144

It would be hilarious if it wasn't wasting 14.2 million dollars on a no bid contract that we all knew was going to fail since it was, just like everything Trump, surface level.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 hours ago

Bleach is a cure-all. Algae, COVID, Worm brain, hand stain, sleepy meeting syndrome, etc. It’s really Windex 2.0

/s

[-] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 1 points 26 minutes ago

I'm curious if massive amount of bleach will fade the flag paint job of the wading pool?

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 47 points 3 hours ago

I appreciate the fact they didn’t measure how much they need, they just went to the pool store and bought a bunch of residential sized containers.

[-] adarza@piefed.ca 25 points 2 hours ago

well, they fired anyone that would have given a damn, or would know the chemistry and calculations. so what they gonna do? it's not like this administration knows how to choose or hire knowledgeable, experienced, competent, and qualified persons. why didn't they just hire another 'pool boy' to 'fix' it at a cost of $50 million for the 'rush' job? (less, of course, whatever gets kicked back under the potty chair).

[-] YellowParenti@lemmy.wtf 3 points 59 minutes ago

I could have done the job for a measly $9m. The problem is getting the rarer american anniversary chlorine, but I'll eat the cost. Like I said, I'll do it for the low low price of $20m.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

...and then charged the Federal government another $100k.

[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 2 points 39 minutes ago

.. and placed a stunningly accurate bet on Polymarket about the size of the contract

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago

What's another couple of thousands on retail products when you've already wasted 14.2 million.

[-] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago

Ridiculous. The Reflecting Pool is about 10x the volume of an Olympic swimming pool. Quick math tells me they need >1000 gallons to have any sort of effect.

They put in... maybe 8 gallons?

[-] scutiger@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

They had several cases of peroxide, definitely more than 8 gallons, but it was only like 12% so pretty weak stuff anyway. Nowhere near what they would have needed to clear it all up. Plus it would have been super temporary and would have ended up oxygenating the water and feeding the algae.

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

This administration really embodies the "good enough for government work" ethos.

[-] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 1 points 30 minutes ago

Not really. I guess they may have lowered the bar for that phrase, though.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

You'd think for 14 million they could at least have a couple of those little floating pool filters.

But, in reality, a massive body of water like that is just gonna have natural things happen to it. There isn't really a way around it unless they want to poison the local environment with chemicals.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

Besides the concrete cracks, the Reflecting Pool needed new pipes to the filtration and distribution building (the wrong ones were installed and ground settling cracked them, they’re leeching water into the soil). They also needed to waterproof the expansion joints which, although temporary sealed by the liner they installed, will eventually leak again when the liner rips due to further settlement.

Once again, Trump puts lipstick on a pig and kicks the problem down the road so he can look good until he’s gone.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

100% certain they do not care.

[-] velma@sh.itjust.works 34 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I could have sworn there were articles circulating this morning that they were pouring hydrogen peroxide in there? Now bleach?

...that sounds like a bad idea, but I'm no pool expert.

[-] Godort@lemmy.ca 37 points 4 hours ago

They're talking about the same thing. The term "Bleach" is ambiguous and mostly describes a result rather than a specific chemical. It could be talking about sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, or sodium percarbonate (or any number of other chemicals that make things white)

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago

The term “Bleach” is ambiguous and mostly describes a result rather than a specific chemical.

Sure, when used a verb...

When someone "bleached their hair" they used hydrogen peroxide, because that would achieve a bleaching effect

However the headline uses it as noun "dumps bleach in pool". And I'm pretty sure that's not correct.

The article says hydrogen peroxide, but headlines are often written by someone else and I think that's where the confusion came from.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yeah. I was gonna say. When I buy "bleach" (literally says it in the bottle) it's sodium hypochlorite diluted in water. But I'd never want to burn my scalp with it trying "bleach" my hair.

[-] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 19 points 3 hours ago

This article specifies the use of both 12% hydrogen peroxide and calcium hypochlorite powder. Hope they turned off the ozone generator too.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

It would be hilarious, ironically, if they ended up making chlorine gas because they just poured in whatever they thought would fix it.

[-] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago

I mean, when chlorine hypochlorite oxidizes organic material, you will make some chorine gas. However, unless they used an absolute shit ton it wouldn't matter much outside.

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I doubt they are measuring it well…wouldn’t surprise me

[-] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago

Hey thanks! That makes sense

[-] SwifferWetjet 9 points 3 hours ago

You told people to mix bleach and ammonia, Peggy?!

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Why not both

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

its somewhat appropriate that theres a cum-like stench over all of washington dc now. Wonder if thats going to have to be permanent.

[-] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago
[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Wouldn’t a small fleet of pool sand filters have a better outcome here?

[-] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Crushed glass is a very good filter media.

[-] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 9 points 3 hours ago

I’m open to putting lava in there for a spicy pond.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

LuxSpark makes some good points. Lets make him our president. No, I am not kidding. He's the best candidate we have at the moment and you all know it.

[-] SwifferWetjet 13 points 3 hours ago

You already know they're gonna dump a water bucket on it and make a nether portal the second you let them do that shit dude🙄

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
144 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30101 readers
2607 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS