[–] 0 points 1 hour ago* (2 children)

An old salt mine

Been there, done that. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asse_II_mine)

dump it in the ocean

Sure... (https://www.earth.com/environment/scientists-found-200000-barrels-of-leaking-radioactive-waste/)

literally anywhere in its sarcophagus

Good idea! (https://en.as.com/latest_news/in-1977-the-us-buried-120000-tons-of-radioactive-waste-in-a-pacific-nuclear-tomb-almost-50-years-later-the-ocean-is-threatening-to-expose-the-runit-dome-f202608-n-2/)

Any more ideas that are proven to not work without risk of contaminating the environment with uncalculable consequences?

The amount of waste from nuclear power is miniscule

The miniscule amount of 200,000 tons was already dumped into the ocean (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_disposal_of_radioactive_waste#History) leaking radioactivity there.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago*

    Ich bin mir zeimlich sicher, dass es nicht an den Geräten liegt. Selbst das älteste von ihnen ('nen altes Samsung S7) ist kompatibel, korrekt konfiguriert, und hat tatsächlich schon Cell Broadcast Nachrichten empfangen. Nur eben nie an den Warntagen bei mir zu Hause, weil es bei dem System scheinbar ein extremes Chaos, sowohl nach Anbietern als auch lokal gibt.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago

    Street safety and bike lanes are not a culture war.

    Everything is a front of the culture war when culture war to divert from your actual bullshit is the goal...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 child)

    Yes, but it can be stored where batteries lose power over time. And a lot of the infrastructure doesn't need to be build but can be converted from natural gas use.

    In the end batteries and hydrogen fill two very different gaps. You can use batteries to shift the renewable production peak at noon (thanks solar) to the demand peak in the evening, maybe even flatten fluctuation (in production and demand) over a few days. But they are entirely useless as seasonal long-term storage.

    Also plans to produce green hydrogen exist independently. It's a requirement to decarbonise a lot of industry processes where direct use of electricity doesn't work. It's also a raw material in chemical industry.

    So if decarbonisation of more than just electricity production is the goal, large scale hydrogen production is a given. As is large scale storage as production from renewable energy will always have seasonal fluctuations. From there having it also double as long-term on-demand stored energy means just scaling up what is already there.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Most analyses show the cheapest way to fully decarbonize will include some baseline sources like nuclear.

    Show me a single serious one pls...

    The whole concept of baseline production is obsolete. I was the idea of having a steady, cheap base load producer (mostly coal) with a quickly reacting, more expensive peaker (oil or gas) to cover the actual demand.

    But coal isn't cheap anymore, neither do we actually want to burn more of it even if it was. And nuclear can't fullfill either role. It's useless as traditional base load in the actual sense of the concept as it's not cheap. It's useless as a peaker.

    And renewables plus batteries (both having seen exponentially drops in costs for years now) can actually already cover that base load concept. Get enough capacity to shift the production peak at noon to the demand peak in early evening and you are set (that is in fact what California is already doing).

    The actual route to full decarbonisation is that renewables+short-term storage and some long-term storage. And a big part of that long-term storage is power-to-gas (from excess renewable production at peaks) and gas-peakers.

    Nuclear can play a role in reducing some of the demand for short-term storage (flattening the curve by always producing at some level) and make electrolysis more economical (not only running with renewable excess power in the day but also at night when demand drops and nuclear still produces). But this is mostly from a perspective of already having nuclear, wanting nuclear for geopolitical reasons and then finding a niche were is can work in the renewable/storage system.

    (For reference: RTE, the French grid provider –they have the higher share of nuclear after all–, did a big study about the future of nuclear up to 2050in 2021), modeling a lot of scenarios... Long story short: Renewables, batteries and power-to-gas with peakers is the way to go. Nuclear can work in this setup (at about 35%, 65% renewables) when that's politically demanded.)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago (6 children)

    Das würde ich auch mal gern erleben. Also irgendeine Form der Warnung. Cellbroadcast auf 4/4 Geräten: Stille. Sirenen, die ich sogar fast sehen kann, da steht nur ein Haus zwischen: Nichts.

    So langsam sehe ich den Sinn der regelmäßigen Warntage nicht, wenn sich einfach nie was ändert und es einfach keine Warnungen gibt.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago

    Der rechte öffentliche Sender Ongehoord Nederland sieht sich als die Stimme der Ausgeschlossenen.

    Passt doch. Nazis und anderer rechtsextremer Abschaum gehören aus der zivilisierten Gesellschaft ausgeschlossen, also Mission accomplished...

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago (1 child)

    but I think it’s not too far away.

    It could be not far away. That's the reason we see such a big uptick in funding and publicity for basically every right-wing moron on the planet fighting against (among other stuff) renewables.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago* (5 children)

    If you think it's about the restrictive regulation being a result of lobbying and not the state taking over all the risk, you can try to find anyone willing to insure your private reactor (yes, very low chance of an accident but immensely constly) or make a business plan how you guarantee the save storage of waste for a few millenia.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›