[–] 7 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

Aber eben nicht in einer Demokratie, wenn die klare Mehrheit völlig verblödet ist und aktiv die Probleme wählt.

(Referenz: korrupte Regierungsparteien plus AfD und FDP, die jeweils das selbe, nur noch korrupter und/oder noch wahnhafter, vertreten: ~66% aller Stimmen... ~73% (obwohl die Rechnung natürlich etwas schief ist, weil die FDP gerade noch 0,3% unter der 5% Hürde steht) nach Sitzen... Das ist was Deutschland will!)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago

    Das ist aber eher absurd, bedenkt man, dass die Jüngeren größtenteils tatsächlich mit überhaupt nichts mehr umgehen können, was über Tippen und Ziehen von grellen Symbolen auf einem Touchscreen hinaus geht.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago

    Einfach klicken und lesen:

    Im Rahmen dieser Maßnahme wurde das Innenleben des A4-Turms auf das Niveau A7 angehoben. Kommandant, Richtschütze und Kraftfahrer erhielten neue Sichtsysteme mit digitalen Bedien- und Anzeigeelementen für ein verbessertes Situationsbewusstsein. Auch die Aufklärungs- und Nachtsichtfähigkeiten sowie die Feuerleitung wurden verbessert. Um die Richtgüte der Waffenanlage zu verbessern, wurden die Richtantriebe auf Elektromotoren umgestellt.
    [...]
    Die Modernisierungsmaßnahmen des Schützenpanzers beinhalten den Austausch des Heizgeräts des Panzers sowie der Sichtsysteme für den Kraftfahrer. Weitere Maßnahmen betreffen den Umbau des Staukastens am Heck des Panzers, so dass zukünftig mehr Ausrüstung mitgeführt werden kann.
    Zudem wurden Komponenten für den Turmantrieb getauscht und der Turm mit einer leistungsfähigeren Hauptzieleinrichtung ausgestattet. Weiterhin wurden alle Schützenpanzer mit Aufnahmepunkten für Verwundetentragen ausgestattet und können so je nach Bedarf eingesetzt werden, um Verwundete aus dem Gefahrenbereich zu transportieren.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 10 points 7 hours ago* (3 children)

    Welche Konsequenzen würdest du denn erwarten, wenn eine korrupte CDU-Politikerin brav die CDU-Linie gegen das Land aber für die überreichen Spender, denen sie tatsächlich dienen, umsetzt?

    Nach dem Job geht's wieder zurück auf 'nen Führungsposten in der Fossilwirtschaft, während die CDU so tun kann, als hätte sie das Problem verstanden und deshalb personelle Konsequenzen gezogen. Und in 1-2 Legislaturperioden, wenn das nächste Stück deutschen Fortschritts vernichtet werden muss, bekommt sie wieder 'ne entsprechende Rolle in der Regierung. Hat bei der Solarindustrie perfekt funktioniert, bei der Windindustrie immerhin ausreichend; jetzt macht sie Speicher kaputt, untergräbt die Anstrengungen privater Haushalte (die ja lächerlicherweise derzeit einen großen Teil des Solarausbaus und den Hauptteil beim Anschluss von Batteriespeichern tragen) und schreibt die deutsche Gasabhängigkeit auf Jahrzehnte fest. Mal schauen, was als nächstes kommt.

    Tatsächlich dürfen wir uns ja auch nicht darüber aufregen. Die deutliche Mehrheit der Deutschen würde selbst Stand:heute entweder "Ja, weiter mit dem Wahnsinn von Rückschritt und Verfall" oder "das Selbe, aber in noch radikaler mit noch mehr populistischem Irrsinn" wählen. Wir bekommen halt genau das, was der wahnhaft dumme Bürger mehrheitlich will.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago*

    Do right-wing morons ever do something else than projecting their cultish mindset when talking about how the left is pushing ideology, virtual signaling (whatever the flavor of the month is...) and brigading?

    (I would give him bonus points however for managing to cram the top3 of "tHe LeFt"-brain rot into a single statement. That's actual dedication... or better training.)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

    maybe people with similar political views tend to agree on certain topics

    For people those people treating politics as a team sport and uncondtionally cheering for everything their team does, all while not actually having any independent views and opinions beyond the latest narratives their favorite talking heads are spreading that day, this must feel like a completely alien concept.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 19 points 1 day ago

    Did they go the normal Munich way of promising to build their regional headquarter in the city in exchange for the idiotic decision to allow their operation?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago*

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing

    That's the probably most unhelpful and stupid thing I saw in quite some time. The AI or Not Quiz right at the beginning in particular regularly links the exact same things to human or to AI (404 links are a sign or AI hallucination or just natural link decay that show it's from a human; wonky grammar is a sign for AI unless the text is human-written where it's just bad english that LLMs would not produce intentionally...).

    Yes, spotting AI by clear attributes isn't easy. If it was those points would be changed first in training of AI. But lengthily discussing tell–tale signs then interpreting them in contrary ways depending on source is absolute bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Keine Angst, wir reden hier schließlich auch vom Ministerium für Energie. Die werden im Notfall schon Wege findet, dass du deinen Verrat an der deutschen Verbrennungsverehrung durch deine Stromkosten zahlst.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child)

    No, you said these videos show common mistakes on purpose because real users would make them. Which is okay...

    But it doesn't matter if it was an honest mistake or one made on purpose because it's a common thing.

    Ignoring the chat telling him the problem (and that he caused it himself) and also not mentioning the problem's origin anymore later was not an accident. Given the fact that he later made some offhand comment about "yeah, shader thing again" he understood the problem yet intentionally chose to not include the explanation in the video but leave it at "on Linux there are random freezes I don't understand".

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    When you look around your room do you not see a plethora of goods made by polluting industries?

    No, but yeah some trees died for furniture. 🙄

    Do you travel exclusively by foot?

    No, also by bike and public transport. Which partly is still running on fossil fuels (although still vastly more efficient per person) because brain rot (or money) tells people in the relevant positions that greener alternatives don't work or are inefficient.
    Even for people actually dependent on cars it's not real facts that keeps them chained to rediculously oversized cars running on inefficient combustion engines. That exclusively based on propaganda, paid by the people that want to keep selling fossil fuels.

    Do you eat only foods that can be brought to your area without refrigerated trucks?

    Mostly actual... but that isn't even the point. I talked specifically about the big chunk of pollution that is burning fossil fuels. Are you trying to tell me that you can't transport those electric (on the last mile), by (also electrified) train and that you can't run the refrigerators on green electricity somehow?

    None of us are willing to give up the computers or network infrastructure

    Which was very much not my point. What I was talking about is people's unwillingness to use greener and also more efficient alternatives for a lot of things. Not based on facts. Not based on the unwillingless to go without them completely. But 100% based on loud, constant, paid screaming that those alternatives don't work and are more expensive and really, really don't solve any real problems other that stopping the massive burning of fossils (but shhh... don't talk about that small detail).

    I really don't understand your focus on computers and networks that actually have a lot of pros, too, when people not willing to give up their city-tanks or three dozen throw away plastic bags a week (although there are alternatives in no way worse) and often also voting for idiots clinging to fossil fuel power plants and car infrastructure above anything else are also a big problem. Ones we could actually easily solve yet don't because paid narratives are running the show.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›