Congestion pricing should be introduced in all major cities.
When it comes to mobility transition, Berlin is the one and only city moving in the wrong direction, compared to the rest of germany. I do understand that the NYT correspondent is located in Berlin, but the perspective they give is misleading. There is (quite often a bipartisan) suport for mobility transition at the municipal level. The main hurdle remains the federal government, ministry of transportation and the federal laws.
No discredit to the NYT overall, but purely on covering the things happening in Berlin I would say consider they aren't the best medium to cover this / the best source to inform this particular community. Would have really liked it if they would've related this to the culture-war they have at home. I mean the way the left and the right each have taken their side of the electorate hostage preventing the formation of a middle-ground isn't dissimilar to that in other polarized discussions.
Did you cut off half the article or does it not actually mention any of the anti-car candidates? It's not a fight if there's only pro-car candidates. Also, it's worth mentioning that the SPD is generally also a pro-car party. If in doubt, look at Hannover, the local SPD broke off a red-green coalition because the green mayor wants to build more bicycle lanes.
There are no "anti-car candidates", there are only candidates that consider intrests of car mobility not the only interests worth to consider.
Berlin is the city in Germany with arguably the best public transport network. It is very easy to get from one point to another by train. At the same time it‘s the city with the widest avenues, making cars a not so problematic option as well. It least compared to all other cities in Germany.
This is kind of a non-issue and blown out of proportions I would say.
the widest avenues, making cars a not so problematic
Id argue that, at the very least, those avenues being wide is itself problematic
The pro-car signs of parties were not related to the election in autumn but to a popular petition, "Berlin car-free", that had until May to gather enough signatures for that question to be piggybacked to the election in autumn.
They failed to do so, so there won't be referendum on this matter.
Yeah, they only got to around 130k signatures and needed about 170k to make the ballot.
This was after years of legal fights where the major parties backed everything, including poster campaigns against the signature gathering effort itself, to halt the citizens referendum. Eventually the courts had to rule the referendum constitutional.
It's insane how hard the mainline parties fight making cities better for people. It's all for the rich to be richer.
I'm not a fan of AfD, but i have to say them putting up signs "no car is illegal" is ballsy though.
Europe
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)



