[–] 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Was noch dazu kommt, ist dass Dinge wie der enorme Wassderverbrauch nicht mal nötig wären. Technisch wäre das auch anders möglich, aber es ist nur Teil dummer Sparmaßnahmen, die nötig sind, um die Gewinne eines Modells zu optimieren, die in Wahrheit gar nicht existieren, weil das ganze Modell Irrsinn ist und zu realistischen Kosten (gerade ist das ja noch massives Dumping im Kampf um Marktanteile) überhaupt nicht funktioniert.

Also eigentlich ist nicht KI selber existenzbedrohend, sondern –wiedereinmal– nur die unglaubliche Gier einiger weniger, die wahnhaft alles mit KI lösen wollen, weil KI zu verkaufen eben ihr Geschäftsmodell ist.

PS:

Ihr Energieverbrauch ist so enorm, dass weltweit Dutzende neue fossile Kraftwerke geplant sind

"Dutzende weltweit" wirkt hier etwas fehl am Platze. Das wäre tatsächlich eher irrelevant.

Um mal die Relationen herzustellen: So ein modernes Gaskraftwerk liegt deutlich unter 1GW Kapazität. Und allein 2025 wurden weitweit etwa 700GW an Stromproduktion zugebaut (davon übrigens 85% Solar-/Wasser-/Windkraft).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 2 hours ago*

    why is it worthy of a Politico article?

    Politico is owned by the far-right and MAGA-supporting pile of shit that is Axel Springer SE, who also just a few days ago gave an award to Peter Thiel for his "entrepreneurial spirit, innovative energy, and societal impact".

    Does that answer your question why they publish this crap to push their antidemocratic pro-US and Big Tech agenda?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 2 hours ago

    Glücklicherweise hat die C*U längst klargestellt, dass sie eh mit Nazis kuscheln möchte, egal unter welchem Vorwand. Also kommt auch niemand auf die Idee das noch ernst zu nehmen, wenn diese Scheiße als Reaktion auf Links verkauft werden soll.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    That's not even purely arch-specific, but I know a low of people where rolling release solved the issue of distro hopping which was often triggered by one of those full upgrades that barely ever worked without issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 3 hours ago

    Cool, lasst uns mal wieder das Konzept und die Nutzung externer Platformen diskutieren, um nicht über die unterirdische Qualität reden zu müssen, die da für unsere Gebühren verbrochen wird, völlig unabhängig davon, wie und wo es vertrieben wird...

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 21 hours ago

    Das wir Trump und die Republikaner bei den Midterms unterstützen (müssen) ist ja schon sehr bitter.

    Wir müssen nicht, wir wollen. Denn wenn wir nicht genug mit dem MAGA-Fascho-Pack kuscheln, helfen die auch nicht, weiter unseren heimischen idioten die Hirne zu bleichen und auch hier den heilsbringenden Faschismus einzuführen.


    gezeichnet, die designierten Juniorpartner der baldigen brauen Regierung

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago*

    Or how similar it is to every pro austerity politician ever.

    Oh, I forgot one of the highlights as it happened right in the beginning of Merz' tenure. They loudly campaigned on no new debts of course while everyone else agreed that some will be needed (after decades of investment backlog caused by his party). Then they took on an historic amount of debt for investments into defense, the economy and infrastructure the moment they won the elctions... and wasted it all on tax cuts and similiar bullshit while actually investing even less in the crumbling infrastructure than their cash-strapped predecessors did.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Bragging rights are for memes. The actual appeal is a system that just runs (and runs and runs without needing reinstalls or complete upgrade overhauls, thx rolling release), and that you can actually modify (or repair) because it's close to upstream and does not stack one set of configurations on top of the build-in configs and another GUI tool (or two) again managing its own settings on top. All to isolate users from that somehow scary terminal...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›