[–] 2 points 4 hours ago*

Or how similar it is to every pro austerity politician ever.

Oh, I forgot one of the highlights as it happened right in the beginning of Merz' tenure. They loudly campaigned on no new debts of course while everyone else agreed that some will be needed (after decades of investment backlog caused by his party). Then they took on an historic amount of debt for investments into defense, the economy and infrastructure the moment they won the elctions... and wasted it all on tax cuts and similiar bullshit while actually investing even less in the crumbling infrastructure than their cash-strapped predecessors did.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago

    Bragging rights are for memes. The actual appeal is a system that just runs (and runs and runs without needing reinstalls or complete upgrade overhauls, thx rolling release), and that you can actually modify (or repair) because it's close to upstream and does not stack one set of configurations on top of the build-in configs and another GUI tool (or two) again managing its own settings on top. All to isolate users from that somehow scary terminal...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago

    Das ist eine Frage der Perspektive. Natürlich kannst du argumentieren, dass alles, was in der Bundeswehr passiert, ein Bundeswehr-spezifisches Problem ist, aber setz ich halt anders an und sage, dass das Problem nicht sexuelles Fehlverhalten oder Führungsversagen ist, sondern der Haufen Rechtsextremer in der Truppe, der sein übliches abscheuliches Verhalten mit einschleppt.

    Also egal von welcher Seite aus du es betrachtest, der hier formulierte Ansatz ist falsch. Egal, ob man es als Bundeswehrproblem, Führungsproblem, Problem des Meldewesens oder was auch immer framed, jedesmal verfehlt man den eigentlich relevanten Fakt.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 26 points 12 hours ago* (2 children)

    Imagine your program being "Fuck the people. They are lazy free-loaders anyway. We need to demolish social security to make the rich richer!" and your reaction to every new low of approval being "We need to stay on our course until all those idiots finally understand our genius!" and you have an accurate picture of Friedrich Merz and his government.

    Now combine this with the fact that Merz took over the party lead with the explicit goal to half the far-right AfD's numbers (~10% back then) but instead spend all his time parroting their talking points (because the voters you lose to the far-right will totally come back if you aim to be a bad copy of the extremists they voted for...) thus making them now stand at ~28% in polls. All while his party also got completely eliminated from parliament in a recent state election by missing the required 5%, a historical first time ever achievement. So his own party (and the remaining voters) aren't thrilled either...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 15 hours ago*

    Where can I get this graphic in better quality and with actually visible lines?

    Edit: Okay, scrap that. At the second attempt the source actually loaded... And it's interactive but not really better.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 16 hours ago* (3 children)

    After decades of keeping wages low to the point where we have a low 2-digit percentage in real wage increases in the same time frame that saw +250% real economic output per capita...

    And at a time when the German economy suffers from low domestic demand in particular, caused by low disposable income...

    They know how to improve the economy: by lowering wages

    Fuck off to your alternative reality where "the economy" is synonymous with the insane wealth increases of the upper <1% at the expense of everyone else!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Ist das ein tatsächliches Problem der Bundeswehr als solche (dass wir demetsprechend Bundeswehr-spezifisch lösen müssen) oder doch nur eine Spiegelung des rechten Abschaums, der sich da wohlfühlt, und in dessen Umfeld genau dieses Verhalten normalisiert, wenn nicht gefördert wird?

  • source
  •  

    As this will -thanks to me being quite clueless- be a very open question I will start with the setup:

    One nginx server on an old Raspi getting ports 80 and 443 routed from the access point and serving several pages as well as some reverse proxies for other sevices.

    So a (very simplified) nginx server-block that looks like this:

    # serve stuff internally (without a hostname) via http
    server {
    	listen 80 default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name _; 
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
                    \# that's where all actual stuff is located
    	}
    }
    # reroute http traffic with hostname to https
    server {
    	listen 80;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
    	location / {
    		return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    	}
    }
    server {
    	listen 443 ssl default_server;
    	http2 on;
    	server_name server_a.bla;
       	ssl_certificate     A_fullchain.pem;
        	ssl_certificate_key A_privkey.pem;
    	location / {
    		proxy_pass http://localhost:5555/;
    	}
    }
    #actual content here...
    server {
    	listen 5555;
    	http2 on;
        	root /srv/http;
    	location / {
            	index index.html;
       	} 
        	location = /page1 {
    		return 301 page1.html;
    	}
        	location = /page2 {
    		return 301 page2.html;
    	}
            #reverse proxy for an example webdav server 
    	location /dav/ {
    		proxy_pass        http://localhost:6666/;
    	}
    }
    

    Which works well.

    And intuitively it looked like putting Anubis into the chain should be simple. Just point the proxy_pass (and the required headers) in the "port 443"-section to Anubis and set it to pass along to localhost:5555 again.

    Which really worked just as expected... but only for server_a.bla, server_a.bla/page1 or server_a.bla/page2.

    server_a.bla/dav just hangs and hangs, to then time out, seemingly trying to open server_a.bla:6666/dav.

    So long story short...

    How does proxy_pass actually work that the first setup works, yet the second breaks? How does a call for localhost:6666 (already behind earlier proxy passes in both cases) somehow end up querying the hostname instead?

    And what do I need to configure -or what information/header do I need to pass on- to keep the internal communication intact?

    view more: next ›