Dass das der Plan ist, ist offensichtlich. Darauf bezog sich mein Kommentar aber nicht.

Weder der Bayrische Rundfunk noch der hier zitierte Energieökonom gehören der C*U (oder meinerwegen auch allgemein der Regierung) an. Also nochmal... Wie kommt der von unseren Gebühren finanzierte ÖRR mit einer expliziten Pflicht Menschen objektiv zu informieren dazu das offensichtliche Lügenmärchen von den verfügbaren Bio-Brennstoffen weiter zu verbreiten? Das ist ja nicht mal mehr nur regierungfreundliches Framing, sondern eiskalte Desinformation. Müssen die wirklich zwanghaft jedes Narrativ des rechten Abschaums bestätigen und wollen sich die Bezeichnung Lügenpresse jetzt redlich verdienen? Daher: Dumm oder korrupt? Ich hätte halt gern Antworten, wieso man sich dermaßen selbst zerlegen sollte solchen Müll zu verbreiten.

Wenige werden davon mitbekommen haben

Und in wie fern passt das nicht in die oben genannten Kategorien?

Note that Windows will boot just fine on a disk with multiple ESPs

Nice for Windows to support this theoretically but the UEFI standard does not require support for multiple ESPs on a disk, so you will easily find hardware that in fact will simply discover the first ESP then stop. Because actual implementations matter and a lot of them are bad.

Speaking of bad implementations. We got several manufacturers a few years ago where their UEFI implementation broke and bricked the whole device after editing the EFI entries via efibootmgr exactly as defined by standard. Oh, you wanted to install Linux? Your device is now done because no one ever tested them without anything but the Windows pre-installs.

Yet two other cases of totally coincidental "This should work but doesn't, must be a Linux issue" artificially created by Microsoft (who after all were one of the driving forces behind UEFI development, also the reason we are still stuck with FAT32 ESPs - the only file system ESPs are required to support by the standard with everything else optional).

Windows never touched the main EFI entry in my cases

In the end positive anecdotal experiences don't matter much. If a relevant fraction of users has issues that should not exist when installing Linux (and that obviously don't exist with Windows because here OEMs actually do proper testing here... or it's Windows/Microsoft itself causing the issues (pre-installed key, fast boot shenanigans, hardware that should be supported but randomly isn't etc.)) that's helping to prevent a lot of people from trying it in the first place. And that's by design.

Why would Russia react differently knowing that the majority of Europeans are brain-washed idiots easily manipulated by bots.

Russia sells <10% of their (already deminished, too) exports to Europe, yet an idiotic article without any actual references makes you believe that Europe is failing and has to be blamed. Sanctions totally demolished Russian imports, yet for years we get articles hallucinating how the import increases in neighbouring countries obviously circumvent those sanctions - even when in reality those increases make up less than 1% in total of what Russia lost, so the actual story should have been that they are 99%+ effective.

It's always the same pattern: "Look, big number! Be angry!! Europe bad!!!" And it works -as can be seen by all the comments here- every single time. Or did you actually stop one second to check those numbers in relation to former imports? Or in relation to Russia's output? Or did you even notice that the article very much avoids to give any reference for their numbers in the first place?

Being obviously unable to annex Ukraine, not even in the planned few days but at all, did not stop them from continuing. But losing about 5% of their already failing economy that is now basically tailored to producing weapons for the war exclusively would totally have made them stop. Sure...

Interesting... I get a different post on mobile than on desktop where the exact same link somehow leads me here WTF?

An seine Stelle tritt die sogenannte Bio-Treppe ab 2029. "Schrittweise fährt man den Anteil von klimafreundlichen Brennstoffen hoch, bis man in die Klimaneutralität kommt".

Wie verwirrt (oder wahlweise korrupt) muss man sein, um dieses Märchen einfach so weiter zu erzählen, ohne die Miene zu verziehen? Es wird genauso wenig klimafreundliche Brennstoffe zum Heizen in benötigten Mengen geben wie eFuels zum Weiterbetrieb von Verbrennen, egal wie hart man Realität und Naturgesetze leugnet.

For example:

We have two storages (e.g., SSD): /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.

Install Windows on /dev/sdb (so it creates its own ESP);

Install Linux on /dev/sda (so it creates its own ESP), with a normal/manual partitioning:
- /boot/ (for Kernels I have 4 GiB+);
- /boot/efi/ (commonly, from 128 to 512 MiB is enough);
- Here I normally also have a swap partition, and separate: /home/, /var/;
- Select Grub to be installed on the /dev/sda;

Boot the Grub in /dev/sda;

Update Grub within Linux, so it finds the Windows EFI on another drive via its os-prober.

Here, I believe efibootmgr should show the existing EFI, or you could check it manually in /boot/efi after.

Windows should operate on its own ESP it created on its own storage, and don’t overwrite the Grub.

At voila!

Then Windows will fuck up your EFI entries. Which is not a big deal if you know what you are doing but a completely different story for the audience you are explicitly addressing here when you even explain how to check those entries in the first place.

Also you did not actually mention that fastboot needs to be disabled in Windows, thus a clueless person will not understand the random hardware errors on Linux caused by not properly initialized devices and will blame Linux.

(And let's not even talk about some of the really insane stuff like pre-installed Microsoft SecureBoot keys that brick you whole system when removed because idiotic OEMs signed their own hardware's EFI drivers with the keys already pre-installed just because they can...)

So no, it's not "quite odd to see so many people having the issue when Windows". That's what Windows is causing, often intentionally so. Is most of this easily fixable? Sure... But it's a very effective deterrent for many people, so they never reach the point where they understand and be able to fix that stuff.

Then Windows will fuck up the EFI entry itself. Easy to fix of course but a pain in the ass when you are just starting with Linux and have barely any idea other than reinstalling for the 10th time in a few weeks.

It is also really important to just be honest with where the German economy stands right now

Exactly where most of it stands for decades. It's based on constant lobbying of "We want back to the 1980 at the very latest. Give public money so we can refuse any innovation and adapt legislation to stifle any competition for us. Thx, here are some board meberships in exchange."

Welt-Pommes-Tag ist im August.

Der 13. Juli ist French-Fry-Day in den USA. Tun wir schon wieder so als wären die die Welt?

That's an improvement over always being the dedicated tech support anyway, no matter how often you explain to them that you have not bothered to take a look at Windows and all its specific issues for a decade or more...

What does "getting caught" mean? They do it quite openly with everyone knowing and zero real consequences.