[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You know how these AIs output tokens? I'm going to explain the concept with words, because that makes it easier to understand. But it means that the explanation is [ETA:]NOT quite right.

An AI has a vocabulary. The words in that vocabulary are assigned to 2 groups.

Sometimes when the AI is outputting something, it could use different words equally well. It's not quite the same as having synonyms, cause this isn't really about words. But let's say you have synonyms in those different groups. At those points in the text, you can pick from one group or the other to embed a hidden pattern in the text.

Limitations are obvious. To embed the watermark, you need enough opportunities to pick "synonyms". It won't work for very short texts, or if the word choices are very constrained.

I'm curious if the negative effects are really as minor as they say.

111
[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Natural gas. In the EU that is classified as sustainable, green energy. Or maybe that's only if it's sourced from Russia. Common regulatory W.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I'm glad that you're not distressed. You clearly feel strongly about the issue, though, and I don't really understand why or how.

Some people will prefer the original sources when they come out. But I understand why you would want to wait for someone to put the pieces from the different parties together. I do the same on most issues.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

It's more background on how the HuggingFace hack came to happen.

You should listen if you are concerned with cybersecurity. Otherwise, it's just interesting if you're curious.

I posted this in an AI community. If you find AI distressing, that's not on me.

4

Leider nur auf Englisch, aber echt interessant.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

May I ask what the use case was?

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Deswegen muss der Staat eine Regulierungsbehörde haben um...

Ach. Das waren die Aufseher vom Staat.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Looks like we need to regulate the regulators.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Ragebait? Verspäteter Aprilscherz?

338
Seems AI generated? (thelemmy.club)
21
34
32

Axel Springer SE is a European multinational mass and online media company, based in Berlin, Germany. The company is organized as a societas Europaea (SE) publishing house and is one of the largest mass media publishers in the European Union, with numerous multimedia news brands such as Business Insider, Politico, The Daily Telegraph, or the price comparison service Idealo.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axel_Springer_SE

189
93
36
27
188

Looks like some have to the come conclusion that the problem in "1984" was the dangerous lack of surveillance. This is a left-wing (Labour) government, btw.

Stuff like this is why I no longer want regulations to protect us from big tech. Thank you very much.

-19

Amazing.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago

I didn't need that mental image. But since you have installed it in my head, I am honor-bound to upvote.

sigh

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 110 points 1 year ago

List order may not reflect order of importance.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 125 points 2 years ago

Seriously, why are they producing all these great promo shots for him? If they had done that for someone like Bernie Sanders, the US would be in much better shape now.

(explaining the title reference)

view more: next ›

General_Effort

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago