[–] 1 point 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Was sich dann durchaus durch eine zunehmende Verbreitung von Wärmepumpen und eAutos erklären lässt

Oder dadurch, dass sich die Mehrheit derer, die nicht die Wahl haben, einfach vernünftiges Heizen und jede Strecke, die über den absolut notwendigen Arbeitsweg hinausgeht, nicht mehr leisten können.

Wärmepumpen mögen zwar extrem zugelegt haben (lies: Verzwanzigfachung in zwei Jahrzehnten), aber machen trotzdem vielleicht gerade mal 20% der installierten Ölheizungen aus.

Edit/PS: Statistik weiter unten hier im Thread. Es gibt also immer noch 4 mal soviele Ölheizungen wie Wärmepumpen und der überwiegende Wechsel von Öl ging hin zu Gas.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    Anger at corrupt right-wing populists mobilizes people and drives change.

    Which only means they need to shift focus and spend even more to guide the voters anger into a better direction, like evil minorities and totally imaginary threats...

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 hours ago*

    Because people are f***ing idiots.

    Getting a remotely accessible freezer sounds dumb, but you can save money because now you don't need to pay someone to check and document the temperature for compliance reasons anymore.

    Not securing that device at all sounds really stupid, but it saves you money to not pay someone to actually set the devices up properly. Bonus points: anyone even midly competent would have told you that remote control instead of just read access for temperature logging is incredible stupid. And then you would need to spend money on better devices after already having paid someone for competent advice. Better save that money.

    Speaking of mildly competent people you don't want to pay... They would also have told you beforehand that a limited time-frame in which you still get security patches for your devices is a stupid idea, too. But hey... buying the product with only 10 years or so guaranteed support saves you –again– money today.

    And let's be honest. After your device reached EOL you are not actually replacing it anyway. You didn't care about basic security before, so what's the problem now with unpatched devices not getting any support anymore? After all they still cool things without costing any additional money...

    Wow... look at all the savings. That will totally get you a bonus. One you will definitely not need to pay back after everything went to shit because you are an idiot.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 4 hours ago* (2 children)

    It gets worse once you realize that in most cases you heard of in the last weeks there was no actual hack to speak of involved (although a lot of them were unpatched EOL devices, too), but just accessing them with the default password.

    So having remotely controllable freezers in the first place isn't even the beginning of the stupidity involved. They are also often completely unsecured and nobody cares.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago

    aber ob die Deutschen soviel besser sind?

    Korrupte, rechte Scheiße in Schwarz, korrupte, rechte Scheiße in Blau und sogar noch Reste von korrupter, rechter Scheiße in Gelb: zusammen mit deutlicher Mehrheit, nach Sitzen im Bereich ⅔.

    Also Nein. Die Deutschen sind sogar noch dümmer und dazu noch geschichtsvergessen. Nur halt auch etwas langsamer...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

    Dann ist dein Umfeld aber die Minderheit mit Eigenheimen. Ich kenn hier noch diverse Ölheizungen und hab in den letzten paar Jahren noch diverse neue Gasheizungen erlebt, weil das ist billiger für den Vermieter, und dass sich das Mieterpack dumm und dämlich zahlt, ist ja nicht deren Problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 8 hours ago* (2 children)

    It's simply faster. Do you strrictly need a GPU-accelerated terminal? No. Or in your case of not doing much in terminal anyway: not at all.

    But with modern terminals (true color, lots of utf-8 glyphs) on big 4k screens using multiple tabs you can literally see the performance difference (quicker tabbing, faster and smoother scrolling, even just how fast a command that spits out a lot of text –hello debugging– runs through) without needing benchmarks.
    And that's still just text. Watching (previews of) graphics files or even playing videos directly inside your terminal is actually possible with modern feature-rich browsers.

    Also just from a pure efficiency point of view: If it runs more efficient on my GPU that's energy saved, so a few more minutes of battery time on my laptop.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 19 hours ago* (1 child)

    Aber es ist ja so nett alles via App steuern zu können

    Es ist aber auch nicht zielführend, das als Argument voranzustellen, wenn das Hauptproblem die absolute Dummheit von ungesicherten, nicht mehr regelmäßig gepatchten und mit Standardpasswörtern versehenen Geräten ist.

    Klar, kann man sich fragen, was überhaupt wirklich Fernzugriff braucht. Aber das kommt halt erst viel, viel später, in der detaillierten Sicherheits- und Bedrohungsanalyse, nachdem man das absolute Minimum abgehakt. Aber das schaffen die ja scheinbar schon nicht.

    Das ist in etwa so, als wenn wir die Diskussion über das nicht allzu hochwertige Türschluss starten, während die Tür tatsächlich nicht nur eh offen, sondern auch noch ausgehängt neben dem Türrahmen steht. Der Wunsch Geräte aus der Ferne überwachen zu wollen, ist hier nicht das primäre Problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›