Totally normal question to ask, regular poll choices
"yes - only child prostitute"
For ethical reasons 
b
as opposed to a child prostitute who has siblings
Should move to Argentina, heard they're abolishing the age of consent.
I'm really hoping this is just some very dark humor
Never bet against hell world.
They're reducing the election of a free market extremist in Argentina into "haha libertarians are pedos" jokes.
Indeed, the people most likely to be welcoming to them are market radicals and if your worldview revolves around "everything must be allowed", then legalizing that is likely to happen.
When I was in grad school, my advisor used to respond to any question that began "Imagine a possible world where.." by just stopping the questioner and saying *no, I'd rather not."
Imagine a world where you didn't have to listen to these stupid questions
Imagine the american president is 100 years old and dying of dementia. His last wish is one more genocide. Is it ethical for the Zionist Entity to do one?
if i ever hear someone say the phrase "free speech" again I'm dunking their head in the toilet
sneerclub had a moratorium on threads about her because she posts like this with fulltime dedication
Too unsubtle about what the rest of the "grey tribe" wants.
I regret googling that. Thank you.
RonPaulf the Grey
The infinite potential of the human mind and these fools are trying so hard to find justifiable ways to engage in csa.
The fantastical Singularity(tm) of eternal life and godlike superpowers must maintain 1950s 
aesthetics, including the normalization of hurting children.
What if the world was made of chocolate pudding
What if the pudding consents though
LSD and garden gnomes; not even once
Hypotheticals were a mistake.
:internet-delenda-est:
Suppose-
No.
Get a capital-R "Rationalist" talking long enough and they will eventually talk about any conceivable scenario where they think it might be okay to harm children. 
A look into the mind of a libertarian.
Imagining the Make A Wish employee tasked with arranging this
The stress of having to find a new guy because the last one killed himself in prison must be immense
I don't even know what the worst option is...
There’s a hidden assumption that they’re properly orderable. They are clearly non-transitive.
That implies that we could use these options as an extremely cursed alternative to Rock Paper Scissors.
Isn't this literally the plot of a curb your enthusiasm episode
Stop posting Aella this is her whole thing
ecks more like yucks
Yudcks.
Argentinian congressional debates be like
How does one even come to formulate this kind of question? The 2nd choice is basically an answer, nvm.
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again