345

As the title.

Should there be a new rule added where intentional removal of credits and watermarks from other peoples works be deleted?

Only thing i can think against it is if the original artist isn't known. Usually someone in the comments finds it though

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 3 days ago

Yes, absolutely.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 112 points 4 days ago
[-] Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org 83 points 4 days ago

and OP didn't credit it 👀

[-] abominable_panda@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Ha I hadnt even noticed! I saw so many uncredited posts recently I didnt think it was already discussed. Obviously didn't bother searching either. My mistake xD

Tbf I didnt even post this for credit. I just wanted to kickstart a discussion but looks like its already got traction on the other post so im happy

[-] notabot@piefed.social 20 points 3 days ago

This has got to be peak irony.

[-] TheV2@programming.dev 8 points 3 days ago

Yikes! I caught myself making the assumption that this was an "official" mod's post in response to the existing discussion...

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

From what I understand there's only one mod here, and they have been MIA for awhile. It's unlikely we are going to see an official mod response.

[-] arin@lemmy.world 68 points 3 days ago

Imo anyone caught removing credits should get banned

[-] viral.vegabond@piefed.social 34 points 4 days ago

Yes, absolutely.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I have strong opinions on the matter

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 4 days ago

Yes. Unfortunately, proving intentionality in smaller cases than beep may be difficult. But it's useful as something to lean back on when it's obvious/egregious like their case.

First step would be enforcing the existing rules lime two posts per day per user, imo.

[-] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Just say that if it doesn’t have a watermark the poster has to provide a link to the original.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago

That's perfectly logical, and I agree entirely.

The issue lies in the problem user OP is trying to address with this rule. Beep has stated that they won't consistently attribute sources until the community implements the rule they want enforcing that users strip attribution out of the image itself: https://lemmus.org/comment/17161116

Hooray dumb internet drama!

[-] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 16 points 4 days ago

I think that deliberately removing credits should be against the rules but if they try to link back to the artist to give attribution in the event that the comic has already had attribution removed I would be okay with that so long as the rest of the work is intact. The individual who's been shown to be using AI to remove watermarks and artist signatures really ought to receive a suspension or something both for their ridiculous post rate (far exceeding the new rule about 2 posts per day), and also because they admit to removing attibution on purpose.

[-] c0dezer0@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago

You should look up the credit first. Has the credit similiar works? Then leave the credit untouched.

If there are no results, then someone else might be trying to "steal" the works and want to sell as their own.

Only in verified cases you should remove the incorrect credits and add the correct ones.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I actually think it's morally correct to strip stone toss or Scott Adam's names from thier works.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 days ago

Or just don't post them to begin with

[-] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I don't think it's morally correct to remove their names. People have the right to know who the artist is.

There's the old question, can you separate the art from the artist? Everyone is going to have a different opinion, and for those that say no; sharing a comic without saying who it's from doesn't allow them to decide "that's a Scott Adams comic, fuck that guy".

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
345 points (97.8% liked)

Comic Strips

23106 readers
2749 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS