overview for Ooops

A shocking backroom deal is underway to revive Chat Control 1.0 this Friday by Ooops in c/europe@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 3 hours ago

No, it just means that there is noone to enforce it.

E-Bikes weniger hitzefest als E-Autos? Was man beachten sollte by Ooops in c/fahrrad@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

Mein Fahrrad ist auch so schon nicht hitzefest. Wie ich heute festgestellt habe, quietscht die Federgabel bei über 35°C lautstark... 🫤

EU ministers plan further climate policy rollbacks during historic heatwave by Ooops in c/europe@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Now? Not much.

The actual main measures so voters don't fall for stupid bullshit against their interests (education and proper journalism) already failed. In big parts because the propagandists prepared well by buying out a lot of media and defunding education.

Most "EU alternatives" lists stop at the name. I built one that doesn't. by Ooops in c/buyfromeu@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

"European alternatives to the US tools you already use. Pick a US tool to see the vetted European alternatives."

And under this a field with said US tools: Dropbox, Google Drive, AWS, OneDrive, Gmail, Outlook, iCloud, Hetzner, Azure [and more...]

So German Hetzner is somehow a US tool with 11 alternatives ("How do the 11 European alternatives to Hetzner compare?"), of which one is Hetzner...

A shocking backroom deal is underway to revive Chat Control 1.0 this Friday by Ooops in c/europe@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 21 points 11 hours ago

Wouldn't work either as they are -very obviously here- just ignoring the rules anyway.

Most "EU alternatives" lists stop at the name. I built one that doesn't. by Ooops in c/buyfromeu@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Nice to see that Hetzner is a good pick to replace (German) Hetzner because a European Cloud Hoster defnitely needs a European alternative... 🤣

EU ministers plan further climate policy rollbacks during historic heatwave by Ooops in c/europe@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

How do we get responsible politicians?

Easy: Pay them as much as the industry they are actually working for. Oh, you don't have enough money for that? Well, it's your problem (and entirely your fault) that you are too poor to matter.

On a more serious note: People seem to believe that voting more and more for screaching morons promising burn the planet faster while at the same time rolling back every positive development of decades is the way to go. So the actual answer is you won't. Because in a democracy the majority is calling the shots and sadly that majority is criminally stupid.

German appetite for Russian cod puts EU fish sanctions at risk by Ooops in c/europe@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

"We don't know any actual facts who is opposing these sanctions, but these are the 4 biggest importers of fish of last year and 'Germany bad' is always a best seller, so here's your headline..."

today's media quality

Schwarz gemalt: Deutschland als „Krisenland“ bei der russischen Nachrichtenagentur TASS by Ooops in c/dach@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

Wo ist die Nachricht? "Germany bad" ist nicht nur in Russland, sondern auch überall sonst, inklusive im eigenen Land, eins der beliebtesten Narrative.

Some DMs just want to watch the world burn by Ooops in c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Promote more six-packs...

Das "Heusenstammer Modell" könnte den Radverkehr revolutionieren, wäre da nicht die Straßenverkehrsordnung by Ooops in c/dach@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Ihr streitet darüber, wie die Umsetzung in der Realität aussieht, weil exakt da der Knackpunkt liegt. Die Maßnahme dort funktioniert, weil sie zu Testzwecken vernünftig überwacht wird. Die selbe Maßnahme wird nicht funktionieren, wenn es keine Überwachung gibt (oder Ordnungsamt und Polizei demonstrativ daneben stehen und Raserei und Gefährdung abnicken - keine Ahnung, wie ich gerade darauf komme... war wohl eine Eingebung auf Grund der hiesigen neuen "Fahrradstraße").

Deshalb gibt es auch in Deutschland ständig langwierige Projekte zum Test von Dingen, die in anderen Ländern schon lange problemlos funktionieren. Die Prüfen halt meist das falsche, denn es reicht nicht zu wissen, ob eine Maßnahme funktioniert. Es gibt hierzulande nämlich oft immer noch den zusätzlichen "Wir ignorieren einfach Regulierung/Verordnung/Gesetz, denn Autos sind heilig"-Faktor.

@Nukular@feddit.org

[META] Should AI disclosure tags [AI], [NOT AI] be mandated when sharing projects? by Ooops in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 86 points 3 days ago

A mandatory [AI] tag? Sure.

A [NOT AI] tag? No, that's the default. Why normalise AI bullshit even further?

34

the boring one running on my ancient toaster for many years [i3, transparent xfce-panel over conky as bottom bar] (thelemmy.club)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Ooops@feddit.org to c/unixporn@lemmy.world

1 comments fedilink

26

Need some ELI5 on proxy_pass in Nginx, in particular regarding having Anubis in the chain (feddit.org)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Ooops@feddit.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

11 comments fedilink

As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

# serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

Which works well.

And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

So long story short...

How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?