325
submitted 1 day ago by Noja@sopuli.xyz to c/europe@feddit.org

Chat Control is not dead. The EU (still) wants to scan your private messages and photos

The "Chat Control" proposal would legalise scanning of all private digital communications, including encrypted messages and photos. This threatens fundamental privacy rights and digital security for all EU citizens.

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

Fuck sake, it has been told time and time again that this is a bad idea!

[-] manuremy@sopuli.xyz 16 points 19 hours ago

They will push until it eventually goes through. I'm in the tinfoily prepation mode, better get a head start than act surprised in a few years when this finally passes.

[-] zemo@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

How have you chosen to prepare for this?

[-] manuremy@sopuli.xyz 7 points 18 hours ago

Nokia prepaid dumbphone as my main, not any fancy remade stuff but a really old brick with new battery. I'm hoarding DVD's, games, music and books. Making my own digital copies of them. Learning to use all the services the local library provides. Slowly building a new Linux PC that will eventually be turned into an offline DVD-player that runs basic games. (I can then do banking and such at the library PC or in the actual bank.)

You don't need to play along, but you can if you choose to.

[-] EvasiveSpecies@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

I'm not very knowledgable about technology but ever since all of this + the push of ID verification online around the globe I've started to grow a small analog collection of games/books/DVDs. It's the easiest way to prepare oneself for worst case scenarios even if one doesn't know every detail.

[-] manuremy@sopuli.xyz 4 points 15 hours ago

Absolutely! It brings peace of mind. And here used CDs and DVD's cost around 1-2€ per piece so when the streaming services just keep deleting their content and jacking up the prices at the same time, it feels whole lot better and saves money in the long run. It's fun to exchange movies with the friends too! Or to bring a physical disc to a movie night.

I have bought a few boardgames too to play with the family and friends. It something I have just thought that "it could be fun" but never have gotten around to or actually bothered to play.. Now I have gotten around and bothered and it has been a lot of fun!

[-] zemo@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

But a dumbphone surely has no encryption. Texts and calls over GSM can be readily read by the carrier and government. You would have to be extremely diligent not to slip any information that would identify you, but even if you dont you are still creating an alternate persona for data gathering entities.

[-] manuremy@sopuli.xyz 2 points 15 hours ago

So? You think I say or write anything important on the phone? Why would anyone? It's for "on the way honey" or "honey do we need more beer?" kinda communication. For proper communication I write letters, emails or meet in person. Phones are the most suckiest way of communication.

[-] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

Unfortunately, they only need to succeed once...😞

[-] elvith@feddit.org 90 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm completely pro chat control. To make it more accepted, we just need to show that it's a good idea and lead by example! That's why I propose, to completely publish all communications of our politicians and those that they communicate with. This content trove will be reviewed with AI* to make sure that there are no bad guys hiding in the government, right? As always, if they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear!

* AI - Audience Interest: every one of us is free to analyze everything and publish and discuss their findings publicly.

^/s?^

[-] plyth@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago

How is it possible to get parties into power that put this into law?

[-] elvith@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago

Just lobby and bribe harder than those guys that want to see Chat Control happening ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Chat are we cooked?

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 53 points 1 day ago

The price of liberty is eternal vigilance..., but fuck, every goddamn year?

[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Yup keep going guys it's not going to get easier but fighting for your freedoms and principles is important.

Just look at what apathy gets you as an alternative. Just rejoice in the fact that you have access to lawmakers and you can influence the process by being active.

It seems like shit but one we give in then it will pass.

Write to your mps sign some petitions, it seems like a chore but store then you care.

[-] Eq0@literature.cafe 19 points 1 day ago

More than that! Last time was in October/November it i remember correctly

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Gorram, seemed nearby. There needs to be protection against lobbyists (could stop here) pushing the same crap that got shot down already, again and again. Throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks is for bluesky development, not governance.

[-] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For a few, true freedom requires the enslavement of many.

The liberal democratic experiments are dying at the hands of their own owners. Turns out History didn't end.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

For a few, true freedom requires the enslavement of many.

The needs of the many outweigh the desires of the few. With guillotines if necessary.

[-] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, but the few have bought all the guillotines already.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

Business opportunity! Ikea Guillotines!

[-] alakey@piefed.social 56 points 1 day ago

I really wish there was some sort of rule that stated that if your proposal failed it gets blacklisted for the next 10 years, regardless of the framing of the proposal.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 32 points 1 day ago

Wouldn't work either as they are -very obviously here- just ignoring the rules anyway.

[-] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago

If they can ignore it it's not a rule.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

No, it just means that there is noone to enforce it.

[-] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

A rule that isn't enforced is a rule that doesn't exist. No matter how many words are written on a paper.

[-] shrugs@piefed.social 38 points 1 day ago

Ffs, the world is collapsing and we talk about this kind of shit...again.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Epstein class, that is causing the world to collapse, is also behind chat control and age verification.

They're gunning for totalitarian dictatorship.

[-] DdCno1@beehaw.org 4 points 1 day ago

The more unstable the world becomes, the more frequent and aggressive moves towards authoritarianism will be.

[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

What was the method again to ensure that undead vampires do not leave their grave after their burial? Seems a little ritual needs to be added to the proceedings....

[-] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

On the bill or the politicians?

[-] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 14 hours ago

Both, both is good

[-] MacAnus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago
[-] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

How do they plan to get past encryption?

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago

They will make it illegal, or they will force mandatory backdoors into it. It will be hacked within days, and they will blame “left wing extremism.”

[-] mimavox@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago

Probably mandatory scanning on device before encryption. Will destroy all privacy focused apps.

[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 10 points 1 day ago

In this case, privacy-focused apps would just not implement it, as it's the voluntary chat control "1.0" which we already had before. Of course, it would probably be used to eventually have another go at the mandatory scanning again.

[-] gopher@programming.dev 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Yes, I'm a bit less worried about chat control "1.0" as it at least still allows one to choose services that don't participate (I seem to recall reading somewhere that no encrypted services actually reported anything under 1.0 but have no source for it). Of course it is still not good.

Biggest problem is that they are also discussing chat control 2.0 that would force privacy focussed apps to basically shut down or comply.

[-] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good ol' moving the overton window.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The easiest would be to let the OS grab the keys of every connection and transmit them to the government.

For everybody with their own OS, they can use the backdoors on the chips to get the keys.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

This kinda shit makes me glad we left. Then I look at our own government, it's just as bad!

[-] Noja@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 day ago

Sorry but the UK is still like 10x worse even if Chat Control would pass.

[-] DdCno1@beehaw.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, the UK adopted 1984 as an instruction manual ages ago. I last visited it almost 20 years ago, but even then, the level of public surveillance alone was already ridiculous.

Just another tuesday in the corrupt union :(

See you next tuesday suckers.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
325 points (99.4% liked)

Europe

11434 readers
850 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS