517
submitted 3 days ago by ryper@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

Memory-maker Micron has found a way to keep prices for its products sky-high for another five years, by signing 16 “strategic customer agreements” (SCAs) that include a floor price the company says comes with “a very robust gross margin for Micron, well above our peak quarterly margins in any past cycle.”

Micron CEO, president and chairman Sanjay Mehrotra explained the SCAs in prepared remarks delivered during the company’s Q3 earnings call. He explained that Micron has signed 16 SCAs, most of them covering 2026 to 2030, and that they involve a commitment to buy a certain quantity of product and pay for it in a pricing band that has a floor and a ceiling price. The floor price covers the historically high gross margins mentioned above, and the ceiling price means those who commit to an SCA are insulated if memory prices go even higher.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

I'm not buying shit unless I have to. And then I'll likely buy used.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

“strategic customer agreements”

Quick question: what consumer is agreeing to this?

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I haven't seen the customers named, but Apple finally increasing prices makes me think they're one of them.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 67 points 2 days ago

I wonder if anybody has told Micron about what happens when customers sign a contract but then declare bankruptcy shortly after.

[-] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Or what happens to the stock price once the temporary surge in demand fades or new companies enter the market and disrupt it.

[-] qaeta@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's the point of the agreement. It locks in that demand by contractually requiring the companies agreeing to it to buy a certain amount of product regardless of whether they actually want it.

Personally, I view this as a sign that Micron believes the AI bubble is going to burst within 5 years, so they're locking people in at bubble prices now.

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 2 points 1 day ago

Likely they're just trying to hoard all of the compute in the US despite not producing many of the components, to try to create a substantive gap on AI. DARPA is not used to just being 6 months ahead. But eventually, something's got to give. If nothing else, China is catching up on chip making.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 52 points 2 days ago

Software developers: more Electron and bloated frameworks are what the people want! Running 10 independent browser instances for simple chat apps is a great idea!

[-] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I never understood the scale of this bullshit until I had a user request his script packaged. Now, Intune doesn't like executing random python scripts, so I gave him several options for 8 KB, 50-lines-of-code script.

He disregarded them and wrapped it all in Electron.

I received a 380 MB zip file.

But, well, it had an .exe inside so I could work with that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 58 points 2 days ago

"Locks in"...if all of a sudden there was no demand you can be assured they would "lock out". Micron likes to put the boot to the throat when they have an advantage. Not someone I'd do business with.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hactar42@lemmy.ml 207 points 2 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

Isn't that called price fixing, and is generally illegal?

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is just like selling / buying options in any other industry, e.g farming to buy something at a specified price in the future.

They've agreed to buy XYZ product at 123 time at a price between $100 and $200.

If prices plummet, they've still agreed to buy it at $100 (similar to selling an options $100 Strike PUT), but if prices skyrocket, they don't need to pay more than $200 (similar to buying an options $200 Strike CALL)

Anything in between is just the price, so if it's $150 then its just $150

It's not exactly the same as using options, but the rough idea.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I've never signed a contract to buy something 5 years from now at a certain price.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

You're not a company dealing with massive inventories :P

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's a real thing.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago
[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Agreed, it's obviously not related to that concept. Confusing suggestion.

[-] brendansimms@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

its price fixing if the agreement is among 'competitors' - this is price fixing for a customer(s)

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 11 points 2 days ago

Only if regulatory bodies do something about it.

Unfortunately yes, but the current government is not going to enforce the laws

[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wouldn’t this just be selling security?

You would enter the SCA if you want to secure your supply chain against the risk of inflated pricing. The risk would now be overspending if the market drops. Comparing the two risk profiles, an organization might decide that they have more stomach for overpaying a set amount over 5 years. As opposed, of course, to the risk of paying an arbitrarily expensive amount indefinitely as the market remains volatile.

So now, while planning out the next 5 years of business objectives, you can plan against a much more solid best/worst case scenario. That minimized uncertainty, which lets the business keep moving even if at a more expense pace.

[-] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago

Yes, but the fine is far lower than their profits here... so, it's only illegal if you can't afford it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago

If there’s some collusion, sure, but you’d have to find a government body with the will and teeth to prosecute.

Nothing really against charging whatever you feel like outside of things like certain supplies during disasters. It’s shitty

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 238 points 3 days ago

Hopefully Chinese firms recognize the gap in the market and increase their capacity.

[-] nuko147@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Hopefully the bubble bursts next year, and we all eat popcorn watching Micron's revenue.

[-] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago

They are scaling up but as with other things they will most likely scale to their inner market first, and then I doubt they'll subsidize a price depreciation to help westerners when they can get the profits for themselves

load more comments (54 replies)
[-] Asafum@lemmy.world 102 points 2 days ago

gross margin for Micron

Gross indeed. Fucking greedy scumbags

[-] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 100 points 3 days ago

Remember they are traitors to actual customers when the bubble burtsts.

They should fail, totally, and vanish from the world.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago

Traitors would mean they were ever on your side. Welcome to capitalism, bud. They've always been on the side of maximum profit, like all other corporations.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 30 points 2 days ago

Padme: “…and then they’ll drop, right?”

[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago

Five years is too long for the buyers. The AI bubble will burst before then and then the market price will drop as the inflated demand disappears, especially if this continues long enough for more production capacity to come online.

They might not have had much of a choice in making the deal, though. Micron has been extracting the absolute maximum they can out of this situation. Make a deal or get nothing. Their clients will remember, though, and flag them as an unreliable supplier. Once this ends—and these always end—they’ll likely have a lower market share and end up having to cut prices.

Micron is optimistic in saying the demand won’t start easing until 2028. A lot of the rest of the technology manufacturing industry is about to grind to a crawl if not a halt because it’s nearly impossible to get components. Some companies are already delaying product launches and I think a lot more are about to this summer as they realize what’s happening. If non-AI businesses start to slow, the whole economy starts to slow, the AI demand will falter and that’s when the bubble bursts. I’m thinking maybe by the end of this year, more likely next year.

When the bubble bursts I’m guessing at least a couple of the companies Micron signed SCAs with will fold and Micron won’t get anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
517 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

85805 readers
4579 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS