[–] 3 points 5 hours ago

"Jeder Mensch soll sich auf der Straße sicher vor Straftätern fühlen können und deshalb das Recht haben, sie jederzeit straffrei totzuprügeln." klingt auch vernünftig... wenn man nur den ersten Teil der Aussage laut ausspricht und offen lässt, wo die Grenze gezogen wird, mit welchen gut sichtbaren Abzeichen diese markiert werden, und wer die Entscheidung trifft.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Bei den deutschen Autos liest du von so'nem Rückruf groß, bei den chinesichen vom letzten Dutzend Rückrufe eher nicht. Da hatten wir in den letzten Wochen –wenn ich mir recht erinnere~ erst 3: Bremspedale mit Fertigungsfehler, nicht funktionierend Not-Entriegelungen und Lenkprobleme bis um Komplettausfall.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 6 hours ago* (1 child)

    "In this world of trenches and tank traps"

    "In this world of mines"

    "In this would of RPGs"

    "In this world of ATGMs"

    ...

    We have heard the same song again and again. Tanks will not become obsolete because counter-measures are developed. They will just adapt to new threats unless there is an actual replacement that can fullfil their role on the battle field. Which drones don't.

    Alas... the next iteration is coming with more active defenses as well as a remote-weapon station able to work against drones. And with their own set of missiles and/or loitering munitions.

    Also, quite contrary to the "tanks are dead" narrative, the less talked about class of IFVs is actually getting much more tank-like with similiar levels of armor and active defense as tanks, just another specialisation

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago (3 children)

    If they don’t use reddit how do they know is a repost?

    Why would they care? If it's useful stuff getting posted that's okay. If it's just a spammer flooding everything with low quality stuff treat them accordingly. The fact that the same posts exist on reddit is entirely irrelevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago (2 children)

    Es gibt sicher hundert Möglichkeiten, was als nächstes getan werden soll.

    Schön wie du ignorierst, dass eben –wie in den von mir genannten Beispielen offenscihtlich– "als nächstes" exakt gar nichts getan wird.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 19 hours ago*

    Wasting his administration’s own resources just as much as everyone else involved is

    Using ressources for what you want to do (demolishing democracy in this case) is no waste.

    It's not like this administration is using any ressources on anything else anyway... well, maybe with the exception of enriching themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 20 hours ago

    Ich hoffe kein vernünftiger Bürgy würde dieser Anforderung, ein Stolperstein ausbuddeln und dann das Loch wieder verschließen, nachkommen

    Dann nehmen sie einfach einen der anderen. Die sind inzwischen eh in der Überzahl.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 20 hours ago

    Wen erreiche ich damit denn sonst noch? Die Leute, deren "Meinungsbildung" das nachplappern rechter Narrative sind? Wohl eher nicht! Oder geht doch eher ums symbolische Einrennen offener Türen, damit man das Gefühl hat, etwas zu tun (und auch noch voll erfolgreich ohne viel Widerspruch – die, die widersprechen würden, bleiben schließlich zu Hause und gucken sich lieber weiter Propaganda an).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›