[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago
[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 1 hour ago

Was soll man denn über den deutschen "Bürokratieabbau" auch noch reden? Die Bürokratie wurde jahrzehntelang kaputt gespart, bis gar nichts mehr geht. Nebenbei sollen die selben verbliebenen Leute auch noch die Digitalisierung wuppen (also maximal das selbe analoge Scheißsystem mit Dateien jetzt auf Festplatten statt in Aktenordnern), damit man noch mehr sparen kann. Und die Lösung, weil nicht mehr geht ist noch härter einsparen und es wieder "Bürokratieabbau" nennen.

Wer es immer noch nicht geschnallt hat (siehe: der deutsche Wähler) und immer noch auf die selbe Scheiße hereinfällt, dem ist einfach nicht mehr zu helfen (wieder: der deutsche Wähler).

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 1 hour ago

Wir brauchen die in der Tat nicht.

Die CDU hingegen braucht die AfD sehr. Erst, um andere mit "macht was wir wollen, oder wir snd gezwungen mit denen zusammen zu arbeiten" zu erpressen, solange es geht. Und letztendlich dann, um mit der AfD zusammen zu regieren.

Dementsprechend machen sie ja auch seit Jahren ununterbrochen Wahlwerbung für die Blauzis.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago

Aber es hilft halt nichts, wenn Akkus zwar gebraucht werden, aber niemand sie wirklich kauft, weil die alle seit Jahren auf Genehmigungen für die groß angelegten Energiespeicher warten. Alles, während unsere Regierung gerade daran arbeitet, wie man die jetzt nach all der Verzögerung noch schnell abwürgen kann.

Deutschland schießt sich halt mit Begeisterung immer und immer wieder in den Fuß, heult dann kurz, warum die anderen alle schneller laufen können, und kommt dann zu der Erkenntnis, dass ein größeres Kaliber sicher die Lösung ist.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Actually they just need to EVs.

But they won't as lobbying for corrupt politicians and media to tell the lie how ICEs are totally viable forever because thermodynamics don't exist and synthetic fuels will solve all issues is cheaper in the the short run than actual work. And in the long run... no one cares because those people then will already have moved on to the next companies to destroy for short-term gains.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Can you stop telling the same lie again and again?

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Their detailed "plan" to grow 6 industries actually includes sabotaging battery production on the grid level for their fossil fuel industry buddies, sabotaging battery production in EVs by constantly spouting desinformation about the viability of ICEs via synthetic fuels (same,same...). And every talk about AI and biotech is just a pretense to press the topic of demolishing data protection to sell our medical data (sadly their electronic patient file project is sich a disaster that noone tries to buy the data when it's leak left and right constantly anyway) as well es every other private information. Fusion (alongside fission) is just another fairy tale to keep people doubting renewables, again just to keep the oil, gas and goal burning up.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Is that really that different?

Conceptionally yes. You can refuse to unlock your phone with your face. You cannot refuse to allow Google to access your account (and thus your phone, too) with a picture of your face -no matter how bad the tech is- if Google implements this.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Das ist weniger ein Versäumnis der Moderne als eine Leistung derer, die von der Verbreitung falscher Ideale und der Unterdrückung von Alternativen profitieren.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I know Lemmy is very anti-AI

No, Lemmy isn't very anti-AI, just very sane.

AI is a tool. If it does the job better than other tools that's totally okay. It has so much potential to improve lives.

If on the other hand it's about artificial general intelligence soon™ hallucinations, "we can totally replace all skilled workers"-fairy tales and other "stop using your brains and eat the slob"-bullshit it just needs to die... alongside the ~~company CEOs~~ snake oil buyers who (not so secretly anymore) dream about getting rid of all those pesky workers they have to pay proper wages.

And sadly 99% of the narratives we are constantly fed (and yes, that includes such "See Linus now supports AI! AI's winning!!" bullshit stories, when it would be the perfect starting point to actually evaluate AI properly just once...) belong to the second category. Because AI companies in their insanity painted themselves into a corner. Their investments are insane, their market models unsustainable and telling the lie that everyone needs to use their AI and get integrated everywhere-even if it makes zero sense- is basically their only way to salvage something from that shitshow.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

It's a continueous process to find more an more objects that defy the classic distinction to invalidate old models.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

Ich hab selten so sehr gehofft, dass das Satire ist, wie beim Lesen dieses Titels. Wann kommt endlich der große Meteorit und macht diesem ausgemachten Wahnsinn ein Ende?

35
submitted 1 month ago by Ooops@feddit.org to c/unixporn@lemmy.world

25
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Ooops@feddit.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

# serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

Which works well.

And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

So long story short...

How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

view more: next ›

Ooops

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago