sorted by: new top controversial old
How in the hell are these legal? in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
[–] 8 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

nothing can stick out beyond the body of the car (expect mirrors), not even wheels.

That might be true for civilised countries.

But then it's also the main reason why cars brought over by US military staff fail the inspection for road worthiness here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Statistik: Einwanderer in vielen Berufen längst unverzichtbar in c/dach@feddit.org
    Stinkwanzen: Warum belagern sie unsere Wohnungen? in c/dach@feddit.org
    [–] 7 points 10 hours ago

    Da mir bisher nie eine der ins Haus geflüchteten Wanzen verraten hat, ob sie 'ne Stinkwanze ist, während ich sie einfach wieder raus auf den Balkon gebracht habe, erschließt sich mir das Problem nicht.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    Spahn verzichtet offenbar auf Sitz im Haushaltsausschuss in c/dach@feddit.org
    [–] 12 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    Das Schlagwort, dass er in guter Populistenmanier eigentlich auspacken wollte, war "polarisiert". Aber dann ist ihm augefallen, dass es dafür ja irgendwen geben müsste, der ihn positiv sieht.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Final thoughts on my Linux daily driving choice in c/linux@lemmy.ml
    [–] 46 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

    I personally have gone for Manjaro

    Why would anyone intentionally do that?

    The whole Manjaro concept of delaying Arch updates by two weeks is bullshit, because they don't actually use that time for additional tests or include fixes. They just ship exactly the same bugs 2 weeks later.

    On top of this where Arch explicitly warns users about the AUR as unvetted community content and only lets you install AUR helpers manually (increasing the chance that people see the warning and think twice) Manjaro comes with their own AUR helper pre-installed. No warning, no nothing. Oh, and they use the unmodified AUR which is running under the assumption that you have an updated Arch system, not one weeks out-of-date. So welcome to breakages and dependency hell.

    Said Manjaro-specific AUR helper also has ddos'ed the AUR on multiple occasions because they don't seem to believe in testing.

    Have I mentioned the –by now meme-worthy– fact that they are too stupid to not let their SSL certificates expire and unironically proposed setting your PC's clock/date back as a solution?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    Kolumne: Das Altpapier am 22. September 2026 – "Die Faschisten vor hundert Jahren hatten stärkere Gegner als die heutigen" in c/dach@feddit.org
    Failure to Understand the Assignment in c/noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
    German town bans stumbling stone memorials to Nazi victims in c/news@lemmy.world
    [–] 26 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I actually disagree.

    They were warned again and again yet still voted for this shit. And now that it finally bites them in the ass their only reaction is to run screaming to the only party even more to the right, more openly corrupt and more obviously lying.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Kolumne: Das Altpapier am 22. September 2026 – "Die Faschisten vor hundert Jahren hatten stärkere Gegner als die heutigen" in c/dach@feddit.org
    [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Andere Sichtweise: Die sind nicht mit der (externen) rechten Bubble “vernetzt”, sie sind ein integraler Bestandteil der rechten Macht.

    Da drück ich mich einmal im Leben diplomatisch aus (im Sinne der Idioten, denen der politische Zusammenhang tatsächlich egal ist, weil sie eh nur noch in Klicks denken)... 😅

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • German town bans stumbling stone memorials to Nazi victims in c/news@lemmy.world
    [–] 105 points 2 days ago* (3 children)

    Germany's education minister has branded the ban on the small brass memorial plaques a "scandal".

    Germany's education minister is from the same party that cooperated with fascists for this ban. From the same party of our chancellor who loudly proclaimed that everyone cooperating with the AfD will get excluded from the party... before then trying to push anti-immigration legislation through with the AfD against the then governing SPD-Greens-FDP coalition.

    They are –like all "conservatives" nowadays– openly lying to our faces and not even trying to hide it anymore. At this point it's basically just mocking the voters because getting rid of democracy with the help of the far-right is their very obvious plan anyway.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    Muss Spahn nun auch um seinen Platz im Haushaltsausschuss bangen? in c/deutschland@feddit.org
    [–] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

    Den ganzen Haufen Techmilliardäre im politischen Spektrum von extem libertär bis zu Anarcho-Kapitalismus.

    Die Irren, die schon offen von ihren eigenen quasi souveränen Stadtstaaten unter alleiniger Kontrolle des jeweiligen Kapitalisten an der Spitze träumen. Und die Typen, die lautstark darüber reden, dass Demokratie und Freiheit nicht vereinbar sind, weil ihre Definition von Freiheit bedeutet: absolute Freiheit (vorallem vor Konsequenzen) für sie, und mit dem Pöbel machen können, was sie wollen.
    Und wenn es mit der Herrschaft sonst nicht klappt, sind die großflächigen Bunker und Privatinseln auch schon in Planung. Ich glaube derzeit geht es da eher nur noch darum, ob man so ziemlich alles mit KI regeln kann oder doch noch menschliches Personal benötigt (und mit welchen Mitteln man die unter Kontrolle halten kann – ich glaube die allseits beliebten Schock-Halsbänder liegen derzeit vorn).

    Ist jetzt alles kein Geheimnis. Dafür ist der Haufen zu großmäulig und von ihrer eigenen Überlegenheit überzeugt.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • NRW verliert das Rennen um Olympia-Bewerbung in c/nrw@feddit.org
    [–] 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)

    Nicht, dass ich mir das Elend mit Olympia antun wollte, aber das ist ja nun kein Naturgesetz.

    Keine gute Infrastruktur haben und keine gut Infrastruktur rausbekommen, haben etwas gemeinsam: dass man sie halt nicht bauen will.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • 25
    Need some ELI5 on proxy_pass in Nginx, in particular regarding having Anubis in the chain (feddit.org)
    submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
    11 comments fedilink
     

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›