[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

As I'm still waiting to see those targeted ads I assumed people are idiots and blasting out their identity and interests all over the place...

PS: Also I was talking about actual finger printing. On the physical bills. To trace them through all the hands between me getting them from a bank and some bank getting them back. The finger printing involved in targeting a ads online is a completely different thing... and easier to avoid, too, as it can be done with a one time setup where IRL I would constantly need to remember to put on gloves.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago

I'm using the default calendar app that a long time ago came with that lineageos install.

Should be this one iirc...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago

Sure, but in the end there are more hours of sun in summer to more than compensate for non-optimal temperatures.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago

as one doesn’t deposit or withdraw a single bill at a time, a large pile of data is created

That would actually create a much bigger data base

Anonymity is an illusion [...] Don’t give them reason to suspect anything

"Trust me, bro, they totally control everything. So just be a good little drone and don't dare to have actual thoughts." Sure... 🤣

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Which get this information from all banks through constant finger-print analysis run on every bill returning to them? 😂

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Don't host the calendar, just host some WebDAV/CalDAV. That format is supported by basically all apps on every platform (usually including the default app on most phones), so everyone can pick what they want (or just stick with what they already use).

My personal pick for that purpose is Radicale.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

Since when government doesn’t have access to your purchases?

How does the government know where I spend the amount of cash I withdrew from my account?

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 86 points 1 day ago

A mandatory [AI] tag? Sure.

A [NOT AI] tag? No, that's the default. Why normalise AI bullshit even further?

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

"Das Designen, Anpassen, Besitzen oder Verbreiten von KI-Systemen, die speziell für die Generierung von Missbrauchsmaterial oder Deepfakes entwickelt wurden, wird künftig mit bis zu zwei Jahren Haft bestraft."

Tja, dann braucht xAI wohl ein neues Geschäftsmodell...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 34 points 1 day ago

If there only was a source of cheap electricity on hot, sunny days...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nö, hat sie nicht. Zum einen, weil alle ihre sonstigen Maßnahmen darauf zielen, Erneuerbare auszubremsen, zum anderen, weil die gesetzliche Planung eine Wahnvorstellung ist:

Ab dem Jahr X sind so und so viel Prozent klimaneutrales Gas/Öl verpflichtend, wenn man weiß, dass diese Mengen nicht existieren werden, ist halt kein Gesetz, sondern Bürgerveraschung.

Das ist die exakt selbe Story wie das eFuel-Märchen. "Ihr müsst jetzt nichts ändern, sondern in der Zukunft wird die Technologie das für euch erledigen!" gefolgt von einem zukünftigen "Tja, wer hätte nur absehen könnnen, dass die verlangte Änderung jetzt gar nicht machbar ist. Dann müssen wir die ursprünglichen Ziele wohl einfach streichen. War halt nicht möglich. Schade aber auch..."

Das ist das Äquivalent von "Du must an der roten Ampel des Fußgängerübergangs nicht bremsen. Bis zu den Fußgänger eirreichst gibt es sicher längst Technik, die ihn zuverlässig vor dem Aufprall schützt.", "Oh, jetzt ist er tot? Wäre das doch bloß absehbar gewesen..."

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

(heavy?)

And right there lies your misconception. Newer software is not heavier by definition. Quite the contrary it often gets more efficient because of constant optimisation and improvements.

The concept of newer software using up ressouces like crazy is the scam used by corporate OS' so you buy new hardware constantly.

34
submitted 2 weeks ago by Ooops@feddit.org to c/unixporn@lemmy.world

26
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Ooops@feddit.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

# serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

Which works well.

And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

So long story short...

How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

view more: next ›

Ooops

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago