you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 65 points 3 months ago* (17 children)

Not to mention those same companies obsessed with AI are the ones who run the search engines. They made finding all those tutorials and other good resources harder. They ruin search results with ads and easily gamed algorithms that they stopped trying to improve. All that made people more willing to let the AI find the answer.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    It all makes sense when you realize that AI isn’t the product, control is.

    When everyone depends on cloud services, especially storage, because they can’t afford hard drives or RAM anymore. Do you think the average normie is going to “stand up for principles of privacy and freedom of computing” or are they gonna say “it is what it is” and buy a tablet with 8GB of RAM and an office suite in the cloud?

    Do you think these companies are above scanning everyone’s stuff to find out who is against them? Who is developing some great new idea? Who dissents the government?

    Do you think these companies are above editing all saved copies of a news article and replacing it with something AI generated that looks real enough to memory hole something? (Copies of things in the cloud are already de-duplicated)

    They don’t want us to be able to point out their flaws anymore. They want us to be submissive to them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    They’ve already broadcast their intentions to push cloud compute for home use. These data centers train AI - but chips are improving rapidly. Amazon and others have already stated they plan to use these for cloud compute services as they become obsolete for bleeding edge AI. Microsoft has a low local resource client to cloud version of Windows they are releasing. They want all compute to be subscription based and it will definitely lack any real privacy protections as long as they can keep corporate capture of congress.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago* (9 children)

    I have indeed noticed Google (and Google-based search engines like Startpage) has got worse in the past months. Even DuckDuckGo is better now (which as a long time ddg user is wild)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Honestly ddg has also gotten worse (as it’s bing in a condom), it’s just that Google has shit itself even harder

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Kagi is a paid service and feels weird to pay for a search engine, but things have felt so much better since I tried them out months ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    I don't know if you use their Assistant, but you can limit it to specific sources. The first option after the entire web is the fediverse. They also have the small web, which just shows you things made by actual humans, not something trying to sell you something.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    I pay for Metager and i do really recommend it. You pay a pittance per search while being free of the crap that infests the net. Kagi comes with it's own set of issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I’ll look into Metager as this is the first I’ve heard of it.

    What set of issues do you see with Kagi? It’s the best I’ve encountered as of late, but if there’s more I should consider; I’d like to learn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I mainly find their CEO problematic, and their focus on AI does not bode well for the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Thank you for sharing. I do now recall a couple of the items you addressed, and I’ll have to keep others in mind.

    We can’t have anything nice… google, digg, Reddit, github, Kagi, proton mail. —at one point in time these were good. The rot or trajectory of rot seems inevitable.

    I’m not anti AI, but it doesn’t need to be in everything all the time. It shouldn’t obfuscate data sources. It shouldn’t be allowed to consume and gather everything breaking laws that would apply to any individual and ought to be enforced for any corporate entity.

    Pointing an AI at a larger company’s documentation or feeding a local one a largish manual and using it to figure out how or why 2, 3, or 4 parts work together has been useful for me in the past. Again where I can then get to the data to learn for myself.

    Letting the pattern recognization machine (AI) assess a logfile or 3 that are intertwined to help find issues has been helpful.

    Injecting it into every internet search where I never asked is wasteful and stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Just wanted to make sure you know that this isn't my blog.

    I agree. Machine learning is something very useful! It's sad that the moment a computer was able to spit out coherent sentences, humanity lost their minds. I specifically have a grudge against Altman and Amodei - the intentionally misleading statements suggestive of this being the way of getting an AGI really did a number on society.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    To be fair, Google has been fighting a war against SEO and spam basically since it was started.

    I don't think they intentionally degraded their search engine. I think they just diverted resources away from fighting spam and SEO and instead dedicated those resources to AI stuff. Intentionally degrading their search results would require work. They'd have to convince their high-paid employees that for some reason they should make the results worse. But, just letting the stuff rot naturally as SEOs kept up their attacks, that's free.

  • source
  • parent