[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 1 hour ago

This whole "we can't stop screaming about our pedophile president yet are too corrupt for actual consequences, too complacent for action and too stupid to not be distracted by yet another war the moronic orange started"-shitshow gets boring after a while. And for the people directly affected by your wars it's even worse. How about you actually fix your corrupt authoritarian state or shut up and live with the failed state you are seemingly too lazy to do anything against?

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Oh, chat control in general much more even.

But this specific vote by the parliament when they rejected to extend this bullshit chat control 1.0 temporary exception was instantly repeated within a week because the right-wing morons didn't like the result. They got the same one again, so they now cheated and introduced the same thing again via the EU commision instead, one day before the summer break when not enough parliament members were still there to reject it a third time.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 8 points 16 hours ago

Was sollen die denn da groß installieren? Einfach im Rahmen von Sparmaßnahmen gegen die böse Verschwendung von Geldern die kleine Minderheit rauswerfen, die im ÖRR noch Minimalansprüche an journalistische Integrität haben. Der Rest macht doch schon bereits fröhlich mit und springt über jedes Stöckchen, das ihnen rechte Politik und Presse hinwerfen.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 40 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

35 years ago: We should do something about climate change but it's important to see first how to do it without any effects on industry and economy.

25 years ago: We should really do something about climate change but let's evaluate the option again, or their might be an effect on the economy.

15 years ago: We now know that we don't need actually so anything. Just set climate goals, establish CO₂ trading and let the wonderful free market work its magic.

5 years ago: We should actually really increase CO₂ costs to more realistic levels but then our rich donors could feel offended so let's keep those plans with unrealistical steep increases much too late.

Now: We really need to scrap the cimate targets as CO₂ is finally beginning to have an effect (who would have thought?) and our stalwart rejection of any actual technology/industry not dependent on obsolete fossil fuel burning means negative effects for the economy.

10 years from now: We really, really tried (trust us... we did totally not fuck you over for benefits from our friends in the fossil fuel industry...) but seemingly action against climate change is simply impossible so let's stop trying.

PS: Also let's never talk about businesses/economy/industry that invested in a green transition, constantly criticise this insane flip-flopping, and gets also fucked over all the time. That's not the story we should hear, so the media makes sure we won't.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Das ist -wie so oft- kein Problem der jungen Menschen.

Ich hab mein Leben lang viel gelesen und kaufe auch viel weniger Bücher. Eben weil die Menge an vernünftigen Neuerscheinungen ständig abnimmt, viele Buchhandlungen unterirdisch sind (wenn ich den Eindruck habe, dass mein Kaufwunsch 'ne Belästigung der Mitarbeiter ist und sie mir eh am liebsten Amazon empfehlen, sollen sie halt zu machen...), und eben auch wegen lauter Regale mit dem gerade gängigen BookTok Müll statt Qualität oder gar Auswahl (von Beratung will ich gar nicht reden, die ist schon vor einem Jahrzehnt verstorben).

Wenn ich wirklich unbedingt einer modernen Änderung eine Teilschuld zuordnen wollte, dann wäre es der eBook-Reader und wie einfach es ist, Ausgaben von Büchern zu finden, die man eh schon im Regal stehen (oder bei der Menge eher in irgendeiner Kiste verstaut) hat. Da kann ich jederzeit spontan entscheiden, was ich nach Jahren oder Jahrzehnten mal wieder lesen möchte, ohne ein neues Buch zu kaufen...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 23 hours ago

If people think there is actually a connection between masculinity culture and climate denial, they are already wrong.

There is no connection, just a correlation. The actually connection is that both are two of the million artificially created fronts of the culture war to divert us.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Und würden angebliche Verfechter von Datenschutz nicht regelmäßig mit Desinformationsmüll wie diesem hier auffallen, könnte man tatsächlich etwas erreichen.

  1. Es gibt keine Pflicht zur Kameraüberwachung des Innenraums. Das ist lediglich eine Art dem Implementation des vorgeschriebenen Sensors

  2. Es gibt keine Datenschutzfragen. Bei einer Implementierung als Kamerasystem ist das Ganze verpflichtend als abgeschlossenes System zu implementieren.

Wäre Datenschutz das tatsächliche Thema, könnte man bei der Wahrheit bleiben und die wirklichen Fragen ansprechen. Was sind die Alternativen zu einem Kamerasystem? Wie kann man auch ein Kamerasysteme so implementieren, dass wirklich nur die nötigsten Daten überhaupt erfasst werden? Wer prüft und überwacht die Implementierung als Closed-Loop System?

Stattdessen schwurbelt man von vorgeschriebener Kameraüberwachung des Innenraums und macht damit jede sinnvolle Diskussion unmöglich.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 23 points 23 hours ago

Petitions are useless

Protests are useless

Governments and corporations conspire to implement surveilance knowing what comes next

<-- we are here

Actual resistence

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 17 points 23 hours ago

a majority voted against

Twice... because they already refused to accept the result the first time.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

Wieso /s ?

Wenn man immer und immer wieder ganz bewusst funktionierende Konzepte ignoriert, um stattdessen datenschutztechnischen Mist abzuliefern, ist das doch sehr offensichtlich tatsächlich die Intention.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago

Kann mich jemand über die CDU-Interna aufklären, die hierzu geführt haben? Denn dass konsequentes Lügen in der CDU ein Grund für Widerstand aus der Partei sei, ist ja offensichtlich und gut dokumentiert Blödsinn.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The government confirmed plans to expand renewables, so that by 2030 at least 80% of generation will be emissions-free. It further confirmed plans to shut down coal-fired power stations by 2038.

While actually sabotaging renewables left and right, so they can -with very sad faces of course- announce in 2030 that they have totally missed the goal so it obviously wasn't possible. Then they will repeat the same farce with coal 8 years later.

Environmentalists predicted costs could rise further and said battery technology was being neglected as an alternative

Not neglceted but intentionally blocked. There exist a lot more applications for connecting batteries to the grid than are required for the next decade (all privately financed so from the state planing perspective for free...). But they simply won't happen as the grid providers are tightly linked with power producers that make their money from fossil fuels. In fact the CEO of one of the best in terms of blockage where applications are literally delayed by years was recently rewarded with a job as Minister of Economy and Energy by those corrupt lying morons.

while ~~power generators~~ fossil fuel heavy energy companies welcomed the legislation as a pragmatic compromise (the ones with actual investments in renewables are loudly criticising the move but somehow don't exist in mostly conservative-controlled media reports).

Fixed that statement.

PS: Oh, and those gas power plants are needed so urgently *cough* that this government also wasted a year by completely scrapping the existing plans for a new one, only to realize that they won't get the EU agreements for the insane numbers they would have liked to build and going back to the original plan... minus the alleged hydrogen-compatibility of course because failing the energy transition and burning fossil fuels forever is their actual plan.

35
submitted 1 month ago by Ooops@feddit.org to c/unixporn@lemmy.world

25
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Ooops@feddit.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

# serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

Which works well.

And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

So long story short...

How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

view more: next ›

Ooops

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago