I'm trying to figure out which model they used based on the style of the UI, but I can't quite pin it down.
Looks like ARC-AGI 3 is just about saturated. Womp Womp
Actually, on second thought, there may be a small significance. If encrypted messages are intercepted by interested parties, they are probably archived for later. If anyone used that kind of encryption (like 30 years ago, I guess) then they should assume their stuff has been read if it seems worth an effort. Maybe it also serves as a warning for the future about current encryption.
No practical significance. The pros make sure that encryption stays ahead of the possible.
They got you hoodwinked there.
They don't like to talk about it, but the US founding fathers were raging leftists (although that terminology didn't exist yet). The framers of the constitution had no intention to create a class of intellectual landlords extracting rent from the people. That is why copyright is strictly limited in the constitution.
[the United States Congress shall have power] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Clause
The language is archaic. Useful Arts means inventions and Science means knowledge. The economic consequences of copyright are very much at issue.
That AI training is (generally) Fair Use is a no-brainer. It's actually much harder to justify copyrights for entertainment products.
That never made any sense. Commit a felony to present your company as a dumpster fire?
The hack doesn't worry me. It was a shock to see SciFi turn real, but not a cause for concern. The message board as a factor in model training is a little concerning.
4397328654844826923795068102505872571721883526553349659561256924505973939597593482272505698004801207988043088656411102133523080581 divides RSA-260
What people really need to deal with is the underlying issue here.
AI reverse engineered Direct2D and created a working (though janky) Linux implementation. That capability is not getting any worse. You also see other projects doing this, like that Mario Kart port.
You will see a lot more of this in the future. People putting out new drivers for vintage hardware. Ports and level editors for ancient games ...
It's doubtful if opening the code would have helped. It wouldn't have helped bring wine up to spec. The only option that would have opened up is a fork without direct2d requirements.
The crucial thing here is that Claude reverse engineered direct2d and created a linux implementation of the relevant parts. That that's possible is something the copyright maximalists here will come to terms with. The AI haters will have to cope with the fact that AI is indispensably useful and will only become more so in the future.
Give it a few more minutes.
ETA: I don't usually lob grenades like this, but this is an issue people need to deal with.
Eine weniger technische Zusammenfassung: https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/openai-huggingface
You know how insanely stupid those right-wingers are? Have you ever wondered if maybe there are some who are so stupid that they don't know the difference between left and right?
