sorted by: new top controversial old
Prime islamic state propaganda in c/noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
[–] 4 points 7 hours ago

Defining "Not calling out the obvious perpetrator" as "neutral"... 😆

Guess we should be impressed you didn't call it the "Iran War on the US", totally not to confound someone but because neutral means in alphabetical order...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • German ministry mulls ramping up coal-fired plants to cut energy costs in c/europe@feddit.org
    [–] 6 points 7 hours ago* (7 children)

    Do you know anyone that works in the energy sector

    Yes.

    like anyone that is an expert in maintaining the power grid and electricity

    Yes

    You do not

    Oh, so that wasn't a question and you just wanted to speak some more about the symptoms of your brain rot. Well...

    you don’t actually know how much things cost, especially in the winter!

    Yeah, sure. Reality is lying, facts aren't real, economic figures are wrong... and the expensive energy sources are actually the cheap ones and one of the few countries actually highly autonomous with reserve capicities held back to supply themselves and several neighbours at the same time is suffering from an energy crisis.

    Where have I heard that one before? Oh, yes... in the right-wing propaganda media that spend the last few years hallucinating about blackouts any moment now™. The same morons telling funny tales about Germany's total on French nuclear power when in reality less than 4% of the total power was imported, the vast majority in renewables from nordic countries. The same morons that ranted against heat pumps for years (because "who doesn't even understand how that magic is supposed to work" - paraphrasing but not really far from their actual coverage). The same morons that now loudly scream about EVs and how we really, really need to stick to combustion engines if we want to save the car industry (and civilisation!!)...

    Guess I know where you get the shit you mistake for information.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Ich🦓iel in c/ich_iel@feddit.org
    Ergebnisse der U18-Landtagswahl in Sachsen-Anhalt in c/dach@feddit.org
    German ministry mulls ramping up coal-fired plants to cut energy costs in c/europe@feddit.org
    [–] 7 points 10 hours ago (11 children)

    Of course it does. You have already demonstrated your propaganda-induced brain-damage when you argued that cutting nuclear, the most expensive way to produce electricity, somehow increased energy costs.

    So it's not at all surprising that a "We reject (and block and sabotage) cheap renewable energy and storgae to focus on expensive fossil fuels to [somehow, magically...] reduce costs"-statement of a corrupt government paid by fossil fuel lobbyists makes sense for you.

    The actual reality is the opposite: They are trying to establish the narrative of an energy crisis so they can justify using more fossil fuels. All to increase the profits of fossil fuel companies paying them. Then, when the costs go up even more, they will tell you that those evil renewables are to blame and we just need to burn more of the expensive coal and gas. And as you obviously lost contact to reality already, you will believe them and happily keep fighting against cheap green energy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Strompreis: Bundeswirtschaftsministerium will Kohlekraftwerke stärker nutzen in c/deutschland@feddit.org
    Ergebnisse der U18-Landtagswahl in Sachsen-Anhalt in c/dach@feddit.org
    German ministry mulls ramping up coal-fired plants to cut energy costs in c/europe@feddit.org
    German state leader floats longer working hours to save VW plant in c/europe@feddit.org
    [–] 4 points 10 hours ago

    To be fair here, being on vacation also doesn't stop them from screaming how we totally need to focus on combustion engines to save a car industry struggling because they wouldn't transition away from obsolete CEs in time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Ich🦓iel in c/ich_iel@feddit.org
    Brandmauer-Debatte vor Wahl in Sachsen-Anhalt: CDU-Prominenz droht mit Parteiaustritt in c/dach@feddit.org
    [–] 16 points 10 hours ago* (3 children)

    Wäre schön, wenn das wirklich passiert, aber leider neige ich eher dazu, den Drohungen von CDU-Mitgliedern soviel wert beizumessen, wie den Wahlversprechen..

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    They got wildberries at my lidl in c/noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
    25
    Need some ELI5 on proxy_pass in Nginx, in particular regarding having Anubis in the chain (feddit.org)
    submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
    11 comments fedilink
     

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›