[–] 2 points 3 hours ago*

< [...]und damit Resonanz bekommt. Warum bekommt sie die

Du fragst das, als würde es an der Nachricht selbst liegen und nicht schlicht und ergreifend an Reichweite und Einfluss rechter Medien, die keinerlei Skrupel haben, Menschen zu belügen und Meinung zu machen, statt zu informieren.

Irgendwie endet die Fragestellung "was können wie dagegen tun" letztendlich immer in dem Märchen, dass die Parteien selber schuld sind und nur besser kommunizieren müssen. Denn daran, dass der deutsche Medienapparat kaputt ist, darf kann es ja nicht liegen. Rechte sind halt nur so toll im Kreischen und die unfähigen Grünen und Linken wissen nicht, wie man ordentlich kommuniziert. Selber Schuld, wenn die ihre Nachrichten nicht an den Mann bringen. ^/s^

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 4 hours ago* (1 child)

    not the more economically feasible equatorial orbit

    You somehow manage to make that sound like polar orbits are a minor thing and equatorial orbits are superior and harder to reach when it's the opposite. Equatorial in earth's rotational direction is the by far easiest one. That's the default because every other orbit is a lot harder in comparison.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago*

    ...or if you are living in Russia and your location too far north makes satellites in geo-synchronous orbit sub-optimal because their angle means a much longer distance signals have to travel through that pesky stuff we breath.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago* (1 child)

    as Europe enters satellite launch race

    Sure... Europe isn't launching satellites for decades.

    This isn't about satellite launching, Europe does this from Guiana Space Centre in Kourou for a very long time.

    This is about it being the first successfull orbital launch from a European location (so without all that nice free speed you get when going for an equatorial orbit and starting close to the equator eastwards) by a private start-up less than 8 years old. On their second try in total (people following such things might remember the huge amount of explosions Rapid Unscheduled Disassemblies starting rocket projects –privat or otherwise– tend to produce in the beginning).

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago*

    It's best near the equator (and starting eastwards) if you want an equatorial orbit because then you get all the rotational energy from earth for free.

    But if you want an polar orbit, so 90° to earth's rotation that passes over north and south pole, you are not just missing out on the free speed but the rotation perpendicular to the direction you are going actually is a problem you need to compensate for with more energy spend. But the further north (or south) to the pole you move for your start the less influence has the earth's rotation. The perfect scenario here would be a start exactly from the geographic north pole for no interference through earth's rotation.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 8 hours ago

    aber zumindest mal einen Moment nicht drauf kloppen kann man imo schon

    Das hab ich für den unwahrscheinlichen Fall reserviert, dass jemand es substantielles und positives passiert. CDU Gelaber ist halt CDU Gelaber, ohne jegliche Substanz und nur Beschäftigungstherapie für die hirntoten oder dementen Spinner, die die CDU nach wie vor jedesmal wählen. Und das nicht erst seit Merz. Der ist dabei nur ungeschickt und inkompetent genug, dass es endlich zumindest ein paar mehr Menschen merken.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 8 hours ago*

    Sure...because the artificial general intelligence is right around the corner and just another update away. And it will totally transform the world while making all those stupid plebs requiring wages (or even sick days, vacations, or health care - oh, the horror!) obsolete.

    Or at least that's the totally insane myth they are trying to sell because nothing less will ever justify the insane amount of money they pumped in that stupid bubble.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 14 hours ago

    Du missverstehst da etwas...

    Der Unternehmer möchte, dass es ihm gut geht. Und das nennt er dann Wirtschaft. Ob es dem Unternehmen gut geht (vorallem langfristig) ist eher zweitrangig, dass es dem gesamten Umfeld und den Arbeitern gut geht sogar kontraproduktiv.

    Genauso wie der Aktionär möchte, dass seine Geldanlagen wachsen. Also nennt er den Aktienindex Wirtschaft.

    Mit der Realität hat beides nicht viel zu tun.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 child)

    Isn't Kagi mostly just a meta search engine aggregating results from the usual suspects with some added independent index building?

    That's not exactly a rare feature, in fact most independent search engines do exactly that (querying the big searches while building their own index on top), and for free.

    Also you can self-host a metasearch engine (for example: see here) or use one of the several dozen ones other people self-host and make available to the public.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 15 hours ago* (2 children)

    Und wäre der Staat fein raus? Aber nicht doch, liebe Bundesregierung.

    Der Satz ist auch nur der traurige Versuch, davon abzulenken, dass das hier doch wieder nur um die eine millionste Nacherzählung des immer selben Märchens geht: Der einzelne kann so viel tun, er braucht nur die Motivation (und wenn es nicht klappt, wissen wir dann auch woran es lag *zwinker*). Du bist nicht allein. Fang doch einfach bei dir an. Klar, die Politik lässt dich völlig allein aber das wird sicher bald besser, wenn du erstmal anfängst.

    🤮

  • source
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›