422
submitted 3 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The rate at which the U.S. military has used the Tomahawk missiles in the Iran war has reportedly prompted internal talks about increasing supplies

Some Pentagon officials are concerned about the “alarmingly low” supply of Tomahawk missiles remaining in the U.S. military’s arsenal after firing 850 of the weapons into Iran, according to a report.

The rate at which the U.S. military has used the Tomahawk missiles in President Donald Trump’s war in Iran, now in its fourth week, has prompted internal talks about increasing supplies, according to The Washington Post.

U.S. officials told the newspaper that the number of Tomahawks left in the Middle East was “alarmingly low.” Another official told the outlet that the U.S. supply of Tomahawks was closing in on “Winchester,” military slang that means almost out of ammunition.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Gork@sopuli.xyz 96 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Raytheon salesmen would like to know your location

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 84 points 3 weeks ago

They're starting to look like a waste of money that we should not replenish.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

That's sounds very unpatriotic, citizen. Are you a dirty commie?! /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 46 points 3 weeks ago

Wait, how many of those do we have? I'd expect us to have at least 10,000 given how we are supposed to be the bastion of goddamn freedom. Can hardly claim to be the stalwart defender of democracy if we don't have enough ammo for at least a month.

And if we don't have ammo, maybe we shouldn't be starting wars with nations that have a military.

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 85 points 3 weeks ago

The pentagon has been dodging audits like fucking Neo for over 50 years.

I have a hunch that a good chunk of that trillion dollars they get every year just kind of evaporates. You know, you order 8,500 tomahawks from your Raytheon buddy, he sends 850 and pockets the difference. No one questions it because surely we’re not going to get into an extended ground conflict so who’s gonna notice.

We’re probably just like the Russians, just with better advertising and fresh paint.

[-] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

~~And if we don't have ammo, maybe~~ we shouldn't be starting wars ~~with nations that have a military.~~

FTFY.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 43 points 3 weeks ago

So, apparently there's a term that's used in the defence industry for advanced, extremely capable, very expensive weapons: "exquisite weapons". This sounds like something out of a fantasy RPG, but it's actually the term they use in the industry to talk about these things, the Tomahawk being one of them.

So, while Iran is hitting various sites around the middle east with machines that cost about the same as a small car and are built in a basic factory, the US is spending 100x as much, building missiles in special high-tech factories using clean rooms and high end robots. Not only that, but the weapons the US is using to intercept Iran's drones cost about 100x as much as the drones they're shooting down.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

We have too damn much money and not nearly enough brains.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jabberwock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago

Hey now, the US has its own low-cost drone reverse engineered from an Iranian one-way attack drone.

Does that mean they'll stop building Tomahawks? Of course not, now two companies can benefit instead of one. That's 2x the military-industrial complex baby!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] j_elgato@leminal.space 35 points 3 weeks ago

Jesus... How many schools did they have??

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 3 weeks ago

Per the Wikipedia article nuclear weapons of the United states:

The US holds in total 5,177 warheads, of which 3,700 are stockpiled, and 1,477 are awaiting dismantlement. Of the stockpile, 1,770 are deployed, while 1,930 are held in reserve.

Do we seriously have more nukes than tomahawks??? This reporting has to be incorrect.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Nope. Mutual assured destruction was standard operating procedure. It is one reason the U.S.S.R. collapsed - they were trying to exceed our reserves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Well here's the thing, the article only said that our supply in the middle east is dwindling. So presumably we had about 1000 tomahawks between those two carrier groups (so I guess 500 per carrier group). I believe the US keeps 11 active carrier groups around the world, so just doing the math, that's 5500 missiles. But that's not counting any supplies held by the airforce, army or national guard (though it seems like not a very appropriate munition for the national guard, so they may not have many).

Still, I would not be surprised if the total supply in the US military is well over 5000, potentially as high as 10,000.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theblurstoftimes@leminal.space 25 points 3 weeks ago

This is like when a noob uses a cheat code at the beginning of the game and still loses

[-] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Invincibility cheat and then walk off the edge of the map so it doesn’t matter 🤣

[-] metakrakalaka@lemmychan.org 24 points 3 weeks ago

AI says these cost $1.3 million each on the low end.

That's at least another billion dollars wasted on Israel that could've been spent helping Americans.

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

I cannot imagine there’s actually $1.3M of anything in these missiles. They’re probably a few grand and then about $1.3M of mark-up.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago

It's not just what's inside them. It's the entire process of making them. There are a lot of people involved that all want to be paid for their work.

Ofc the price you sell them for is higher than the cost of making them. But they're still very expensive to make.

[-] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

It's a missile that you can fire from one country and hit a specific building in another country.

Can't just go out and put some Playstation parts and TNT into a tube and call it good. A million+ per missile makes sense.

[-] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago

As a former Gov contractor who now works for gov, yes. Price always goes up for government contracts.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

They cost closer to $4m each.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Right… that’s the concern here… dwindling supplies.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

Imagine a world where the US ran out of bombs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Spend billons on more bombs while global economic collapse looms.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 16 points 3 weeks ago

That really is the best opportunity for China to take Taiwan. Wait a little bit longer until stockpiles are empty and ground troops are deployed and then strike while the USA is occupied

[-] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Why would China bother?

China is about to become what America was: #1 country, #1 economy, with oil traded in their currency, with resources available across the globe.

China's investments in Trump are about to pay off huge.

Why fuck with a winning hand by invading a small island when they can just keep doing what they're doing, and let Taiwan make semiconductors for China, and collect all the benefits of being Top Dog?

[-] jellygoose@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

Already kinda is, it feels like.

I’m Canadian; most people here seemed extremely happy to see our PM in China making actual deals and opening up trade.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago

This is exactly from a book of Sun Zu, sit back and watch your enemies fight with each other’s and you will win without shooting a single shot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

Taiwan might be asking to join China to protect itself from perceived American aggression at this rate.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 weeks ago

Those could have been used against russia to defend Ukraine...

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

That’s what, 2.5 billion taxpayer dollars. For a war taxpayers don’t want.

Fuck Trump.

[-] azureskypirate@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago

They bombed a bunker months ago, now there's a bunch of tomahawk missles deployed; Is The Dept. of War getting ideas from Top Gun: Maverick? /s

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 3 weeks ago

Take away the /s. In the first term, Steve Mnuchin was...Treasury, I think. Anyway, he's a movie producer, on the financing side. Look up his list of credits. The things you describe sound exactly like his kinds of movies. Mnuchin was probably encouraging Trump, so he could later make a movie about it "based on a true story."

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

those are about 3 million each, in pre trump funds. Looks like tax paying Americans will all be emptying or wallets and cutting services to replace those now too. I hope Israel is happy with us and sends our politicians a tiny fraction of that amount in bribes.

Btw only 9000 tomahawk missiles have ever been produced in the 43 year lifespan of the tomahawk program, and at top speed we can produce 600 a year. We usually make up to 90 a year. We reportedly had between 3-4000 in our inventory.

[-] anugeshtu@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a gun nut or at all pro war, but why do they produce multimillion dollar missiles consisting of metal, fuel and explosives for that much for a one-way use instead of using that money to prevent wars? Well, call me a sweet summer child.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

Tomahawk missiles are meant to be used for high precision strikes, they're basically the missile equivalent of a 50. cal sniper loaded with AP-I rounds which is to say explosive but deadly if you want someone or something annihilated. Problem is they're using them like artillery or maybe a V-1 so of course it's gonna be fucking expensive for no reason, to go back to my previous analogy it's like using said sniper and ammo to hunt squirrels.

[-] quips@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

This is what scares me in a true protracted war with China. Imagine their production capacity. Even if our weapons are better, does it make a difference if they can build them 10x faster at 90% the efficacy?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

They can just get ICE to loan them some.

[-] billybob@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago

Are they doing this so they have an excuse not to help Taiwan next year?

[-] krisevol@lemmus.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

If china get Taiwan the US is going into the stone age overnight. No president is trying to avoid this, both parties want to protect Taiwan.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Once again, comedy gold for the Kremlin.

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

It’s so silly. Those were made to be used ‘surgically’: to hit specific high value targets at extended range while minimising collateral damage. If you feel the need to use 850 of them, you’ve chosen the wrong weapon system: at that point, you should be flying B52’s over whatever you want to hit. Or turn Tehran into a glass parking lot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, empty those stockpiles. Don't wowwy, nothing is going to happen, I pwomice

Gweetings, China.

[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

No more missiles until you stop bombing little girls.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
422 points (98.4% liked)

News

37285 readers
2696 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS