[-] Ooops@feddit.org 8 points 3 hours ago

Ab irgendeinem Punkt wird "technologieoffen" halt albern, weil jeder mit 2 funktioniereden Gehrinzellen weiß, dass es nur Code ist für "einfach weiter wie bisher und so tun, als wenn jeden Moment eine neue Technologie vom Himmel fällt, durch die das nicht bekloppt ist und im Untergang endet".

Und wenn man erstmal soweit ist, müssen die Worte keinen wirklichen Sinn mehr ergeben. Sie sind halt eh nur noch Gebrabbel für Idioten, die darauf herein fallen.

Der selbe Typ Idiot hätte auch damals die Entwicklung von Autos zugunsten von Kutschen verweigert, weil sicher jeden Moment die magische Super-Pferderasse gezüchtet wird, die Motoren obsolet machen.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Nee, "langfristig" ist selten das Problem, eher das Gegenteil. Langfristige Planungen erfordern Investitionen in den Aufbau von Produktionskapazitäten und das sieht in den Bilanzen kurzfristig nicht so toll aus, wie wenn man einfach Geld spart, durch Massenentlassungen oder gar keine Investitionen in die Zukunft.

Oder kurz: Das System ist einfach kaputt. Und es macht Firmen und die Wirtschaft kaputt, weil niemand mehr weiter als ein Quartal in die Zukunft schaut.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 7 hours ago

If only there was a difference between out-of-tree and kernel modules for Realtek's network stuff, but the driver quality and performance is most of the time abyssal anyway.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago

Why would the leading government party shy away from fascists when right-wing populism, culture war and cuddling up with fascists is all they do anyway.

Their active presence on basically any other platform would be a fucking clown show because there people would actually speak up against their bullshit constantly.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Terminal boomer brain...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 5 points 7 hours ago

The worst joke is that most of these parties have a fediverse presence, often even their own servers. The same is true for the EU btw...

But they just collectively decided to give a fuck (the EU even topped this by running fediverse stuff for years then ending the test phase with "it works well and easy... but none-the-less be can't be bothered to keep it up anyway).

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 7 hours ago

Sie werden ja auch immer noch von den selben Leuten dafür bezahlt...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 7 hours ago

Including US soldiers and their relatives living there, Vilseck has less than 7000 citizens.

So, sure... it would be highly impactful for a totally irrelevant vilage. Which is sad for a few people but entirely irrelevant nationally.

And I'm really sick of all the stories making it seem as anyone but some tiny villages and districts are interested in US military presence.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

With the EU not having formal common foreign policies the passports of member states are still separate, with numbers of countries that can be freely accessed with one ranging from 186 to 175 (Sweden to Cyprus).

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 7 points 8 hours ago

Was wir aus der Tatsache, dass die man einen ganze Artikel über die Niederlagen der AfD schreiben kann, von denen man aber sonst nie hört, bedauerlicherweise lernen können, ist dass unsere Medien in der breiten Masse aufgehört haben die Realität wiederzugeben.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 14 points 8 hours ago

Is there a whole card set?

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

There is NO justification for privately owned corporate AI.

Not that I actually like it, but I think privately owned corporate AI isn't the primary problem. It's the broken market that is the real problem creating some insane bubble that can (temporarily at best - but who cares for long-term effects nowadays) only be sustained by shoe-horning AI into 1001 applications that it can't fullfil properly.

Corporations competing with actual applications in fields where AI makes sense wouldn't be a problem, corporations competing for insane sums of financing by outpacing each other in terms of lies, fairy tales and trust-me-bro pseudo-science statements are. Because with insane amounts of money and nothing to actually show they instead spend a fraction of it on PR bullshit to advertise AI use in cases where it doesn't make sense, to get more money again. Rinse and repeat, with no actual value created.

26
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Ooops@feddit.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

# serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

Which works well.

And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

So long story short...

How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

view more: next ›

Ooops

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago