top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 235 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Coincidentally, OOP just explained academic publishing to a T.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 138 points 3 months ago (29 children)

    I think this is the story of humanity. It ain't getting better until we massacre the inhumanly rich, eat Thier families while the world watches, and force evil socialism on shared intellectual property

    Follow me for more bad advice

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago (19 children)

    See, here's the thing. Everybody loves to point at the guilitine, and the French Revolution. They love to say "Lets do what they did!"

    Here's the problem. Nobody talks about what came next.

    Because what happened was, you had one group of rich assholes who controlled everything, and treated everybody else like shit. So the French chopped off their heads, and got rid of these rich assholes.

    And what happened next? Well, a lot of infighting, but the end result was instead of having a group of rich assholes controlling everyone, you instead had a different group of not rich assholes controlling everyone, who thengot rich from it. And nothing changed.

    I think, before we go around killing everyone, we need a plan. We need to figure out why humans are so quick to all clump up as one submissive blob, who follows the will of whoever claims to have power.

    Instead of 1 president, or 1 dictator, I think we should instead have a panel of 1 million people. Tens of thousands of people from every state. Anyone can apply, and if need be, your individual county can run sn election if you're not running unopposed.

    This I think would cut down tremendously on corruption in our government. Because a company couldn't just bribe 1 president. They'd need to bribe 1 million people.

    And the comittee would always represent the people, because they ARE the people. Most people would know at least 1 committee member in their neighborhood.

    THEN you can kill all the rich assholes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Wealth cap or bust. No one should ever be able to make 1 billion. I think there should be forced divestments after 1 bil and you're barred from the stock market for 5 years. Plus☝🏻, if you use any money to build anything whether it be a building or a business, said billionaire is not allowed to earn more than a total of 1 million/yr.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    That sounds like a cat and mouse game. You make a rule that person A can't be on the stock market for 5 years. This does two things. First, it causes rich people to find some loophole or exploit.

    And second, it just disincentivizes them from using the stock market at all, in favor of some unregulated form of making money. Like crypto.

    Now you could say "Well then we'll place caps on how much you can trsnsfer crypto over to american currency".

    And now you're in a cat and mouse game. Because now they just need to convert it to some foreign currency. Then convert the foreign currency to American currency.

    See? Cat and mouse.

    See, this idea thread is putting up fences to seperate the corrupt from illicit gains. You build a fence, they bring a ladder. You build a bigger fence, they bring a bigger ladder. You build a wall, they install a window. The incentive is always there to overcome the barrier.

    Instead, we should be finding ways to make bringing a bigger ladder cost more than the gains. Rewrite the whole system so that all people benefit before the greedy have a chance to hoard it all.

    Regulate every system. Regulate every persons finances. If they cheat the system, make them pay twice the gains they got. Then distribute those fines to fund education and poor neighborhoods.

    Suddenly you don't need to worry about how big their ladder is, because the juice isn't worth the squeeze.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 107 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    That is how capitalism works.

    The American Weather Service provided weather updates for free, but a company came along and just started copying what the weather service posted ... then sued the Weather Service for publicly posting the weather because the government is not allowed to provide a service for free that a company can charge for.

    Insanity.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Government issues the business licenses. Seems like someone needs to be reminded who has who by the balls.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 79 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (14 children)

    ...Seriously?

    This guy has no leg to stand on; that's the Mildly Infuriating part.


    EDIT: Am I the only one on Lemmy who discounts the whole post the moment I see a blue checkmark?

    Especially this one. It's so hypocritical it hurts.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I think other people can buy the blue checkmark for you on twitter, though my information may be faulty.

    In any case, just cause he gave money to that ass wipe Elon doesn't mean that his analogy isn't valid, just a little "leopards ate my face" kinda deal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 65 points 3 months ago* (17 children)

    Not to mention those same companies obsessed with AI are the ones who run the search engines. They made finding all those tutorials and other good resources harder. They ruin search results with ads and easily gamed algorithms that they stopped trying to improve. All that made people more willing to let the AI find the answer.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    It all makes sense when you realize that AI isn’t the product, control is.

    When everyone depends on cloud services, especially storage, because they can’t afford hard drives or RAM anymore. Do you think the average normie is going to “stand up for principles of privacy and freedom of computing” or are they gonna say “it is what it is” and buy a tablet with 8GB of RAM and an office suite in the cloud?

    Do you think these companies are above scanning everyone’s stuff to find out who is against them? Who is developing some great new idea? Who dissents the government?

    Do you think these companies are above editing all saved copies of a news article and replacing it with something AI generated that looks real enough to memory hole something? (Copies of things in the cloud are already de-duplicated)

    They don’t want us to be able to point out their flaws anymore. They want us to be submissive to them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago* (9 children)

    I have indeed noticed Google (and Google-based search engines like Startpage) has got worse in the past months. Even DuckDuckGo is better now (which as a long time ddg user is wild)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 63 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (19 children)

    There is a license that says that all derivatives must also be open source.

    But also AI companies don't care about the law, they stole all their data, engage in insider trading, circular trading, and generating all manner of illegal content, they don't give a fuck. And the US government isn't doing anything to hold them accountable, infact the president is getting in on it.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (19 replies)
    [–] 31 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    Welcome to the world of scientific publishing, long before AI. Except authors even have to pay for creating "content", and reviewers are expected to work for free. Yet article access is sold at astronomical prices.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    Hey, remember that time Aaron Swartz used public APIs and perfectly legal aggregation of information to compile scientific journals in a data set outside the paywall. And he was arrested, prosecuted, and threatened with life in prison until he (allegedly) killed himself?

    Then his original and highly lucrative pet project, Reddit, was mutated into a propaganda factory by the Epstein Class, cannibalized by the Investor Class, and gutted for AI slop by the Tech Sector?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Once you understand that AI is limited to the questioner's ability to properly elucidate what they need to know you'll have several more botched concrete stair resurfacings.

    Thanks Gemini, you self-contradicting potato

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I'm just waiting for some RTO'd workers to be told they're being mass laid off, and instead they just beat the manager to death. The irony of it only being possible because they were forced back into the office will be delicious.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    20 years? More like somewhere between 30 to 40 if we count early WWW and the Gopher+Usenet that came before it. The GPL isn't quite that old, but the spirit behind it sure is. If we count early home-computer clubs back in the 70's (like the one that birthed the original Apple) or the ham-radio crowd that came before it, we can push into 50+ year territory, easy.

    I hadn't considered AI being a paywall around the whole WWW but now that you mention it, it kind of looks that way. I've opined elsewhere that social media companies (e.g. Facebook) are building walled-gardens to keep eyeballs and attention-spans locked on their brand of reality. This would just be another avenue of attack in that strategy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The library is still there. Admission is still free.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago*

    the library was run on donations and someone copied all the books and is selling a service that summarizes them on a lot right in front of it. you can still go around and give your donation inside but most people don't and the library is starting to fall apart. also the summaries kind of suck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago

    Only 20 years? My techguyforum screen name is damn near 30 years old at this point. (Don't go there. Site is ruined trash, now. ) I been giving info to help with shit since even before then. Internet has my fingerprints in it since the early 90's.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago

    it’s called a walled garden for a reason.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago* (9 children)

    Finally someone said it. I honestly was wondering why no one was complaining about this... I've worked on some open source myself, licensed it GPL, and never intended for it to be used as training data.

    Doesn't the GPL cover shit like this? There should be mass lawsuits hitting any AI that used open source software and didn't just specifically use BSD projects or something.

    If you train an LLM on GPL code, it should be illegal to sell that LLM and use it commercially without revealing ALL THE SOURCE you used and the source to regenerate that model.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    They are also trying to take away these free resources by pushing laws to make ID identification mandatory to make money off of us.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    And the people charging admission are also hemorrhaging money.

    Weird fucking timeline.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 14 points 3 months ago* (5 children)

    The worst part (maybe the second worst after all the slop poisoning the internet nowadays) is the proof that copyright law is only for us poors.

    I download a copyrighted work and get a strongly worded letter from my ISP, or worse. They download all the copyrighted works; scrape the data from them; and charge for the ability to use said data to make derivative, non-transformative slop; and get fabulously wealthy from it.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 13 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The same people who abuse community resources (bulldoze public green spaces, kill rivers, pollute oceans, despoil lands, toxify the air, extinct animals etc.), do the exact same to information and the sources of it. They take for themselves and give nothing back. They cannot coexist with community or communal anything (which is why they hate community and socialism). They cannot give and will compulsively take. Their lives are why greed is considered a sin, insatiable and cruel, and it was wise to believe so.

    Never share anything of value with the world. Do not allow them to know value exists or they will come for it. Giving freely and openly has empowered those who advantage themselves, by stealing every idea that is shared. They are the enemy, they are the threat, their psychology is a hazard to the community.

    Share only with your communities and close those communities to these thieves. The only solution to private power is community power. We need to build back our communities and abandon everything possible that they control.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 3 months ago*

    Just further enshittification. Companies don’t make new things or new technologies anymore. They just find new ways to rent squat and extract fees. They’ve stolen everyone’s work, manufactured a way to give it to you first without you seeing the author’s material, and told everyone to use this method to access information so they can charge for it.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago*

    welcome to academic publishing, it has gone on for 50 years

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Justice is not only about what is fair, but also about the fear people have of suffering consequences, aka: Pain. Being in jail is painful. It's a tiny room with no hygiene, cockroaches, the toilet is right there in the same room, isolation, unlikable neighbors, years or decades without Internet, a TV or PC...

    The biggest lie the Jeffrey Epstein Class managed to pull off was to convince everyone that causing pain is an "absolute" wrong. It is not. Pain is what forces us to reflect and grow the fuck up to avoid committing the same mistakes. Those fuckers didn't have enough pain in their lives, because they lived it on Easy Mode. They were surrounded by yes-men and serfs constantly glazing them and laughing at their bad jokes. Now we are here.

    We don't do shit to them because we are afraid of the pain the bodyguards, the cops or the law will lay upon us. But it should not be that way. They should be afraid of the people. Right now, they are laughing at us, doing heinous shit on purpose just to test our limit, and in the worst case scenario, normalize it. Young kids are already memeing Epstein, almost treating it like it's no big deal or just a joke, I seriously hope they don't carry that attitude forever, and realize that people like Epstein deserve to have their head opened to the truth as soon as you see them. Their bodyguards, I'd say are the worst people of all. The army, cops, bodyguards; they are people who openly and proudly decided to give their lives for a dude who rapes children and is not paying people what they're truly worth, a livable wage.

    Nothing will get better until the rich fear for their lives.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    Its not weird, but its wrong and should be illegal

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›