[–] 2 points 6 hours ago

I still don't understand where people are findign these useful AI answers. Every single time I try it seems AI is an acronym for artificial idiocy and I wouldn't even trust it to tell me the time.

(In fact I just resently tried asking that stupid meta AI in sand-boxed Whatsapp (I still have to keep because of some stubborn examples of humanity) about the time in another time zone... It could tell my local time, in which time zone I was, what timezone I was asking about and what the difference between those zones was. Yet it could somehow not answer the question directly before being led there step by step. And then it still did the math wrong... 🤬)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago*

    I have made the completely opposite experience. I tried so many distros and every single time some non-trivial issues came up my search ended in the arch wiki finally explaining stuff and writing out available options in config files instead of just telling my what option in what GUI config tool (that might or might not exist in my distro) I should click, then pray it works (felt very alike to windows actually where you get two dozen guides to solve a problem, each one editing another obscure registry key and trying to find the one actually working with the current version).

    So I wasted years listening to the "No, Archlinux is a meme and totally unusable for inexperienced people" before installing archlinux, which is now running for more than 9 years without problems, and will happily point people asking questions for other distros to the relevant parts of the arch wiki that actually spell stuff out properly.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 6 hours ago*

    Das gab es bei uns (genau wie bei euch) schon seit Ewigkeiten. Aber der rechte Schmutz muss halt erst durch ständige Normalisierung und Diskursverschiebung mutig genug werden, sich offen auch zum allerletzten altertümlichen Schwachsinn als angebliches Zeichen ihrer guten Sitten zu bekennen.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 6 hours ago*

    Shush! They are not supposed to know that the AI–Anti-Ai fight is fabricated bullshit with both sides being equally stupid (like people arguing based on ideological zeal always are...). And that it's just a show so that the majority is occupied with watching the mud fight so they don't think about the actual problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 6 hours ago

    You are conflating environmental costs of AI with willful destruction to make money.

    AI data centers don't need to use giant amounts of water. They do because assholes can get away with saying "fuck the people and environment" by paying off other assholes in governing positions to not regulate them.

    AI data center's electricity usage is not a problem either. We will see a massive increase in demand anyway as electrification is actually a big step in decarbonisation. What is a problem are again assholes in the fossil fuel industry that lobby the already mentioned corrupt assholes in government to fight renewable energy and its infrastructure that is clean and available in abundance.

    If you believe that AI is a cause for the problem and not just a pretense and that they would not have found (actually manufacture, just like they manufactured this insane "Ai will solve everything"-bubble) another reason (or dozens) to burn the planet for their profit anyway, you really lost the plot.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -1 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    you did read it, right?

    Why would people read it? There is giant mud fight happening between idiots believing AI is the devil and idiots believing AI is their new lord and savior. And like most morons only interested in that kind of team sport they already picked their side to cheer for. No actual arguments or thinking required.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 7 hours ago

    Or maybe, just maybe people eating up a constant stream of propaganda produced by those whose whole financial future is tied to AI being the universal solution to every problem (and some they have to create in the first place) are indeed a problem.

    Just because 24/7 advertising tells you to hammer in screws doesn't mean it's the smart thing to do. And neither does it show how useless a hammer is as a tool.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 7 hours ago*

    AI is a tool and the problem world wide is that nearly everyone is using the tool wrong

    Because the public discussion devolved into some insane fight between people ideologically against any AI (funnily often the argument "it's stealing other people's work" is coming from people that are fundamentally against copyrights in every other case) and some not less crazy people believing that AI is their new lord and savior (and a lot of them are paid or the followers to said paid influencers you just changed one idol (tech billionaires) to another one as instructed...).

    It's basically a mud fight between those believing that hammers are inherently evil and need to be destroyed and those that think everything in this world is a nail. Nothing in-between.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 8 hours ago

    Danke, aber das ist nicht nötig. Der Ton, den du bemängelst, war ein bewusster Versuch, nachdem du mehrfach absolut alles, was ich vorhergeschrieben habe, ignoriert hast, um immer wieder wie wahnhaft "aBeR AnTiSeMiTiSmUs!1!" zu wiederholen.

    Dass dieser Versuch jetzt scheinbar als persönlicher Angriff und respektlos aufgefasst wird, bestätigt nur, was ich bereits geschrieben habe. Dir kann offenbar nicht mehr geholfen werden. Manche Menschen müssen zurückgelassen werden, was ich hiermit tue...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 12 hours ago* (2 children)

    Der Markt regelt immer nur, wenn es den Lobbyisten genehm ist. Hier wird dann mit ein wenige Geld dafür gesorgt, dass korrupte Politiker viel von unseren Steuergeldern in die Hand nehmen, um zu verhindern, dass der Markt regelt. Mach dich z.B. schon mal auf 'ne regelmäßig ausgebaut Spritpreisbremse aus Dauereinrichtung gefasst.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›