sorted by: new top controversial old
ADAC: Benzin-Kleinwagen kosten fast 80 Prozent mehr als vor zehn Jahren in c/verkehrswende@feddit.org
[–] 1 point 7 minutes ago*

Ist denn noch niemand auf die offensichtliche Lösung gekommen? Wir brauchen mehr Luxuskarossen jenseits der 70,000€ und noch mehr Subventionen für Kauf/Leasing von übergroßen Firmenwagen! Und ich hab auch schon seit fast drei Tagen keinen schrillen Schrei nach der Rettung des Verbrenners gehört...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    Cyber Resilience Act: EU Commission provides more clarity for open source in c/europe@feddit.org
    [–] 1 point 3 hours ago*

    how little people talk about CRA

    People talk about the things the mainstream media tells them to talk about. Why would we be talking about something that actually affects us when we can talk about evil immigrants, the importance to spend billions on arms and the dire need to kill social systems?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • ARD-DeutschlandTrend: Mehrheit will staatliche Hilfen für Autoindustrie in c/dach@feddit.org
    ARD-DeutschlandTrend: Mehrheit will staatliche Hilfen für Autoindustrie in c/dach@feddit.org
    [–] 3 points 3 hours ago

    Ist denen erst dieses Jahr aufgefallen dass der verbrenner tot ist?

    Hä? Wie kommst du bei einem Konzern, der mit teilweise 8+ Monaten Lieferzeit für EVs über geringe Werksauslastung jammert, und der der bereits die Schließung von Werken, in denen Elektroautos gebaut werden, plant, auf die Idee, denen wäre es überhaupt schon aufgefallen?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Yes, no AI is now a feature - the Document Foundation in c/technology@beehaw.org
    A pair of spacecraft draw closer to Mercury after nearly decade-long voyage in c/space@mander.xyz
    And thats why we call it Baud Rate in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
    Why Big Tech’s Lobbyists Are Targeting Self-Hosted Servers in c/selfhost@lemmy.ml
    [–] 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

    If it was a “massive threat” they would’ve lobbied long and hard long ago, joining with the MPAA and RIAA

    They are in fact lobbying for legislation that declares self-hosting a security risk and akin to piracy. The fact that they use Minecraft servers as an example actually shows that this is not even remotely a new thing, but that they are working on those idiotic arguments for quite some time.

    In the 90s and 2000s self-hosting was just not as simple yet. But nowadays cheap SoCs can basically handle the vast majority of the stuff they want to "sell" you as a service (and get your private data at the same time). The new frontier is AI (and only because they have driven up pices so much - else even self-hosted AI would be more prevalent). Everything else most people use, from messages to calendars to collaboration tools to media hubs to "cloud" storage, you can do yourself on devices with some low double digit price tag (the storage itself is now the more expensive part - again thanks to the AI bubble). Or next to free given all the older consumer hardware Windows11 just made obsolete...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Alphaville von Glücksgefühle-Festival ausgeladen in c/dach@feddit.org
    [–] -1 points 17 hours ago*

    Wolltest du jemandem antworten, der das behauptet hat?

    Ich hab auf die Aussage, dass in polarisierten Zeit auch unpolitische Veranstaltungen wünschenswert seien, geantwortet, dass es doch gar kein Problem gibt, da die Ablehnung von Extremisten schließlich eine unpolitische und demokratische Mehrheitsmeinung ist. Was has du stattdessen gelesen?

    Sorry, wenn "Nazis raus" für dich kontrovers ist. Für geistig gesunde Menschen ist die Ablehung von Extremisten nicht politisch, sondern normal.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Alphaville von Glücksgefühle-Festival ausgeladen in c/dach@feddit.org
    Expanding my laptops HDD capacity in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
    [–] 9 points 1 day ago* (2 children)

    I'm more irritated than I'd like to admit by the fact that there is no 12V to 6x SATA power converter going with that M.2 to 6x SATA adapter.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    „Die haben die schlimmsten Bretter gezogen“: Berliner Rapper Ski Aggu erzählt von angeblicher Drogenparty mit Jens Spahn in c/dach@feddit.org
    25
    Need some ELI5 on proxy_pass in Nginx, in particular regarding having Anubis in the chain (feddit.org)
    submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
    11 comments fedilink
     

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›