242
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago
NUCLEAR CONSENT SETTINGS
- YES
- NO
- MAYBE
- CAN YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION?
[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 11 hours ago

"Oops, bumped it with my knee again!"

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

You’d be shocked at how many times we’ve almost seen a nuclear apocalypse for this exact reason.

The end is far more likely to come from a whoopsie daisy than an intentional decision.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 hours ago

If I wasn't feeling lazy I would post the lyrics to 99 Luftballoons

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Who’s got two thumbs and has your back?

This guy! (you can’t see it, but I’m using both thumbs to point at myself. I’m really doing it. As I type this. Don’t doubt me.)

Hast du etwas Zeit für mich 
Dann singe ich ein Lied für dich 
Von 99 Luftballons 
Auf ihrem Weg zum Horizont 
Denkst du vielleicht grad' an mich 
Dann singe ich ein Lied für dich 
Von 99 Luftballons 
Und dass sowas von sowas kommt

99 Luftballons 
Auf ihrem Weg zum Horizont 
Hielt man für Ufo's aus dem All 
Drum schickte ein General 
'Ne Fliegerstaffel hinterher, 
Alarm zu geben, wenn's so wär' 
Dabei war'n dort am Horizont 
Nur 99 Luftballons.

99 Düsenflieger 
Jeder war ein großer Krieger 
Hielten sich für Captain Kirk 
Es gab ein großes Feuerwerk 
Die Nachbarn haben nichts gerafft 
Und fühlten sich gleich angemacht 
Dabei schoss man am Horizont 
Auf 99 Luftballons

99 Kriegsminister 
Streichholz und Benzinkanister 
Hielten sich für schlaue Leute 
Witterten schon fette Beute 
Riefen Krieg und wollten Macht 
Mann, wer hätte das gedacht 
Dass es einmal soweit kommt 
Wegen 99 Luftballons 
Wegen 99 Luftballons 
99 Luftballons

99 Jahre Krieg 
Ließen keinen Platz für Sieger 
Kriegsminister gibt's nicht mehr 
Und auch keine Düsenflieger 
Heute zieh' ich meine Runden 
Seh' die Welt in Trümmern liegen 
Hab' 'nen Luftballon gefunden 
Denk' an euch und lass' ihn fliegen

If you want it en ingles then find a site that doesn’t make it a bitch to copy and paste. It’s about a world civilization ending war because people in love let loose a bunch of balloons. 99 to be exact. We’ve been 30 minutes away from white hot civilizational atonement ever since nuclear armistice became a concept.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Dammit, Horndog Tango, that's how we lost Belgium!

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

Damn. I really liked their waffles...

[-] nednobbins@lemmy.zip 24 points 16 hours ago

I love the implied message in various switches.

Your average wall switch is about convenience. It says that it's ready to go on or off with reasonable effort.

The "emergency stop" switch is designed to be as easy as possible to hit. If you're barely hanging on to consciousness, are missing your hands, and have only a vague notion that you really need to push that button, you can smash it with any available body part and it will switch.

The nuke switch is the opposite. It says that you really really really better be sure before you flick this switch. If you aren't alert enough to solve a bit of a puzzle, the switch stays off.

[-] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 14 hours ago

Good to know that one of the high-tech speed bumps between us and atomic obliteration is an inconveniently positioned ½" steel tab with a warning that says "you really probably shouldn't" 🤣

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

We should put a piece of tape on the switch too. That'll really get the point across

[-] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

But not just any tape! This 3x1" hyper-engineered marvel has been rigorously tested, exhaustively reviewed, signed off by a slew of brass, lost in a logistics chokepoint, found again, shipped faster-than-thought to a facility that's nearly spelled the same but on the wrong continent... So, this tape? This is what we pulled off the battery hatch for the coffee room's boombox while we wait for the certified piece.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Looks like we just found our new marketing executive for HEMtape boys! Tell us more about this tape's military applications.

[-] nednobbins@lemmy.zip 13 points 11 hours ago

"one of" is doing some heavy lifting there :)

That button isn't meant to stop crazy or evil people from killing us all. That's (hopefully) taken care of by things like careful pilot vetting.

A completely sane and non-mass-murderous pilot might still accidentally press a normal button. Especially if they were tired near the end of a long mission.

It's not as stringent as the safeguard that Roger Fisher proposed. He suggested that the nuclear launch codes be placed in a capsule and surgically implanted near the heart of a volunteer. That volunteer would follow the president around with a butcher knife. If the president ever wanted to launch the nukes it would need to be serious enough that he was willing to take that knife and carve the launch codes out of the chest of an innocent man.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I like the Homer approach. I want three different nuclear launch codes! One here, here, and here. You can never remember the nuclear launch code when you're angry.

[-] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

Three different fastener heads within like two inches.

Government efficiency at its best

[-] BranBucket@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

High torque on the side holds one of the cockpit fairings and isn't involved with the switch. Flathead fasteners are trapped screws and part of a different module that can be removed independently of the switch. Only the phillips is part of the switch assembly.

The vast majority of screws are high-torque, while a few odd bits and bobs are different types for one reason or another. It's not as bad as you'd expect.

[-] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Not a Phillips, that's a Pozidriv.

And Torq-Set might be higher torque, but it still sucks. The heads strip and bits cam out just like Phillips. If anything, they use it because it's easier to take out because the offset gives it more torque in removal.

I'm guessing the slotted screws are there to discourage a 200 lb gorilla from trying to use an impact driver.

Just use Torx, for the love of science. I'll allow Robertson but only for wood screws.

[-] BranBucket@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

It may be a pozidriv, but I guarantee you the vast majority are being removed and installed with a #2 phillips driver, chalk it up to government efficiency again, lol. However, as egregious of a fastener sin as this is, to my knowledge it has yet to cause a catastrophic incident or frequent work stoppages.

The slotteds are maybe a step up from a thumb screw, not much torque at all on those, If you have to use an impact driver someone fucked up intentionally in such a way that it would almost constitute deliberate sabotage. They're recessed below the panel so you need a little something for purchase, hence the slot. They're also integral to the component, so no chance of FOD with those.

It's a 50 year old airframe, torx was still relatively new around the same time it was first being drawn up. Torq-set has been around since the late 50's or early 60's IIRC and is a proven NASM standard. They went with what they knew worked in an aviation application, and it gets the job done well enough. And, as I was pointing out in my last comment, it's typically one kind of fastener per job, unless its a fairly big job. So the work flows fairly smoothly considering the age of the aircraft and number of subcontractors involved.

[-] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 6 points 12 hours ago

Imagine if there was an accidental nuclear strike because the government refused to spring for $0.01 worth of panel fasteners and the industry standard will-only-fail-once-every-million-years arrangement hit that one-in-a-million situation.

Penny-wise and pound-foolish.

[-] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I'm not thinking of upfront cost, I'm thinking about the engineer that needs to constantly change drivers to access something. Huge pain in the ass, plus a higher chance of FOD.

What needs to be done to move/remove the red guard piece so that the switch can be used? Is it something the pilot can just do quickly, does it require a special tool, etc.?

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

It flips to the side, freeing the switch to move up and down.

[-] mastod0n@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Releases two dozen power bottoms.

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

So, where does one find this button?

Asking for a friend.

[-] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 54 points 1 day ago

"Nuclear Consent" would make a helluva band name.

[-] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 15 hours ago

What's their music sound like?

[-] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 9 points 12 hours ago

Geiger counters and regret

[-] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Remorse* 😅

[-] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

Whatever the opposite of this is.

[-] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

REL ONLY

"Enjoy your 350kg of radioactive scrap, fuckers!"

[-] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago

Gives them a way to jettison the bomb in an emergency, like before a forced landing or crash. A flaming pile of wrecked airplane is bad enough without a nuke also being on fire

[-] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 67 points 1 day ago

... isn't there someone you forgot to ask?

Judgmental F-16 watches

[-] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 23 hours ago

Since when do they put nuclear warheads on F-16?

Or is it just the button to say "You are allowed to nuke my position if it is necessary for the mission"

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

That second one absolutely does not require your consent

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 47 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

F-16s were certified to carry B-61 nuclear bombs in October 1980, the same time they were certified as combat operational with the USAF.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 20 points 22 hours ago

In GI-JOE, they had lasers and everyone had a parachute.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I had a very smug "ACKSHULLY" all lined up about how the Joes only flew F-14 and X-29 derivatives, but nope. Late in the run, they got an adorable little mini F-16.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 16 hours ago

Oh that one they had in the 80s with the wings that would fold back, that was an F14? I always thought it was an F16, but I don’t know shit about planes other than some flight sims I played decades ago.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Folding wings is practically the trademark of the F-14 Tomcat. I understand why we stopped making planes that do that, but I thought the folding wings was the coolest shit as a kid.

[-] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Right up there with suicide doors and the bench-seat as trunk-space "upgrade". 🤣

As a kid, I was super interested in entering/exiting vehicles being dramatically faster, and spent years watching every trip go by via rearview w/ the fam noise in the back of my mind. ☝🏼

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Also (correct me where I’m wrong) I thought the F16 seated two, a pilot and a weapons officer, while the f14 only had the pilot? And I thought the GI Joe toy sat two. Of course the folding wing would be the much more obvious identifier, given it’s a toy and a replica where they probably took a lot of license, and this isn’t that tank wars forum where everyone is posting military secret schematics for akshually points.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

F 14 is also a 2 pilot plane, there may have been some single seaters, but the default had 2 pilots.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

LOL, I had my "JETS ARE COOL!" phase when the F-1n fighters were the only active ones, so yeah. The swing-wing one from Top Gun is an F-14. F-16's (provided by the Israeli Air Force, so... yay?) were featured in the, ahem, somewhat less well regarded Louis Gossett Jr. vehicle Iron Eagle.

[-] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Hey, you leave ol' Iron Eagle outta this. That was the best fuckyeah-milprop winter blockbuster that '86 had offer. Besides, at least LG Jr isn't a gawdamn sociopathic cultist. 😅 I think.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
242 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPhotos

1508 readers
869 users here now

HistoryPhotos is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  4. No genocide or atrocity denialism.
  5. Photos MUST be at LEAST 10 years old, and ideally over 20. We appreciate that we are living through events which will become history, but this is ultimately not a comm for news or current affairs, but events which have occurred some time in the past.

Related Communities:

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS