I mean. There are other models that already only train on their own legally held data. Getty Images, and Shutter Stock for instance.

The main problem is that this is in direct reaction to other models scraping them for training data and them trying to monetize their own IP as a result.

I like your style.

I believe you'd need a laser or some strength, and these cameras would need to lack proper filters. I'm not saying it's not worth a shot. Just that I doubt it will be effective.

I was diagnosed with ADHD (ADD) in elementary school. Basically my entire family have ADHD or Autism or both. Diagnosed. Those who aren't diagnosed are mostly my parents age or older.

Just because something is trendy doesn't mean that the number of people with a legitimate mental illness or learning disability are any less prevalent. There's such a push to let people know these learning disabilities exist because so many people aren't diagnosed.

So what is your devils advocate stance here? That faking it harms people with the legitimate learning disabilities or mental illness?

That you just know by looking at people that they're faking it?

That giving people who say they need it more time and accomodations to complete assignments and tasks somehow harms us as a society?

Like.

You didn't even address what I asked. Which is, how do the people in the article making the claim quantify who is faking it? What is the metric they use to legitimize who has learning disabilities or mental illness?

Just giving anecdotal evidence from your own lived experience isn't a devils advocate argument in and of itself.

How did he ever think he was the exemplar human male of the species?

At a time when more people are being diagnosed with neurodivergent disabilities, how do they quantify this "fraud"?

I wish I could put Linux on my work computer.

We didn't win until I can remove it all from my computer.

Because it's renting. From every company that can get exclusivity to something you want to rent.

Oh meth, mmmmm meth!

People aren't just rejecting it and staying on 10. They are actively downgrading (going back to windows 10) or leaving the windows ecosystem entirely for Linux. Someone actually went out of their way to tally up and explain all the shit MS broke over the course of the last year. It's a ridiculous number of things.

Android has a market share of something like 42.5%. Google is adding Gemini to devices ~~I'm~~ in a way that gives Gemini core android apps permissions. Right now these settings can be changed, but the default settings give this access.

It's not just MS.