TBF if the reviewer just quoted Claude at me, I would reply with Claude or ChatGPT.

Thank you

this is cool

you should make a post about this somewhere here on Lemmy

people should know about it

“AI generated” means that the subject material is in whole, or in meaningful part, the output of a generative AI model or models, such as a Large Language Model. This does not include code that is the result of non-generative tools, such as standard compilers, linters, or basic IDE auto-completions. This does, however, include code that is the result of code block generators and automatic refactoring tools that make use of generative AI models.

As "artificial intelligence" is not that well defined, you could clarify what the policy defines "AI" as by specifying that "AI" involves machine learning.

I like this approach, but how can it be enforced? Would you have to read every line and listen to a gut feeling?

I see this excuse of burn out every time it comes to LLM use, but i honestly do not buy it. You cant tell me every other dev out there just burnt out at the same time in sync with the release of LLM coding assistants. If you use LLMs like this you simply dont care about the project anymore and should move on with your life. Its better for everyone if it gets abandoned by the original dev and forked by ones that care. Sometimes you just gotta let go.

There aren't better ways, not in their current forms.

What I'm wondering is, why does Vim need new features in the core repo at all?
It's finished software at this point.
The dev should just do security upgrades and let extensions developed by other people handle additional functionality.

Let's not lose focus more on the more immediate concern here, that this person is using a human pronoun to describe a computer.

Couldn’t help but notice the casual gendering of Claude to “he” as well.

"Claude" is a male given name. If you think it's actually a problem, blame Anthropic for giving their LLM a gendered name. I've never gendered AI assistants, but I'm not going to begrudge people who do when it's in the name (or in the case of old Siri, the voice, which would later be the default rather than only option).

Women named "Claude" exist, but they're staggeringly outnumbered by men to a point where most people don't even know of women named "Claude" – let alone would immediately associate it as masculine.

Or maybe, just maybe, it has a guys name.

Good Lord y'all made up since crazy shit to whine about.

Of all the problems with these things we're taking issue with the naming?

Re: Neovim

https://github.com/neovim/neovim/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#ai-assisted-work

Just use VScode, definitely no slop in there. Microslop would never

I switched to helix editor since last I saw, it appears to lack AI use. That said, Neovim isn't awful and is less enthusiastically pro-ai. Helix also still does not have a plugin system so for the time being you're kind of constrained to its built-in features and customization options

i ❤️vim. used it for some 15 years.

switched to neovim cause of firenvim which allowed me to use neovim in text areas in firefox

Reverse compression: making transmission larger (while still being lossy).

I originally meant to leave a much shorter comment; apologies.

I can't code to save my life. However I find your observation interesting. The way I see it, AI, no matter where, is eroding human to human interactions. It becomes the middleman for everything.

It's really obvious with personal research. A couple years ago if you wanted to start say, growing tomatoes in your backyard, you would have searched people's comments on a variety of media platforms, would have read a few books or blogs. You would have asked questions to a bunch of people with some experience, left a like or upvote on people posting photos of their tomatoes, you would have used your own judgement to discern what consisted good quality advice and what not.

It would have taken you days. But all that interaction is very rewarding especially for those authoring comments, blogs, books, and photos of their experiences. Because nobody makes something just to be ignored.

Now LLM does all that process for you. In a matter of seconds. And giving no feedback or interaction to anyone whose information was used. It's depressing, but I'm intrigued to see how it plays out.