Sorry, your English isn't always quite clear.
You're saying that they will have to create that security layer that you call API, before releasing a modified Siri AI in the EU. Right? Which means that you don't see either what Apple could have done to roll this out now in the EU.
Why would I make the case? That would surely be a huge waste of time. You're not asking any questions. You don't want to know, right?
But ok. If you want to share, I will read it. What did you make up in your mind about this?
Das gibt doch keinen Sinn. Mal ganz abgesehen davon, dass das technisch nicht funktioniert: Warum sollte Meta das tun? Das ist ein Milliarden-schweres Haftungsrisiko.
Why do you believe that? Where did you "learn" that?
In your comment it is responsible for both locking down and preventing locking down.
As I wrote, it makes no sense.
MacOS doesn't fall under the same DMA requirements, so that's why it still gets Siri AI in the EU.
I've been wondering if this would be more dangerous than installing random apps. It might be. But they don't let people install just anything on iPhones. "Proper" computers are traditionally more open.
Because parents vote?
Apple seems to think that they have made Siri AI safe enough. We'll see if that is true. Apple is sure taking a risk here.
If Siri AI is not safe, then the idea to make third party assistants safer would not work either (by the sound of it).