If that kept going I'm sure it would go "WHO HURT YOU? HELP IS AVAILABLE BUDDY"

Debatebro calling you a debatebro

toxic ex-trying-to-get-back-together vibes

Bro didn't even condemn Hamas! Not once in any of those DMs!

Love when people don't get the hint that a)I don't like them and b) I do not wish to continue the conversation

It's creepy when libs

I've honestly thought about just being like "Yeah i'm a huge fan of Hamas" if i ever end up in a argument with one of these guys. Honestly, it's not like there'd be any consequences worth noting

I tried to warn you all about the creepy-crawlies of DMs, but no one listened.

@[email protected]

I am going to argue that this narrative is nonsense. It tries to pass off as universal and eternal something that in reality is particular and ephemeral. In short: Westerners aren’t helpless innocents whose minds are injected with atrocity propaganda, science fiction-style; they’re generally smug bourgeois proletarians who intelligently seek out as much racist propaganda as they can get their hands on. This is because it fundamentally makes them feel better about who they are and how they live. The psychic and material costs are rationally worth the benefits. [...]

Let us look at a specific example. A claim like “There’s cultural genocide of Uyghurs in Xinjiang” is simply unreal to most Westerners, close to pure gibberish. The words really refer to existing entities and geographies, but Westerners aren’t familiar with them. The actual content of the utterance as it spills out is no more complex or nuanced than “China Bad,” and the elementary mistakes people make when they write out statements of “solidarity” make that much clear. This is not a complaint that these people have not studied China enough — there’s no reason to expect them to study China, and retrospectively I think to some extent it was a mistake to personally have spent so much time trying to teach them. It’s instead an acknowledgment that they are eagerly wielding the accusation like a club, that they are in reality unconcerned with its truth-content, because it serves a social purpose.

@[email protected] is a pathetic troll, just your typical pol brained shit-flinger without an ounce of integrity or political coherence

And if they're a paid propagandist they're a cheap one, literally asserted checking sources critically was "nazism", absolute bottom barrel dipshittery

The trick is to instantly recognize these scumbags and immediately clown them, cause whether they're paid or not they're all highly insecure people who measure their self-worth by an imagined proximity and loyalty to power

Im so glad I'm banned on *.ee

Debate perverts everywhere

Clearly my posting powers are inferior, for I have never once received a creepy DM from any liberals before

Jesus, I hope that poster is getting paid

lol that loser tried that with me to

cope exclamation marks

Is this @[email protected]'s alt?

Textbook example of bad faith

That was one of the more interesting specimens I've seen try to shill anticommunism in awhile.