309
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by SwooshBakery624@programming.dev to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

Related:

This is in a PR where Shougo, another long-time contributor, communicates entirely in walls of unparseable AI slop text: https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/19413

Thank you for the detailed feedback! I've addressed all the issues:

Thank you for the feedback! I agree that following the Vim 8+ naming convention makes sense.

Thank you for the feedback on naming!

Thanks for the suggestion! After thinking about this more, I believe repeat_set() / repeat_get() is the right choice:

Thank you for the feedback. A brief clarification.

https://hachyderm.io/@AndrewRadev/116176001750596207

@AndrewRadev@hachyderm.io

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fdnomad@programming.dev 47 points 21 hours ago

It's such a monumental waste of LLMs to include these slop phrases.

Employee 1 enters a prompt to send a slop mail that is so garbage it is unbearable to read using a brain.

So employee 2 either summarizes the slop mail using an LLM too or skips obtaining the information entirely and just goes straight to answering by prompting the next slop mail.

I wonder if that's by design - to make interacting with slop so painful that human-to-human communication will not happen without a LLM in between anymore.

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 16 hours ago

Reverse compression: making transmission larger (while still being lossy).

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 19 points 19 hours ago

I originally meant to leave a much shorter comment; apologies.

I can't code to save my life. However I find your observation interesting. The way I see it, AI, no matter where, is eroding human to human interactions. It becomes the middleman for everything.

It's really obvious with personal research. A couple years ago if you wanted to start say, growing tomatoes in your backyard, you would have searched people's comments on a variety of media platforms, would have read a few books or blogs. You would have asked questions to a bunch of people with some experience, left a like or upvote on people posting photos of their tomatoes, you would have used your own judgement to discern what consisted good quality advice and what not.

It would have taken you days. But all that interaction is very rewarding especially for those authoring comments, blogs, books, and photos of their experiences. Because nobody makes something just to be ignored.

Now LLM does all that process for you. In a matter of seconds. And giving no feedback or interaction to anyone whose information was used. It's depressing, but I'm intrigued to see how it plays out.

[-] fdnomad@programming.dev 11 points 19 hours ago

I agree. Specifically for your example I think the transformation has been going on for a while with the aggressive monitization of internet content / the ad industry and the general downfall of google search. LLMs could to be the final nail in the coffin for nieche expertise on the broader internet.

I too am curious to see how AI companies will try to overcome the lack of human generated content to train their models on.

[-] tristan@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 7 points 17 hours ago

I had this reflection 3 years ago, and I think that’s where we’re headed.

The internet is already un-useable for search without prompting an LLM to gather the info you need for you, and it’s getting worse every month.

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
309 points (95.6% liked)

Fuck AI

6368 readers
1667 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS