Natural gas. In the EU that is classified as sustainable, green energy. Or maybe that's only if it's sourced from Russia. Common regulatory W.
I'm glad that you're not distressed. You clearly feel strongly about the issue, though, and I don't really understand why or how.
Some people will prefer the original sources when they come out. But I understand why you would want to wait for someone to put the pieces from the different parties together. I do the same on most issues.
It's more background on how the HuggingFace hack came to happen.
You should listen if you are concerned with cybersecurity. Otherwise, it's just interesting if you're curious.
I posted this in an AI community. If you find AI distressing, that's not on me.
May I ask what the use case was?
(In case someone has been living under a rock in the last 48 hours. Anthropic's new model "Mythos" has been finding a lot of new vulnerabilities. This is about patching one.)
I didn't need that mental image. But since you have installed it in my head, I am honor-bound to upvote.
sigh
List order may not reflect order of importance.
“I'd far rather be happy than right any day."
"And are you?"
"No. That's where it all falls down, of course."
― Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy
Seriously, why are they producing all these great promo shots for him? If they had done that for someone like Bernie Sanders, the US would be in much better shape now.
[French media] said the investigation was focused on a lack of moderators on Telegram, and that police considered that this situation allowed criminal activity to go on undeterred on the messaging app.
Europe defending its citizens against the tech giants, I'm sure.
This is a brutally dystopian law. Forget the AI angle and turn on your brain.
Any information will get a label saying who owns it and what can be done with it. Tampering with these labels becomes a crime. This is the infrastructure for the complete control of the flow of all information.
You know how these AIs output tokens? I'm going to explain the concept with words, because that makes it easier to understand. But it means that the explanation is [ETA:]NOT quite right.
An AI has a vocabulary. The words in that vocabulary are assigned to 2 groups.
Sometimes when the AI is outputting something, it could use different words equally well. It's not quite the same as having synonyms, cause this isn't really about words. But let's say you have synonyms in those different groups. At those points in the text, you can pick from one group or the other to embed a hidden pattern in the text.
Limitations are obvious. To embed the watermark, you need enough opportunities to pick "synonyms". It won't work for very short texts, or if the word choices are very constrained.
I'm curious if the negative effects are really as minor as they say.