[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago

Wenn was passiert doch auch.

Oder weißt du immer noch nicht, wie du missliebige Mitmenschen loswerden kannst, ohne mehr als 'ne Geldstrafe und einen symbolischen Klapps auf die Finger zu bekommen?

Spoiler🚘🍷

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 11 hours ago

Es geht nicht um Rechtfertigung, sondern schlicht darum, dass er nur das minderwertige Pack schädigen wollte, dass zu faul, arm oder verblendet ist, sich wie ein guter Deutscher ein Auto zu kaufen.

Wenn du nicht zur priviligierten Subspezies Autofahrer oder Rentner gehörst, wird das deutsche Recht inzwischen regelmäßig zum maximalen Täterschutz ausgereizt.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Sadly no.

AI could indeed replace low skilled labour as well as the bullshit most CEO are considering work. However the CEOs investing massively in the AI bubble are dreaming of the exactly opposite: Replace the skilled jobs of all those pesky people demanding actual wages and have everyone be a low-paid, well-conmtrolled peasant under their leadership.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, we already knew how how propagandists operate. No need to spell it out what your are doing here.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, that's a nice fairy tales to keep burning the planet.

In reality the main consumers are a handful of rich people including those owning the corporations and paying off politicians and media while 95% of the people would not consume anything if not forced to do it and are also contributing only a miniscule amount to the total consumption.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 12 points 17 hours ago

Auch das ist nicht wirklich richtig. Es geht stets nur für die Freiheit vor Konsequenzen für sich selbst.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Why? Rivers don't pay taxes, neither do they work for starvation wages. So they don't produce anything of worth to the handful of addholes in control.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 20 hours ago

No, they were that big and indeed quite floppy, too (only half as thick as those 3.5" disks and from rather soft plastic).

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 20 hours ago

Entschuldige das Missverständnis. Der Teil in Klammern war nicht als Aufforderung gedacht, dein persönliches rassistisches Lieblingsnarrative zu teilen.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 20 hours ago

Das gilt für gar keine Verfassungsfeinde, denn die lassen sich ja für noch mehr Befugnisse und Überwachung instrumentalisieren.

Genauso wie mehr Abschiebungen nie für Straftäter gelten, sondern nur für integrierte Mitmenschen.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 9 points 20 hours ago

Aber wozu dient die Wahl des Wortes denn dann, wenn nicht um eine Erhebung von Jugendsprache?

Ist seit jeher 'ne Langenscheidt Werbeaktion, nichts weiter...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They should charge the officer who entered the given password for criminal stupidity instead...

35
submitted 1 month ago by Ooops@feddit.org to c/unixporn@lemmy.world

25
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Ooops@feddit.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

# serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
server {
	listen 80 default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name _; 
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                \# that's where all actual stuff is located
	}
}
# reroute http traffic with hostname to https
server {
	listen 80;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
	location / {
		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
	}
}
server {
	listen 443 ssl default_server;
	http2 on;
	server_name server_a.bla;
   	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
    	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
	}
}
#actual content here...
server {
	listen 5555;
	http2 on;
    	root /srv/http;
	location / {
        	index index.html;
   	} 
    	location = /page1 {
		return 301 page1.html;
	}
    	location = /page2 {
		return 301 page2.html;
	}
        #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
	location /dav/ {
		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
	}
}

Which works well.

And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

So long story short...

How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

view more: next ›

Ooops

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago