274
United Airlines Will Let Passengers Avoid Trump Airport And Switch To Miami Or Fort Lauderdale For Free - Live and Let's Fly (liveandletsfly.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/aviation@lemmy.world
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

United Airlines is preparing for customers who may object to flying into an airport named for President Donald Trump, and reservation agents have been authorized to move those passengers to Fort Lauderdale or Miami without charging more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

United does not have a hub in Fort Lauderdale.

It is in the process of building one after Spirit's bankruptcy and increasing regional demand. United is starting a direct flight from Los Angeles to FLL and is planning on using FLL as a base for flights to Africa and increased service to the Caribbean. Also, if United can push for a people mover to connect the airport to the nearby Brightline station, that would open up the entire Central and Southern Florida region via one United hub.

I agree with everything else you said.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    It’s a big investment and expansion but I don’t think it’s a hub. More like a test balloon.

    I’m not close to this one but Delta did something very similar in MIA back in the early teens. I’m speculating at this point so if you’ve got better facts let me know, genuinely. I’m a relative insider but not close to network strategy or CRE so this is mildly informed speculation.

    First off, both Delta and United would love to have a hub that far south and east. Delta has ATL and United just has IAD and IAH. IAD needs relief for sure.

    Set aside trying to horn in on MIA (not totally infeasible as AA is weaker - especially on their international fleet if memory serves), the airport that makes the most sense by far is MCO - especially for United. But high rents and local costs are probably prohibitive.

    FLL is motivated to attract new tenants so it’s very likely that United has a deal with something like no landing fees for the first year - which is how Delta operated an LHR flight out of MIA for a year as a comparatively low cost experiment.

    This was all human generated by my faulty memory and very limited expertise in this area of aviation - so take it all with a grain of salt.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The problem with MCO is that Orlando doesn't want a hub airport. The entire economy is based on tourism and having a hub doesn't help unless the hub is owned by the government.

    FLL needs a new tenant who could treat the airport like a hub. Delta has ATL and American has MIA. JetBlue has a presence there, but likely not enough to fill the lost capacity unless it gets a massive capital injection. That leaves United and Southwest.

    United is the airline that has the quickest ability to fill the void and has a long term route strategy which can use an airport like FLL, including off-loading some international traffic from IAD.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Yeah I think I agree with all of that, so it really does comes down to the semantics of the first statement.

    I would say pedantically it isn’t a hub yet, only the most likely next hub, but you’re right for the purposes of your original comment.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent