[–] 5 points 4 hours ago* (1 child)

Aber das macht uns und alles andere nicht besser

Doch tut es. Denn dann gibt es paar Exemplare unterster Menschenheitsabschaum weniger, und der Rest entwickelt zeitnah wieder Hemmungen mit ihrem Menschenhass hausieren zu gehen und ihren geistigen Abfall zu verbreiten.

Aber da wir halt mehrheitlich brav und friedlich sein wollen, scheitert es beim letzten Schritt, der nötig wäre, das Toleranzparadoxon wirklich zu verstehen, und entsprechend zu handeln.

In diesem Sinne möchte also hier ein gewisses Känguruh zitieren: "Wer einen Nazi sieht, muss ihn boxen."

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    Nö, die Realität ist nicht schwarz und weiß. Es gibt sicher auch eine kleine Minderheit, die man noch erreichen kann. Nur fällt die erfahrungsgemäß nicht in Gewicht. Womit dann in Wahrheit näherungsweise tatsächlich all die hirntoten Propagandaopfer hirntote Propagandaofter sind.

    Klar kannst du darüber diskutieren, dass es doch sicher auch irgendwo valide Kritiker der Methodik gibt. Dann kannst du sie suchen und konstruktiv mit ihnen diskutieren... und bist beschäftigt, weil du nicht kapierst, dass es völlig irrelevant ist, ob du sie überzeugst. Sie sind eine unbedeutende Randerscheinung. Und die lügenden Propagandisten schreien in der Zeit, in der du abgelenkt bist, schonmal weiter und erlassen bereits Gesetze zur Kriminalisierung der Mitgliedschaft in einer Vereinigung, die gar nicht existiert.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 9 hours ago* (1 child)

    SpaceX is just worse but there were still a lot of explosions etc over the years. Ariane 5 for example used the tried and tested software of its predecessor... and failed rather spectacular mid-air when its higher accelaration paired with 16bit to 64bit conversion caused a buffer overflow.

    Or to quote what I consider a modern classic nowadays: "They say Space is hard..." *sing*

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 9 hours ago

    Demand more work hours for less pay, undermine social systems to reduce costs for his rich corporate buddies, scrap climate protections as the unfair and expensive burden on his billionaire boss friends and loudly proclaim –for the 100th time– that we need to get rid of the (imaginary) "combustion engine ban" because those are obviously the future.

    Insanely corrupt puppets of (mainly fossil fuel) lobbyists only know one song. But as long as the majority of voters stays brain-dead and keeps voting for the problem as the alleged solution, that still somehow works. Well... not for the ecocomy, country or population of course, but for him and his buddies getting richer.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 17 hours ago*

    < [...]und damit Resonanz bekommt. Warum bekommt sie die

    Du fragst das, als würde es an der Nachricht selbst liegen und nicht schlicht und ergreifend an Reichweite und Einfluss rechter Medien, die keinerlei Skrupel haben, Menschen zu belügen und Meinung zu machen, statt zu informieren.

    Irgendwie endet die Fragestellung "was können wie dagegen tun" letztendlich immer in dem Märchen, dass die Parteien selber schuld sind und nur besser kommunizieren müssen. Denn daran, dass der deutsche Medienapparat kaputt ist, darf kann es ja nicht liegen. Rechte sind halt nur so toll im Kreischen und die unfähigen Grünen und Linken wissen nicht, wie man ordentlich kommuniziert. Selber Schuld, wenn die ihre Nachrichten nicht an den Mann bringen. ^/s^

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 26 points 17 hours ago* (1 child)

    not the more economically feasible equatorial orbit

    You somehow manage to make that sound like polar orbits are a minor thing and equatorial orbits are superior and harder to reach when it's the opposite. Equatorial in earth's rotational direction is the by far easiest one. That's the default because every other orbit is a lot harder in comparison.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 18 hours ago* (1 child)

    ...or if you are living in Russia and your location too far north makes satellites in geo-synchronous orbit sub-optimal because their angle means a much longer distance signals have to travel through that pesky stuff we breath.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 11 points 18 hours ago* (3 children)

    as Europe enters satellite launch race

    Sure... Europe isn't launching satellites for decades.

    This isn't about satellite launching, Europe does this from Guiana Space Centre in Kourou for a very long time.

    This is about it being the first successfull orbital launch from a European location (so without all that nice free speed you get when going for an equatorial orbit and starting close to the equator eastwards) by a private start-up less than 8 years old. On their second try in total (people following such things might remember the huge amount of explosions Rapid Unscheduled Disassemblies starting rocket projects –privat or otherwise– tend to produce in the beginning).

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 18 hours ago* (1 child)

    It's best near the equator (and starting eastwards) if you want an equatorial orbit because then you get all the rotational energy from earth for free.

    But if you want an polar orbit, so 90° to earth's rotation that passes over north and south pole, you are not just missing out on the free speed but the rotation perpendicular to the direction you are going actually is a problem you need to compensate for with more energy spend. But the further north (or south) to the pole you move for your start the less influence has the earth's rotation. The perfect scenario here would be a start exactly from the geographic north pole for no interference through earth's rotation.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›