[–] 4 points 45 minutes ago* (1 child)

Sie haben es dennoch versucht, weil sie einfach nichts besseres können.

Nein, sie machen diese rechte Scheißpolitik, weil sie genau diese rechte Scheißpolitik machen wollen.

Dass es einer anderen Partei tatsächlich nur zu Stimmen verhilft, wenn man deren Themen aufgreift, weiß auch die CDU sehr gut. Schließlich bekämpfen sie jeden Umwelt- und Klimaschutz, egal wie sehr er programmatisch passend oder wirtschaftlich sinnvoll wäre, mit Händen und Füßen, wohlwissentlich dass es sonst den Grünen helfen könnte.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 48 minutes ago

    Schön, dass Leute es immer noch nicht verstanden haben...

    SIE KÖNNEN ES OHNE DIE NÖTIGEN STIMMEN NICHT.
    GENAUSO WIE SIE NICHT GEGEN DIE GRUNDRECHTSVERSTÖẞE DER CDU KLAGEN KÖNNEN OHNE AUSREICHEND STIMMEN.

    Und die selben Menschen sind dann auch die, die keine Oppositonsparteien wählen, weil die ja (eben mangels Stimmen) eh nichts ausrichten. Wann wurde der Politikunterricht in Deutschland eigentlich abgeschafft?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 52 minutes ago

    Im Gegenteil, die sind sogar noch stärker geworden.

    Ist ja auch genau das erwartbare Ergebnis. Und das weiß auch die CDU sehr gut. Die ist schließlich tunlichst bedacht auch das letzte Bißchen Umweltschutz zu bekämpfen, auch wenn das tatsächlich nur Geld verschlingt, aus Angst, dass das Thema ansonsten den Grünen zu Stimmen verhelfen könnte.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 59 minutes ago

    No, they struggle to cut ties because they don't want to.

    "€15m in EU funds" is meant to impress people with some big number they can't practically imagine, but it's a miniscule joke compared to actual EU numbers. If there was any interest, they would simply do it.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 hour ago*

    Ist halt der weitverbreitete Dachschaden.

    Wenn Neolibralismus alles kaputt macht, kann nur noch mehr Neoliberalismus helfen. Wenn rechte Korruption dein Leben verteuert, damit ein paar überreiche Spender noch reicher werden, und versucht dich mit xenophoben Parolen davon abzulenken, dann kann nur der selbe Wahn im Quadrat bei den Rechtsradikalen helfen.

    Ich versteh es nicht, egal wie oft ich es versuche. Aber leider hab ich das Muster zu oft gesehen.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago*

    Because the fictious person stealing your laptop and drilling through your disk to erase it identifies as male. I have a whole backstory worked out if you are interested...

    Or because it doesn't matter at all and two letters were simply the shortest.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

    Yes, I am in fact okay with refering to every teacher as he, because that's what grammar in my native language demands ("Lehrer, der - masc."). I will also happily refer to every guard as she, because –again– grammar ("Wache, die - fem.).

    Genus != sexus != gender... One is grammar, one is biology, one is identity. Overlaps are purely coincidental. I don't understand why especially English speakers can't get the concept. I mean sure, they dumbed down their grammar so much that they lost the destinction, but even unrelated to language they seem to develop an insane fetish for conflating sexus and gender somehow. For example if you need to add "biological" before "gender" for your expression to make sense, that should be a hint that you are actually talking bout different things.

    Fun fact: When English tried to move away from gender specific words and towards generic ones (all being actors, instead of speaking about actors and actresses), other languages did the exact opposite. Because when you language's grammar has all nouns (arbitrarily) gendered, actresses and actors is a step forward from the generic actor (which often is male my grammatical definition). At least that was the theory in both cases. Two languages, two exactly opposite reactions to same fact. Why doesn't it make any sense? Because it's a fucking narrative to keep some culture war bullshit going. Language isn't sexist. The Sexism filtering your words because they reach your brain is.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago* (1 child)

    The fairy tale German politicians and the media tell 24/7 of how high energy costs for the industry and much too high wages are the problem. And this is after all about a German CEO calling for lower wages "to safeguard Germany's prosperity and welfare state".

    When in reality Germany, so the other 99,999999% but him, are struggling because of low wages that in no way represent their economic output, high and rising energy costs –exactly so the industry gets lower costs– and with the pension, social and health system not looking sustainable, but again not because of the delusions this guy and his other rich friends are spreading, but because they are linked to stagnating wages. Suggesting more less and lower pay so his profit margins go up and the country is more fucked is simply insane... or just shameless. Yeah, probably the latter.

    Wasn't meant personally in any way. As I said, it sounds logical without a closer look. So I told how it looks from the inside.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 6 hours ago*

    Zeit gewinnen wofür?

    Da es hier um die Aussagen eines CDU-Mitglieds geht: Zeit, um Diskussionnen über die geplante Haselnusskoalition ausreichend zu normalisieren. Und Zeit, zu zeigen dass man gegen eine nahezu absolute Mehrheit der Faschisten nicht konstruktiv regieren kann, also die Kooperation mit ihnen die einzig richtige Entscheidung ist. Weil Wählerwille... staatstragende Verantwortung... <hier weitere Worthülsen einfügen>...

  • source
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›