92
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

AI will assess if they are looking at the road and, depending on speed, give a warning if they don't.

And I am totally sure it will not misread someone turning their head to secure a lane change going 220 km/h on the Autobahn and will not spook them with a sudden, unexpected alarm sound making the driver jerk the steering wheel causing a horrible crash.

[-] LinkeSocke@feddit.org 30 points 1 week ago

You talk like the whole Problem doesn't already start with a AI Camera filming you the entire time in your face. Modern Cars already sell a lot of data about you. Much more then you expect a car to know about you. Yea give them my facedata and a Videofeed of me... great idea...

We don't even need to talk about how these signals can spook someone. Such cameras should not be in the car in the first place

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

The law mandates that data processing must happen locally.

That said, fuck these new systems.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Does it mandate that no other data processing can happen while sending it somewhere else?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] egrets@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

The rental cars I've used in Europe in the last few years are absolutely relentless with their warnings; it just becomes noise that you ignore.

It thinks you're not watching the road, it thinks the speed limit is 30kph when the signs say 80, it doesn't like that you've crossed into another lane to pass a cyclist, it's warm outside, it's cold outside, the person who just got into the car hasn't finished putting their seatbelt on, the bag on the back seat hasn't put its seatbelt on, your parking spot is within a meter of another car, the tires are 32 PSI instead of 33.

Alarm fatigue sets in really fast.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago

It's not like LLMs will be doing this - they just get lumped under the same vague "AI" label. I believe these types of systems are much more reliable. I'd also be surprised if the warning is anything as obnoxious as to cause the driver to jerk the steering wheel, because that would be a problem even if it is correct.

[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago

I know there are reliable AI applications, for example cancer recognition models scanning CT imaging.

However, from what I know systems trying pattern recognition in human behaviour are the opposite of these medical implementations.

[-] glasratz@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I know there are reliable AI applications, for example cancer recognition models scanning CT imaging.

Those are not reliable at all and only meant as hints for the radiologist to check certain areas twice. They do not identify cancer but spots that may be out of place. However, not all radiologists seem to know that and a relative of mine would have been pushed into end-of-life care if not for the intervention of another doctor in the family. He had to take it up to the head of department, though. The spots in question turned out to be old scarring and could have been easily identified if the radiologist had also consulted older scans as would have been her damned job. Instead she thought the AI was thinking for her.

Similar software also exists for spotting tooth cavities. It's useful, but not to be trusted.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 4 points 1 week ago

Those signals are as subtle and obvious as all other signals a car can give. This system has already existed for many years and already exists in many cars. You can easily ignore it.

[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago
[-] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Technology is god and will solve all our problems. At least in politician’s minds.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Boingboing_r@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

I read the other day that laws are being passed by people with chauffeurs for people who drive cars and I cant get that out of my mind.

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago

That exactly is the problem with most laws passed these days. The political caste is so disconnected from normal everyday life of normal people that they aren't even impacted directly by them anymore, so even if they wanted to, they can't make normal laws for normal people.

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

You can thank the European car industry for this. They've lobbied for this to become law.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Probably, but it's certainly more complicated. Fiat complained about the added cost of such systems. On the low budget end, this adds a noticeable chunk to the price. Bad for sales in the EU, added complications for export. I could imagine the "premium brands" like such regulations that remove some competition.

The yahoo post in OP is a press release by a Swedish tech company that makes such systems. They're not exactly part of the car industry, but they claim to have lobbied for this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Notice how these "Liberals", even after watching America fall to fascism and their own domestic resurgence, are continuing to implement all the tools necessary for big brother style totalitarianism? How they're continuing to implement big brother FOR fascism?

It's almost like they work for the same interests...

[-] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A shame that most people don't seem to grasp something so simple as that.

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Are you using "liberal" in the US sense here or in the correct sense?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] 87Six@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

My 2001 car is looking more beautiful than ever

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Cars built much later than 2010 are pretty much all piles of junk by design. Unrepairable, unmaintainable, technically owned by the manufacturers rather than their owners.

[-] 87Six@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

The 2 downvotes are automakers

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Or professional enshittificators.

[-] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Given that my 2004 Chrysler had the battery behind the front wheel I’m gonna go ahead and need you to caveat that.

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Some manufacturers were ahead of their time with enshittification.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not entirely true. The EU mandates a "driver drowsiness and attention warning". It doesn't mandate the use of cameras. The word "camera" is not mentioned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

The EU obsession with expanding their surveillance state is insane.

[-] timestatic@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

Can't I just tape the fucking camera? Whats the point of this?

[-] B0rax@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

No you can not. If you do, it will trigger an emergency stop after a minute.

And no, I am not kidding. I have tried this on a new car just a few days ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago

Another reason not to get a car again!

[-] sniggleboots@europe.pub 9 points 1 week ago

Riding a motorcycle has never felt so free

[-] Humanius@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Recently I accepted a new job, and it will come with a new company car.

If I happen to get a model that was sold after this rule goes into effect, I'm planning to tape off the camera.
Hopefully that should be enough to "fool" the systems in question

[-] 87Six@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

I hope you will enjoy the constant chime going off and the constant alerts on the dashboard

[-] B0rax@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Don’t worry, taping the camera will result in the vehicle braking to standstill after a minute. (No joke…)

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

My experience with driver aids and safety systems is limited to 2023 models but the implementation of everything from skid control to lane centering depends so much on the manufacturer’s implementation. My observation from a limited number of cars is that stability control quality scales with vehicle price, but reviews indicate that the ADAS does not.

I’ve driven two vehicles from the same company with the same features and different shape (ie bumper and windshield height) and one consistently “lost” view of a flatbed truck, which isn’t confidence inspiring.

Like reversing cameras, the products range from potatovision 480i to 4k UHD.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Since July 7, all new vehicles must have an "advanced driver distraction warning" (ADDW) system. That means that there will be a (probably IR) camera constantly monitoring the driver. AI will assess if they are looking at the road and, depending on speed, give a warning if they don't.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM%3AC%282023%294523

[-] BigShammy80@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago

My cheap Suzuki Swift from last year has this already. It warns me when i look around, being tired and so on.

It is not very accurate i might add...

[-] kbal@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

Weird. Is this a typo? They must've written "mandate" where they meant "prohibit" or something.

[-] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

Duct tape has a new fan now.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

This only works if the car drives at all without 'detecting' a driver.

[-] B0rax@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

You think nobody thought of that? The vehicle will refuse to drive if it can not see you.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 5 points 1 week ago

Startling drivers while operating a vehicle on the road. What could possibly go wrong?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
92 points (96.9% liked)

Europe

11596 readers
678 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS