Even legal requests that are formally legally binding will be denied if Reddit deems them unlawful.
That's quite ballsy, actually.
Ob das wohl mit Europarecht vereinbar ist?
Can you see the political implications?
Government jobs can provide a floor on pay and conditions
So every other job must be preferable in pay, conditions, or both.
There's one thing about such a provided job that must be clear. It is the worst job in the whole economy. If you thought your job was worse, you could quit and take that guaranteed job instead. Either that guaranteed job is sub-minimum wage or more grueling than free jobs.
I’m talking about a program that is separate from welfare, it is voluntary, where the person chooses they want a job and the government provides it.
I doubt such a thing is politically sustainable. That is, paying welfare to people who chose not to accept a job being offered. Something to think about in connection with the above.
The wiki article notes that the 1936 constitution of the Soviet Union had a job guarantee. It also had this (in a rather more prominent place):
ARTICLE 12. In the U.S.S.R. work is a duty and a matter of honor for every able-bodied citizen, in accordance with the principle: "He who does not work, neither shall he eat."
The principle applied in the U.S.S.R. is that of socialism: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."
Zeigt deutlich wie dysfunktional die Digitalgesetzgebung in Europa ist. Aber an den Gesetzen kann man nicht rütteln. Kein weiser Mann würde dem Kaiser Nacktheit unterstellen. Also sabotiert man eben die Durchsetzung.
Depends what you mean. I did a quick check and found that the UK has various programs that help disabled people find or keep jobs. I guess that many NEETs would qualify for such programs on account of psychological conditions.
If you are talking about recipients of benefits, the UK does have workfare programs.. (No more Roads to Nowhere, at least.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workfare_in_the_United_Kingdom
If you are asking why people are allowed to live off their savings rather than being made to work, then that's because forced labor is generally considered a human rights violation.
I could see that you were lacking some important background information, so I helped you out. Anything else you need?
One rarely builds a dedicated power plant for a single building. It is more efficient to build large power plants for general use and use cable to transmit the electricity to where it is needed.
GOS is not part of a theoretical future.
It's called symbolic AI, or sometimes GOFAI for good old-fashioned AI. It's no longer considered AI by the wider public, it seems. I believe those techniques are still widely used, but they have reached their limit quite some time ago. Cyc was maybe the high water mark of that approach. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyc
At the very least, you'd have to convince both the US and China to stomp it out. And then there are other countries that would be willing to pick up the slack.
4397328654844826923795068102505872571721883526553349659561256924505973939597593482272505698004801207988043088656411102133523080581 divides RSA-260
view more:
next ›