top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 176 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Funny how they're trying so hard to catch pedos not won't arrest a single motherfucker in the Epstein files

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    That's not true; they arrested one!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Only because they really wanted to already. Boo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Also they kinda killed him so he couldn't talk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 123 points 2 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 61 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Jesus. I'm not in the EU, but how is this the first I'm hearing about this?

    Time to go back to email and GnuPG.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    Because they're trying to suppress the public reaction.

    You won't hear about this on prime-time TV news, and it’s even censored on some more popular parts of the internet, like Reddit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    nah i just think that lots of people are tired of hearing about it. since it's an issue year-over-year, they're just waiting until we're getting tired about it. then they'll sneak it in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    yeah i keep thinking, we're not getting around the law. we have to get around an effective implementation though by using 3rd party platforms, i.e. ones that don't conform to legal pressure. i keep thinking we need to inform people¹ about ways of secure communication in the absence of big-platform support. i.e. how do we send encrypted messages outside of facebook. we need matrix chat with end-to-end encryption that actually works, does not rely on a central "identity confirmation" service but works end-to-end. So instead of saying "i want to connect to bob@server2.net" and looking up the bob@server2.net public key somewhere, you should ideally get the bob@server2.net public key directly from the other user, if you have the chance to meet them irl. it's the only way to actually secure end-to-end communication.

    [1]: Note. This is very important. do NOT under no circumstances come up with the stupid ridiculous and outright dangerous notion that you're gonna convince large masses of the population to care about their privacy. there needs to be a bit of elitism in this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 60 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Never forget that Epstein was talking about fucking children in plaintext on Gmail and they did nothing whenever you see politicians say encryption should be illegal so they can capture criminals.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    If they wanted to do anything about pedophiles, they could.

    Motherless is in the Netherlands, an EU country, right? A website that has hosted child pornography for more than a decade (Amanda Todd killed herself in 2012)? They took it down for a little while after that whole “global network of guys raping their sleeping partners and uploading it” thing earlier this year, but it’s up again. I doubt it would take more than 10 minutes to find illegal content on there right now.

    It’s all a farce. It’s entirely possible to target individuals making and distributing CSAM, but it’s much easier to do nothing and use it as an excuse to spy on citizens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 37 points 2 months ago (19 children)

    If I ever, ever somehow end up living in a world where it’s not possible to communicate with someone digitally and be completely encrypted, if we get to a point where you MUST put your ID into signal and have the government scan all signal messages, I’ll probably just kill myself.

    And take a few politicians with me at the very least.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    ... where it’s not possible to communicate with someone digitally...

    I'd be thrilled to go back to that, if what we're getting now instead is the only other option. But, I grew up in the before-times, so I'm not so put off by the idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    You're still getting surveilled in real-life conversations ... if anyone in the conversation is stupid enough to bring their phone or other 'smart' device (including any modern car).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    better idea: communicate irl. and also we need proper end-to-end encrypted chats that exchange public keys from device to device directly (NFC or QR code) (which requires physical meeting).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 months ago (15 children)

    I say, “Arm up and kill authoritarians.” Likelihood is that you’ll also kill lots of pedos at the same time.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    To be fair they do seem to think it would really catch pedophiles; why else would they exclude themselves?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 22 points 2 months ago

    I will never not be the guy in the bottom-right corner

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    It's already done Sir. Our private data is again being scanned by US corporations to protect our children.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    *fucking. You can type fucking on the internet. Don't worry, we won't tell your mommy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    How can they stop me from just doing this: U2FsdGVkX19+NGkQMc6FHt46SCVJ0SWyaPd8zo6lqiZ3V0H+IbR/EKhIt9B+o8Bu

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 months ago

    Time has come for moving towards !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com Politicians be Politicing too much with themselves in mind.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Where will we run when the whole world burns?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    here we go once again to being fucking embarrassed to be European.

    the first try of this made me stop voting altogether because all the fucking parties on my country were a YES. Fuck politicians, hope they all get killed.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    As an american using Proton, shit

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Proton is swiss. Switzerland is not EU so they're not affected

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›