[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 25 minutes ago

Nee, so lÀuft das in Deutschland, plus vorsoglicher Disqualifikation von Teilnehmern, wenn deren Beitrag zu beliebt ist.

In anderen LÀndern sind die Vorentscheidungen, wer dahin geschickt wird, tage- oder wochenlange Events mit tatsÀchlichem Zuschauerinteresse und -beteiligung.

So albern ich die damaligen BeitrÀge fand und Stefan Raab nicht leiden kann... komischerweise waren prompt alle erfolgreicher als das, was Deutschland sonst so dahin schickt.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 41 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)

"Sorry, wir haben leider kein Geld ĂŒbrig fĂŒr zu klein geratene Menschen, die nicht einmal etwas leisten. Denn sonst bezahlen uns GroßaktionĂ€re und MilliardĂ€re nicht mehr fĂŒr unsere gute Arbeit."


ihr Kanzler zweiter Wahl

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 5 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

Medien bestimmen durch die Berichterstattung, worĂŒber sich Menschen mehrheitlich aufregen, oder zumindest durch die Wahl, ĂŒber was berichtet wird, welche Dinge als "laut und prĂ€sent" warhgenommen werden.

Auch Medien: Wollen uns erklĂ€ren, warum wir uns "in Wahrheit" ĂŒber manche Dinge mehr aufregen...

đŸ€Ł

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago)

Have in mind that compressed filesystem would be slower.

Often the opposite is true, depending on case. Compressed files load faster, so if you have the cpu power to spare (which you usually have in games while loading) and loading speed is the bottle-neck then compression speeds things up, often considerably.

And even in the age of ssds processing data and moving it through ram is much faster than the disk, so even for writing some amount of transparent compression is possible without affecting speeds.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

But it never stops there. It's never just "securing supplies" during the transition time. The next step is always: But it's cheaper if we do long-term contracts. Followed by, saving money that was meant for the transition because it's obviously not a pressing issue with long-term supplies "secured" (in parantheses because it's never actually secure, just planned long-term).

Oh, there is a long-term demand? Guess then doubling down on drilling even more will work, too.

And this is literally going on for decades already.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago

Might be just my experience but what actually keeps people from switching is a proper support time line. Long-term and rolling releases can keep people using them for years after which they actually know what they want, what they can get used to and they don't wanjt. Most distros however screw up something at the inevitable upgrade long before that, which then leads to "well, guess I could reinstall and try something else anyway".

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 8 points 12 hours ago

Oh no, how can the corrupt right wing parties people voted for do corrupt right wing party things fucking us over for money exactly as anyone with two working brain cells knew beforehand? đŸ„±

Wouldn't it be nice if voter's propaganda-induced brain damage wasn't forcing them to fuck themselves (and everyone else) again and again and again...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 12 hours ago

Oh, they don't actually use it themselves. So the correct thing to say is doubling down on oil and gar makes them richer, fuck everyone else stupid enough to buy

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 12 hours ago

That's bullshit. The rapid transition is a way towards energy security. This is just another way of slowing down said transition because every drop of oil we don't burn isn't making a few people richer at our expense.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago

Argumente sind ĂŒberholt. Heutzutage geht's nur um noch LautstĂ€rke und Wiederholung.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago

Korrigierter Titel: Verfassungschutz bekÀmpft Verfassung

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

Die Behörden verfĂŒgen bereits ĂŒber umfassende Befugnisse, die fĂŒr effektive Strafverfolgung völlig ausreichend sind

Aber wenn sie nicht mehr massiv Geld und Arbeitskraft in illegale Überwachung investieren, mĂŒssten sie ja mit tatsĂ€chlicher effektiver Strafverfolgung anfangen...

26
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Ooops@feddit.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

# serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

Which works well.

And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

So long story short...

How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

view more: next â€ș

Ooops

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago