[–] 1 point 5 hours ago* (1 child)

No, you said these videos show common mistakes on purpose because real users would make them. Which is okay...

But it doesn't matter if it was an honest mistake or one made on purpose because it's a common thing.

Ignoring the chat telling him the problem (and that he caused it himself) and also not mentioning the problem's origin anymore later was not an accident. Given the fact that he later made some offhand comment about "yeah, shader thing again" he understood the problem yet intentionally chose to not include the explanation in the video but leave it at "on Linux there are random freezes I don't understand".

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 5 hours ago (1 child)

    When you look around your room do you not see a plethora of goods made by polluting industries?

    No, but yeah some trees died for furniture. 🙄

    Do you travel exclusively by foot?

    No, also by bike and public transport. Which partly is still running on fossil fuels (although still vastly more efficient per person) because brain rot (or money) tells people in the relevant positions that greener alternatives don't work or are inefficient.
    Even for people actually dependent on cars it's not real facts that keeps them chained to rediculously oversized cars running on inefficient combustion engines. That exclusively based on propaganda, paid by the people that want to keep selling fossil fuels.

    Do you eat only foods that can be brought to your area without refrigerated trucks?

    Mostly actual... but that isn't even the point. I talked specifically about the big chunk of pollution that is burning fossil fuels. Are you trying to tell me that you can't transport those electric (on the last mile), by (also electrified) train and that you can't run the refrigerators on green electricity somehow?

    None of us are willing to give up the computers or network infrastructure

    Which was very much not my point. What I was talking about is people's unwillingness to use greener and also more efficient alternatives for a lot of things. Not based on facts. Not based on the unwillingless to go without them completely. But 100% based on loud, constant, paid screaming that those alternatives don't work and are more expensive and really, really don't solve any real problems other that stopping the massive burning of fossils (but shhh... don't talk about that small detail).

    I really don't understand your focus on computers and networks that actually have a lot of pros, too, when people not willing to give up their city-tanks or three dozen throw away plastic bags a week (although there are alternatives in no way worse) and often also voting for idiots clinging to fossil fuel power plants and car infrastructure above anything else are also a big problem. Ones we could actually easily solve yet don't because paid narratives are running the show.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

    I would at least pretend to learn from my mistakes. So when I skip the shader compilation, then experience freezes while shaders get loaded and the whole f***ing chat mentions it, letting them compile first and then seeing if that fixes the issue would be in fact the first thing I would try...

    So no, this is not honest "showing common mistakes other people will experience" or "struggling with basics". Because if it was honest there would be any mention of the underlying issue once he understood it. And he obviously did, judging by a later offhand comment about "yeah, shader issues..."

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 10 hours ago* (5 children)

    Instead we get a ton of benefit out of pollution

    No, the producers of fossil fuels get a ton of benefits in the form of money. You get health issues, climate change and desinformation (paid by a fraction of those big amounts of money) telling you how the clean and more efficient alternative isn't working and so you will have to suffer if you chose the alternative.

    Also the polution's drawbacks from global climate change to your personal health problems aren't real... or they are real but not as severe as people claim... well actually they are severe but we can totally fix those easier than transitioning away from burning the planet... okay maybe we can't fix it but totally demolishing our economy by not killing the planet would be much more expensive... and so on, ad infinitum ad nauseam.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 13 points 10 hours ago

    No, that one is just brain-damaged by all the propaganda.

    The paid stooges are far ahead and don't actually question stuff but plain out claim that it is indeed a hoax. One to kill all industry, tech and even people out of ideological insanity. Why else would they try to build green power production that obviously doesn't work and even reduce CO₂ when we all know that plants need that CO₂ to survive? 😉

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago

    People either reject messages they don't like and hate the correspondent outlets OR people don't ever see information that would contradict their view and couldn't stomage it either.

    Pick one. You can't have it both ways. That only works in your favorite narratives based on massive amounts of cognitive dissonance but not in the real world.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago*

    Was meinst du, wem du damit hilfst?

    Der bei Verstand gebliebenen Minderheit, um sich im Klaren zu sein, was kommt, und rechtzeitig rauszukommen. Und später hoffentlich der Strafverfolgung, wenn wieder alle so tun, als hätten sie von nichts gewusst.

    Denn für Blauzi-Schreihälse oder die "Wir sind völlig normal und bürgerlich und kreischen nur rein zufällig alles nach, was die Faschisten sagen, und wir wollen auch gaaaanz sicher nicht mit denen reigeren zwinker zwinker*"-Rechten in Deutschland entscheiden sich zusammen mehr als 50% aller Wähler, nach Sitzen dann gerne 2/3. Dem einzigen, dem man hier noch helfen kann, ist der deutsche Wähler: mit Therapie. Denn sich nur 80 Jahre später wieder nach Niedergang und Trümmern zu sehnen (oder so dumm zu sein, den Zusammenhang nicht zu verstehen oder zu leugnen) lässt sich nicht anders einordnen als als Geisteskrankheit.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

    Data protection is actually a misnomer. Protecting your data is just a tool to protect you.

    And so the GDPR does not only protect your data. It also protects you from things like profiling or automated legal decisions based on existing data.

    For example a health provider is of course allowed to collect and save you health information. Analysing their huge data set and deciding that you are statistically a risk patient and terminating your contract is still very much illegal.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 23 points 1 day ago*

    Der Titel ist mal wieder 'en glatte Lüge.

    Wie profitable Entwicklungshilfe ist, ist lange bekannt. Sie ist nicht profitabler "als gedacht", sondern nur profitababler "als das populistische, rechte Gekeife unserer Regierung gerne behauptet".

    (PS: Das selbe gilt übrigens auch für praktisch alle anderen Themen inklusive dem Klimaschutz. Das völlig offensichtlich kostengünstigste (oder, wie hier, gar profitable) Verhalten wird als zu teuer verworfen, weil Akteure mit eigenen Interessen das der korrupten Politik so vorgeben.)

  • source
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›