250
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Visstix@lemmy.world 112 points 3 weeks ago

Half the size of a pickup truck? So like, a normal car?

[-] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 64 points 3 weeks ago

More like 1/3 the size of a zambonie. Or 11/3 the size of two penguins on a foosball table.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Whats that in Rhode Islands? And how about mass, can I get that measured in bigmacs?

[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 6 points 3 weeks ago

129 / 4.307213e+10 = 2.9949761 x 10^-9

That's in sq ft. Rounded. Length x width of a pickup truck divided by surface area of Rhode Island as reported on Wikipedia

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

How many dachshunds is that?

[-] galacticworm@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] j_elgato@leminal.space 104 points 3 weeks ago

Oh thank God... We almost had to use the metric system there didn't we?

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

We were within a hair's breadth of that awful fate.

[-] technohacker@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago

within a hair's breadth

squints eyes

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Are all imperial hair bigger, or only Texas ones?

[-] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

We almost had to mention standard cars, which are also half the size.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Americans don't drive cars, so they don't know how big they might be.

[-] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

A car?? Is that some kind of libural version of my furd f300000 king ranch pedestrian killer edition truck?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 67 points 3 weeks ago

Is the measure in Imperial pick ups,

or metric pick ups?

[-] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago

Cochem mentioned! 😍

[-] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yep, they are in Low Earth Orbit. A place that has a very, very small amount of air, so the satellites experience drag, lose speed, eventually the propellant tanks run dry, and they burn up in the atmosphere. The ISS experiences the same thing, which is why its altitude slowly falls, then you see a sharp increase as they push to a slightly higher orbit.

At the altitude the SpaceX satellites are at, they only passively stay up for a few years. With the onboard propulsion giving them each another few years.

[-] finalarbiter@piefed.social 40 points 3 weeks ago
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 3 weeks ago

Large boulder is a state of mind. It achieved an awful lot that day and was feeling especially pleased with itself thus the honorific.

[-] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago

Please let one land on my house so I can sue SpaceX and retire early.

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

One fell in a farmer's field in Saskatchewan. Dude got a hassle, some publicity, and a nominal fee of a grand or something.

edit: here's a mastodon thread where astronomer Sam Lawler lives nearby and visits the site with media:

SpaceX wreckage in Saskatchewan

[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 8 points 3 weeks ago

It wasn't from a starlink satellite though.

which the U.S. aerospace company SpaceX later admitted was part of a cargo trunk for its Crew Dragon spacecraft.

Source

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Cool thanks!

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

A grand? Then I'm keeping it. I can make more as a roadside tourist attraction. Or maybe I sell it to the Chinese or Bezos or something. You want your toy back, Musk? Pay up, you cheap bastard!

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 3 weeks ago

I don't remember that happening. I would actually be surprised if a satellite would survive reentry with basically anything left of it. If you want to return something from orbit you need heat shield or you're not getting it back.

Even the ISS is expected to completely burn up and that's much higher mass than a starlink satellite

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

"act of God", legalese for "fuck you".

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 17 points 3 weeks ago

Donnie Darko but it's Musk's space junk instead of a jet engine.

[-] green_goglin 3 points 3 weeks ago

Welp, it’s been fun. Time to IPO and unload all the liabilities onto the public.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Complaining about Kressler Syndrome

Complaining about Starlink

Pick one, asshole. As shitty as Musk is, Starlink is in too low of an orbit to cause Kressler Syndrome

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Every time somebody mentions Kessler syndrome they always seem to forget that low earth orbit is an area literally bigger than the earth's surface. There's about 10,000 of them and they are spread out over an area bigger than the surface of the earth. Meanwhile there are way more than 10,000 trucks in the world and apparently they are twice the size, and yet there are huge swaths of land that do not currently have a truck on them. I think we'll be okay.

Although I do accept they are probably irritating for astronomers.

[-] Rossphorus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Collisions aren't theoretical, near misses are so common that there's an entire department at NASA dedicated to detecting them and warning satellite owners to adjust course, I know because we were contacted about a possible collision involving our cubesat. Prior to megaconstellations being deployed if humanity stopped adjusting satellite orbits there would be a collision within a month, now there would be a collision within 5 days. It's only a matter of time until both satellites on a collision course don't have the ability to adjust course (engine failure or no propulsion/fuel/comms). In the event of a Carrington-style solar flare there's a good chance a decent percentage of satellites would be knocked out, making this hypothetical into a reality. Further, we can only currently track objects down to about 10cm, but NASA estimates suggest about 500,000 objects exist between 1-10cm in size in LEO.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] nightlily@leminal.space 15 points 3 weeks ago
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

DDG/Lucille Bluth says about 40,000-50,000 bananas.

[-] badhops@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

always $ in the banana stand

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago

Half the size of a pickup truck… a Mazda compact, or a jacked up GMC Hemi half ton?

Even just saying Ford F150 gives a lot of leeway.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They're about the size of a large flat screen TV. I have no idea why they reached the pickup trucks, they might have the width but they're only a couple of inches thick. A flat screen is a much better analogy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] harmbugler@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago

Where I live, we have pickup trucks half the size of pickup trucks.

[-] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 10 points 3 weeks ago

Is this not part of the plan. I seem to recall they are designed to entirely burn up on reentry.

[-] Tai@mander.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah this is by design. Beats the alternative of having every starlink satellite ever launched hanging around low Earth orbit long after it stops working.

[-] Hayduke@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

There could be cubes the size of gorillas.

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah that's what happens to absolutely everything in Low Earth Orbit in just a few years. Well, unless you keep pushing them back up like we do to the International Space Station.

These satellites are doing exactly what they're intended to do. These are actually pretty small satellites overall, there are a lot up there quite a bit larger that deorbit and burn up on re-entry just fine as well.

That's part of the reason things are sent to LEO specifically, because their orbits naturally degrade and they naturally deorbit themselves without needing any assistance or fuel. It also means if a satellite in LEO fails quicker than planned, is put in an incorrect orbit due to a launch issue, or just failed prematurely, it will fail-safe and deorbit without any assistance.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

return to sender

preferably on his head

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

That would be so hilarious. People would be drinking beer and laughing at the story 100 years later.

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Privatizing space sure did make things more efficient, puh-raise JEE-zuz-ah!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
250 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

84733 readers
3638 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS