overview for Ooops

Nordic states urge EU to block Russian tourists, as visa approvals surge for second year in a row by Ooops in c/europe@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Because every € paid by tourists in the EU is a loss for Russia, everyone coming to live in the EU instead is a loss of workpower (and brain) for Russia.

Russia will not win the war in Ukraine based on spying out movements in the EU. Ukraine will not win this war because of military superiority.

There's exactly one reason why Russia will lose and it's purely economic. Seriously... Putin would love to close the borders and let no one out anymore if that wouldn't bring a whole new set of problems. Why help him?

should i switch to linux? by Ooops in c/linux@lemmy.ml

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

You could click the link already provided above. Just the Table of Contents at the top gives you a good overview about issues with Brave without reading anything else...

Federation Has a European Legal Problem by Ooops in c/europe@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 9 hours ago

It's not only speculation, the whole argument is based on implications that this court ruling might in some cases contradict other court rulings and established law.

"... the ruling suggests much stronger responsibilities for social networking platforms, and the proactive monitoring and filtering of uploads is a difficult responsibility for most of the services that operate on the open procotols."

So this means basically nothing for now until the legal aspect is sorted out and laws explicitly defining the responsibilities of social media platforms are harmonised with this ruling (or not...).

New Yorkers to World Cup Fans: Please Don’t Walk to MetLife Stadium by Ooops in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Or -just a totally unhinged idea- don't increase the prices for transportion by +900% to exploit World Cup visitors...

A new bike lane in Scotland has divided public opinion. Drivers want it removed. During the filming of the BBC news piece, a man threatened to kill a female cyclist on camera by Ooops in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 37 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Always impressive how they manage to let idiots parrot every long disproven "argument" completely unquestioned. Peak journalism as usual. As if there weren't enough studies showing that removing parking spots for pedestrian and cycling infrastructure actuall increases walk-in customers and revenue for all shops nearby.

Windkraftausbau im Süden – lohnt sich das überhaupt? by Ooops in c/energie@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Das ist meines Wissens nach aber eine unnötige vereinfachte Darstellung. Statt "lohnt sich der Bau auch bei weniger Wind und damit Energieerzeugung?" müsste es eigentlich heißen "Lohnt sich der Bau von etwas höheren (und damit etwas teureren) Windrädern, um ordentliche Ausbeute zu erreichen?".

Die grundsätzliche Antwort bleibt die selbe, aber ohne es direkt gegen Transportkosten und Subventionen (und ob diese von Dauer sind) gegenrechnen zu müssen. Warum den Gegnern noch Argumente über Standortegüte von nur 50% an die Hand geben, wenn "es kosten in dem Gebiet ein schlicht paar % mehr, um gute Verhältnisse zu haben" auch funktioniert, weil es nur ein paar Meter höher völlig anders aussieht (so ist das halt im Gebirge...)?

Stromfresser sollen uns souverän machen by Ooops in c/europa@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Neue Rechenzentren sollen massig Energie verschlingen.

Das ist aber mitnichten das Problem.

Das falsche Propagandanarrarativ, dass Energieproduktion nur gelingen kann, wenn wir dafür den Planet abfackeln, samt der üblichen rechten "Umweltauflagen und Nachhaltigkeit gefährden die Wirtschaft"-Märchen sind das tatsächliche Problem.

Ist der Energiebedarf gerechtfertigt? Brauchen wir die Rechenzentren wirklich? Ergibt es Sinn Umweltvorschriften in Frage zu stellen?

Das wären die Fragen, die tatsächlicher Journalismus stellen sollte.

Aber da der schon lange tot ist, kriegen wir stattdessen solche Scheißtitel, die falsche Narrative ("Umweltschutz steht Energieverbrauch und letztendlich auch Industrie entgegen!") unhinterfragt übernehmen. Und da wundert man sich dann (nein, tut man eigentlich nicht, dass ist genauso beabsichtigt...), dass Leute Umweltschutz in Frage stellen oder gegen andere Faktoren abwägen, die in der Realität vereinbar wären.

AfD Dominated TikTok in the German Election by Ooops in c/europe@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

...with "regular users" being an euphemism for bots and trolls.

25

the boring one running on my ancient toaster for many years [i3, transparent xfce-panel over conky as bottom bar] (thelemmy.club)

submitted 15 hours ago by Ooops@feddit.org to c/unixporn@lemmy.world

1 comments fedilink

Bundesregierung erteilt mehr Transparenz eine Absage by Ooops in c/deutschland@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 20 points 16 hours ago

Korruption und Transparenz sind halt nicht kompatibel...

bye bye processes, you go sleep ***now*** :))) by Ooops in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago

irrelevant metaphysical distinction...

bye bye processes, you go sleep ***now*** :))) by Ooops in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 8 points 17 hours ago

The point here is that SystemD's natural behavior is to send SIGTERM then wait an eternity.

Those "service XY is shutting down (5sec/2min)" messages you sometimes get on shutdown are coming from SystemD not waiting for 3 seconds like the meme suggests, but waiting for minutes before giving up and switching over to SIGKILL instead.

Die unfassbare Macht der Alkohollobby - Simplicissimus by Ooops in c/dach@feddit.org

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Gibt es auch die deutsche Edition "Die unfassbare Macht jeglicher Industrie- und Wirtschaftslobby"?

26

Need some ELI5 on proxy_pass in Nginx, in particular regarding having Anubis in the chain (feddit.org)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Ooops@feddit.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

11 comments fedilink

As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

# serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

Which works well.

And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

So long story short...

How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?