mildly informed speculation.

First off, both Delta and United would love to have a hub that far south and east. Delta has ATL and United just has IAD and IAH. IAD needs relief for sure.

Set aside trying to horn in on MIA (not totally infeasible as AA is weaker - especially on their international fleet if memory serves), the airport that makes the most sense by far is MCO - especially for United. But high rents and local costs are probably prohibitive.

FLL is motivated to attract new tenants so it’s very likely that United has a deal with something like no landing fees for the first year - which is how Delta operated an LHR flight out of MIA for a year as a comparatively low cost experiment.

This was all human generated by my faulty memory and very limited expertise in this area of aviation - so take it all with a grain of salt.

[-] HobbitFoot 1 points 12 hours ago

The problem with MCO is that Orlando doesn't want a hub airport. The entire economy is based on tourism and having a hub doesn't help unless the hub is owned by the government.

FLL needs a new tenant who could treat the airport like a hub. Delta has ATL and American has MIA. JetBlue has a presence there, but likely not enough to fill the lost capacity unless it gets a massive capital injection. That leaves United and Southwest.

United is the airline that has the quickest ability to fill the void and has a long term route strategy which can use an airport like FLL, including off-loading some international traffic from IAD.

[-] deacon@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Yeah I think I agree with all of that, so it really does comes down to the semantics of the first statement.

I would say pedantically it isn’t a hub yet, only the most likely next hub, but you’re right for the purposes of your original comment.

[-] javasux@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Why does every article suddenly have a "Conclusion" section these days?

[-] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 14 hours ago

Because the AI that wrote it is also stealing academic papers.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 30 points 19 hours ago
[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

I'd say that and people's extreme lack of attention span in 2026. "If we summarize it, maybe people will click on our articles instead of asking an LLM to summarize it."

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 6 points 18 hours ago

or they're simply trying to tell the machine to use the provided, pre-written tl;dr when they do 'summarize' instead of hallucinating their own.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

I'd say the other (much less likely) option is that writers are starting to emulate the bullshit machines.

[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 0 points 12 hours ago

They've been having conclusion sections for a lot longer than that. It's just how every american school and college told kids to write essays. But they're absolutely offloading the work for it to LLMs now.

[-] Hairyfishnuts@feddit.online 8 points 19 hours ago

Lawsuits coming.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
251 points (99.6% liked)

Aviation

647 readers
349 users here now

Anything related to aircraft, airplanes, aviation and flying. Helicopters & rotorcraft, airships, balloons, paragliders, winged suits and anything that sustains you in the air is acceptable to post here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS