unmask my gemini and nostr BITCHES

a $5 locked 4 hour demo? gfy.

“This was unlike anything our team has ever experienced,” Nick Cocchi, the Hampden county sheriff, said of the incident, which was captured on video released by his office and posted to YouTube by MassLive.

Oh, so let me get this straight: Six months of jail time for weaponizing apian assault on badge-wearing servants of capital, but absolutely zero consequences for the systemic, routine devastation of booting an 80-year-old cancer patient out of his house so some predatory lending vulture can liquidate his assets. The sheriff found the bee incident “unlike anything our team has ever experienced.” Yeah buddy, because you experience housing destruction so fucking regularly it doesn’t even register as anomalous anymore. It’s background radiation at this point. Just another Tuesday enforcing the financial rape of sick people. “We try to help people through difficult situations,” Cocchi said, while literally being the instrument of their most difficult situation. That’s some real I’m very sorry for this but I’m going to do it anyway energy. “We’re compassionate genocidalists” is basically what you’re saying. Rebecca Woods showed up with an actual physical manifestation of “NO” and the state’s response was to break her face into pavement and jail her for six months. But the eviction? Chef’s kiss. Totally cool, totally legal, totally normal. The fact that his statement treats getting swarmed by bees as the shocking aberration rather than, I dunno, the routine judicial destruction of someone’s life is just peak American law enforcement tunnel vision. You know what’s “unprecedented”? Actually giving a shit about the person you’re destroying. Woods failed, the guy lost his home, and everyone’s fine with that. That’s the part that should be “unlike anything we’ve experienced.“​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

FUCK THESE PIGS

FUCK THIS SYSTEM

STING ALL THE FUCKING PIGS

GUY RESCHENTHALER (R-PA-14)

Pro-Israel Funding

Rep. Reschenthaler has collected over $170,000 from AIPAC and the Israel lobby . More specifically:

• AIPAC PAC alone has given him $188,120 in the 2023-2024 election cycle  • That represents 37.8% of his entire campaign contributions ($188,120 out of $497,733 total raised) • Career total: $170,000+ from pro-Israel ## Voting Record • He was among Republican legislators who participated in the failed post-2020 coup attempt and joined a case calling for all votes in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to be discarded  • Votes consistently pro-Israel on defense funding and Middle East policy • No record of voting against Israeli military aid packages

IC Sanctions Vote

He supported sanctions against the International Criminal Court for holding Netanyahu accountable for his war crimes  — basically voting to shield Israeli leadership from accountability.

MAX MILLER (R-OH-7)

Pro-Israel Funding

Rep. Max Miller has received nearly $200,000 from AIPAC and their allies . Breaking it down:

• AIPAC’s PAC spent $27,500 on Miller from March 20 to Dec. 31, 2023  • Career total: ~$200,000+ from pro-Israel PACs and aligned donors • One of only two Jewish Republicans in Congress (the other being David Kustoff)

Voting Record & Rhetoric

This is where it gets spicy:

• After October 7, 2023, Miller criticized Rashida Tlaib and said about Gaza: “I don’t even want to call it the Palestinian flag because they’re not a state, they’re a territory, that’s about to probably get eviscerated and go away here shortly, as we’re going to turn that into a parking lot”  • Miller stated there should be no “rules of engagement” in the Israeli assault on Gaza  — basically advocating for unlimited military action with zero humanitarian constraints • In January 2024, Miller was appointed to the Commission on Reform and Modernization of the Department of State  — right after taking max pro-Israel money • In June 2025, Miller reported an antisemitic threat from a road rage incident and had fabricated much of his accusations, as later evidenced by highway surveillance footage  — played the victim card to shore up his pro-Israel credentials

THE OVERALL PICTURE: Follow The Money Combined Israel Lobby Funding: • Reschenthaler: $170,000+ • Miller: $200,000+ • Total: ~$370,000+ from pro-Israel sources across their careers

For context: In the 2023-2024 congressional cycle, pro-Israel PACs and affiliated donors spent more than $37 million to bolster elected allies. That sum comprises $24 million distributed to 356 members of the House of Representatives and $7.6 million to 40 senators . AIPAC alone supported 361 pro-Israel Democratic and Republican candidates in 2024 with more than $53 million in direct support .

What the data shows: • Reschenthaler: 37.8% of his fundraising in the 2024 cycle came from AIPAC alone • Miller: Nearly $200K in career funding from the Israel lobby (~massive chunk of his overall war chest for a freshman rep) • Both are co-sponsors of HR 8445, extending US military benefits to Americans fighting for the Israeli military

The Verdict: “Bought and Paid For”? Yeah, these guys are extremely financially aligned with AIPAC and pro-Israel interests. When Track AIPAC literally says “He is paid to work for the Israel lobby” , that’s not hyperbole—it’s describing a documented flow of campaign money directly tied to voting patterns. Both reps are actively: 1. Accepting massive donations from pro-Israel PACs 2. Co-sponsoring legislation that extends US benefits to IDF soldiers (HR 8445) 3. Voting consistently to shield Israel from international accountability (ICC sanctions) 4. Making hardline pro-Israel statements that align with their donors’ interests This is textbook quid pro quo: money flows in → votes/rhetoric flow out. Whether that’s legal or not, it’s the way American campaign finance works.

fucking domestic agents of a foreign national.

traitors​​​​​.

• Guy Reschenthaler — Pennsylvania (PA-14) — Republican (Primary Sponsor)

• Max L. Miller — Ohio (OH-7) — Republican (Co-sponsor, original)

2 traitors put names on this.

piss drinking worthless human.

YOU ARE LITERALLY WORTHLESS

rapist cunt. diaf

so.. there's hope..

🎯

always has been.gif

Mangione did nothing wrong.

Well guys... It's endorsed by the CEO.

so there's that

context:

1. The Initial Promise

When Ken Martin took over as DNC Chair in early 2025, he publicly committed to a transparent, deep-dive review of what went wrong in the 2024 cycle. The goal was to interview hundreds of staffers, volunteers, and voters across all 50 states to understand why the party lost ground with key demographics—specifically Latino voters, young people, and the working class.

2. The Reversal

In December 2025, Martin announced that the DNC would not be releasing the completed report to the public or the party’s rank-and-file. This move was a direct reversal of his earlier pledge of transparency. The DNC’s official rationale for the "mothballing" of the report was summed up in a now-widely quoted statement from Martin:

"Here’s our North Star: does this help us win? If the answer is no, it’s a distraction from the core mission."

3. The Controversy

The decision sparked significant backlash from grassroots organizers and party activists for several reasons:

• Lack of Accountability: Critics argue that without a public accounting of errors, the party is destined to repeat them in the 2026 midterms.
• The "Gaza Factor": Reports and leaks suggested the autopsy found that the administration’s policy toward the conflict in Gaza and the high cost of living were major factors in voter alienation. Some believe the report was suppressed to avoid public "finger-pointing" on these sensitive issues.
• Elitism vs. Grassroots: Many donors and volunteers felt that withholding the data they helped provide (through interviews and feedback) suggested the party leadership viewed the base on a "need-to-know" basis.

4. Current Status

As of early 2026, the report remains under seal. While Martin maintains that the party is "putting the learnings into motion" privately, the lack of a public document has left a vacuum that is currently being filled by third-party autopsies (such as those from RootsAction) and internal leaks, keeping the debate over the 2024 loss alive despite the DNC's attempts to move on.