261
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] BlindFrog@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

These tariff announcements, like last year's, seem like another scam to buy up cheapened stocks

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 96 points 1 day ago

Is the Dow low enough to prosecute child rapists now?

[-] stickly@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I guess it's like a barometer for morals: the lower it goes the bigger the storm

[-] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 22 hours ago
[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

The ones that invested in the dow

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 27 points 20 hours ago

Oh good now we can start asking about Epstein again.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 76 points 1 day ago

"600 points" is meaningless to 99.99% of people

[-] ergonomic_importer@piefed.ca 76 points 1 day ago

Well it's below 50,000 now so it must be time to panic

[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago

Yeah. But that’s only in dollars. Not points.

[-] DandomRude@piefed.social 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Has the Dow fallen enough now for the DOJ to start prosecuting pedophiles?

/s, but in itself almost not, because Bondi apparently was serious about her absurd statement in front of the the House Judiciary Committee.

[-] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

Hey! How can we talk about Epstein when the Dow Jones is below 50,000?!

[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

Gold & Silver going up up up VIX up up up

So yes people with money are panicking

[-] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 20 hours ago

Its meaningless to the .01% as well. 1.2% is an ordinary daily fluctuation.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To people reading CNBC, it isn't. They write for their audience, it's in the second sentence of the article you didn't read ("1.6%"; if you want to consume the news as a series of disconnected headlines, that's your fault and problem), and it's extremely easy to translate to a percentage.

I swear sometimes people on link aggregators like Lemmy and Reddit act like those boomers who perplexedly review services they've never used as though they think everything they see on the Internet must be personally targeted at them.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Why the fuck would I read an article about a change in a ticker?

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I swear sometimes people on link aggregators like Lemmy and Reddit act like those boomers who perplexedly review services they’ve never used as though they think everything they see on the Internet must be personally targeted at them.

Plenty of people do want to read about financial news, namely about why the ticker changed and its possible effects. If you don't, that's fine. Just check Yahoo! Finance or whatever for the ticker. Or don't. It's your life. But nobody has to or should accommodate your utter disinterest in reading anything past the headline.

[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago

Ok so now that the Dow isn’t over 50k is bondinready to release the rest of the files orrrrrr

[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Somebody needs to check with Pam Bondi about this. Apparently the Dow being below 50,000 means that President Trump needs to be investigated for raping children, according to her logic.

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Let’s see that Dow go back down to 10,000 when the world was a little more sane.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

I wonder what that would entail. It's such a drastic change that is probably something big.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Since they trim from the bottom around here, it means unless you’re a C-suite executive you’d lose everything.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

The DOW's over ~~50,000~~ ~~49,500~~ ~~49,000~~ 48,500...

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

these article are kinda funny as they treat 600 like its still 2000. Its like 1% from 50000. 2008 it went from like 12k to 6k and nearly halved. The dot com it was like 25%. The market is completely disconnected from day to day life at this point

[-] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

Market's a pump and dump now. Down 800 today, up 1200 tomorrow. Everything recovers in days or maybe weeks and always to new highs. Even covid recovered in less than a year. This is not a normal market, it's just pretending to be.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 21 hours ago

I sorta feel covid short circuited a long overdue correction that just has it being a pure fiction now. If we ever do get a real correction its going to dwarf anything historically.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

They never report these "drops" and "crashes" as percentages, as it would kill the headline. Let's talk about the percentage of the existing number that still has true value.

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
261 points (99.6% liked)

News

36063 readers
3287 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS