[–] 1 point 1 hour ago* (last edited 49 minutes ago)

If it was a “massive threat” they would’ve lobbied long and hard long ago, joining with the MPAA and RIAA

They are in fact lobbying for legislation that declares self-hosting a security risk and akin to piracy. The fact that they use Minecraft servers as an example actually shows that this is not even remotely a new thing, but that they are working on those idiotic arguments for quite some time.

In the 90s and 2000s self-hosting was just not as simple yet. But nowadays cheap SoCs can basically handle the vast majority of the stuff they want to "sell" you as a service (and get your private data at the same time). The new frontier is AI (and only because they have driven up pices so much - else even self-hosted AI would be more prevalent). Everything else most people use, from messages to calendars to collaboration tools to media hubs to "cloud" storage, you can do yourself on devices with some low double digit price tag (the storage itself is now the more expensive part - again thanks to the AI bubble). Or next to free given all the older consumer hardware Windows11 just made obsolete...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago*

    Wolltest du jemandem antworten, der das behauptet hat?

    Ich hab auf die Aussage, dass in polarisierten Zeit auch unpolitische Veranstaltungen wünschenswert seien, geantwortet, dass es doch gar kein Problem gibt, da die Ablehnung von Extremisten schließlich eine unpolitische und demokratische Mehrheitsmeinung ist. Was has du stattdessen gelesen?

    Sorry, wenn "Nazis raus" für dich kontrovers ist. Für geistig gesunde Menschen ist die Ablehung von Extremisten nicht politisch, sondern normal.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 8 hours ago* (2 children)

    I'm more irritated than I'd like to admit by the fact that there is no 12V to 6x SATA power converter going with that M.2 to 6x SATA adapter.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 hours ago

    it’s just Arch with some very badly written vibecoded scripts thrown on top

    FTFY.

    But that's enough to become popular and get money if the far-right decides to use their controlled media to push your shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago*

    Was sollen sie denn stattdessen tun, wenn Krieg gegen Deutschland geführt wird? Pläne für ein souveränes Militär, das Deutschland nicht hat, aufstellen? Oder doch lieber Aufsätze schreiben, wie man die UN argumentativ davon überzeugt, dass Deutschland sich verteidigen darf? Ach nee, da gibt's ja Länder mit Vetorecht. 😅

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 hours ago

    So soll es ja auch sein. Die Idioten sollen Merz hassen, damit sie beim nächsten Mal wieder brav CDU wählen. Denn es ist immer nur die gerade aktuelle Personalie problematisch, und solche Leute machen nie einfach nur das, wofür die CDU sie in die Position bestellt hat.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›