[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

See, and that's the fundamental problem. The AfD will never get an majority. But the allegedly center conservatives are parroting every AfD line, all while at the same time having leaders very vocal about no cooperation with the far-right yet constantly normalising the idea of said cooperation via backbenchers suggesting it without any backlash.

Guess what... the nazis also never got a majority but came to power via delusional conservative that seriously thought governing with fascists would reign them in.

Our problem is not primarily a far-right too stupid to actually govern or a minority that is too stupid to not vote for them anyway. It's the run-of-the-mill conservative that has no ideas, no solutions to any modern problem and is happily jumping onto the populism bullshit train to get to power anyway.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 40 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)

Wasser in der Mikrowelle wird von innen nach außen erhitzt. Was zu explosionsartigem Überkochen führen kann, den im schlimmsten Fall das Glas nicht überlebt. Der Löffel, der drinsteht erhitzt sich schnell, sorgt für Bläschenbildung am Metall (so wie es sonst am Topfrand passiert) und bricht nebenbei auch die Oberflächespannung.

Das Risiko durch einen massiven Metalllöffel in der Mikrowelle ist hingegen zu vernachlässigen. Das braucht es normal schon ungünstige Reflektionen zwsichen Metall... (Wenn du wirklich deine Mikrowelle per Funkenschlag kaputt kriegen willst, leg 'nen Ball aus Alufolie rein...).

Deshalb haben viele Mikrowellen heutzutage sowas als Warnung:

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 50 minutes ago

But how many € get delivered into the pockets of the fossil fuel industry our politicians are working for? See... there's the reason why it won't happen.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 53 minutes ago

Super massive and amphibious doesn't sound like ever getting out of the Baltic Sea.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 5 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago)

Die Regierung kämpft gegen Demokratieprojekte und -bewegungen, Grundrechte und stellt gern mal Demonstrationsrechte in Frage...

Und die Witzfigur, immerhin Mitglied einer der beiden Regeirungsparteien -ja, auch wenn offziell ruhend-, meint als Bundespräsident verkünden zu müssen, dass es mehr Engagement der Bürger benötigt? Ist das noch Satire oder schon Bosheit?

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

The famous "If we don't exploit and destroy our planet hard enough someone else might do it and get some short-term benefits out of it" race to the bottom...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

But do you also have another ~25% party that pretends to be center conservative yet is already happily copying every far-right propaganda and culture war narrative and exactly a handful of changes in leading positions away from ruling side-by-side with the them? One with a voter base so brain-dead that they will always vote for them anyway...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

BSW

They are actually the exact same bunch of xenophobic populists, just more fans of the Russian authoritarian style where the AfD is trying to emulate MAGA.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 0 points 1 hour ago

Wait? Aren't we also boykotting passwd because it has an optional field for your complete real name?

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

So wie das dort aussieht, wohl nicht. Aber tatsächlich sind die Reflektoren, soweit ich weiß, optional. Reifen mit einem im Dunklen reflektierenden Streifen auf der Seitenwand tun es auch.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 8 points 9 hours ago

Der tägliche Einzelfall von Korruption in der Union...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Debian daring to suggest that using your real name to identify yourself on the system is a reasonable choice for most people. So get the torches and pitchforks...

Also don't tell those people about the fact that such fields for additional information (like real name, address etc) exist in most user-handling parts of their software since forever.

You get asked for your real name when creating a new user for longer than Linux even exists. It's just that noone actually cares. But now that's suddenly an horrific anti privacy policy because the narrative demand that it is.

26
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Ooops@feddit.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

# serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

Which works well.

And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

So long story short...

How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

view more: next ›

Ooops

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago