I'm begging liberals, think farther than one (1) presidential election into the future.

Elect the lesser evil now, by the time elections come around everyone hates him and they vote for the other guy. Then it repeats, the greater evil gets elected, everyone hates him, and so the lesser evil gets their turn. Over and over until we're all dead.

AcTuAL tRaNs PeRsOn HeRe

If I was locked in a room with Gavin Newsome, Jd Vance, and Nicholas Maduro I would shoot Vance twice , then tear Gavin Newsome apart with my bare hands.

But then they get mad when marginalized groups withhold their votes to send a message and still make smug, “you saved Gaza” comments.

I never trusted people who are deep into idpol speak. You get the feeling they’ll say some vile shit the moment you don’t align with them

Edit: that liberal is part of a Destiny group that posts racist memes about murdering Palestinians. Lmao you can always clock these virtue-signaling whites a mile away.

YOU OWE US YOUR VOTE!!! IT'S OURS!!!!!!

Here's my signal demand. Pander to me, campaign on some popular progressive idea like M4A or legal weed or some shit. You don't even have to deliver on it, you can pull an Obama. Just pretend that something will fundamentally change!

This is how low the bar is.

These "Vote Blue No Matter Who" types are the first to withhold their vote if anyone to the left of Klobuchar is on the ticket. Just look how their masks came off when Mamdani won the primary.

Kissing the feet of someone who isn't even running yet and expecting others to do the same if so weird. What up with that? Why are people like this in the US?

She is so out of touch that she thinks all he did was make a comment about sports. Meanwhile he's vetoing trans protections and personally fistfighting unhoused people.

They keep losing elections, blaming leftists for it, then putting up candidates who alienate leftists, and then yelling at leftists for not supporting their candidates. Like a never-ending cycle.

It's so telling how radlibs are constantly demanding that trans people and Palestinians just give up on their human rights to not alienate potential voters, while they're out there constantly using leftwingers as a punchingbag to vent their frustrations. Like, is attracting potential voters important now or not?

"This tactic of trying to shame and insult people into voting for someone who won't actually do anything to protect marginalised people didn't work for us last time, or the time before that, or the time before that, but it's sure to work this time!"

Gavin "Fuck the homeless" Newsome

Look, I'm as left as they come but the time to have an opinion was back when we still held primaries. You loonies need to recognize Newsome has the mandate of heaven

I'm writing in Hillary and none of you gavinbros can stop me.

when lost it hadnt even been a full day before the democrats went full "it's actually because of trans people"

i cannot fucking deal with the liberal trans with the political memory of a goldfish

God twitter is tiring, how can you put up with these babybrains and not burn out?

-> -> -> -> -> -> -> -> ->

Surely Hasan will regret voting third party after Vance narrowly defeats Newsom in the electoral college while winning California by a single vote

Dems somehow still don't understand how insufferable they sound

Hes in CA so he could vote for spongebob and it still wont matter

i just do not get it. do politics people not know how first past the post works? if everyone to the left of democrats keep voting for them while the republicans are shifting right, the democrats will shift right too to capture the "reasonable" republicans left in the middle. when you pledge your vote TWO YEARS IN ADVANCE the only thing you're doing is making it safe for the party to completely ignore you.

Instead of fixing things with ICE, he would absolutely start using it as a way to destroy homeless encampments, too.

based on your logic....your fans are in favor of dog abuse as well?

If this person had comprehension skills he'd understand Hasan's logic is the opposite of this; he just wanted to throw in the dog abuse comment really badly.

Hasan is criticizing people who blindly follow their favorite streamers, his logic is opposed to doing that.

I still strongly disagree with him on several things, but I'm pleasantly surprised he's finally moving in the direction of talking about supporting third parties after speaking so emphatically against it less than a week ago speaking to Varoufakis. I wonder what changed it for him.

Edit: Also, I forgot that some Dems unironically say verbatim "vote blue no matter who"

The only person implying they're speaking on behalf of trans people is her. Liberals cannot help but self-tokenize.

This is how trump wins a 3rd election.

There's something fascinating about the logic of these kinds of people.
If I were to suggest voting third party, they'd dismiss it as nice idea that was impossible because "noone would vote for them."
Yet when they are told someone won't vote for their candidate, then that is an indictment of the voter and not a sign to change strategy. I remember last election running into that paradox with many users on here, and they were always completely oblivious to it.

"Your candidate won't win, people are unwilling to vote for them."
"Okay, but I won't vote for Newsom and neither will anyone else."
"Nooo you have to vote for him!"

Are you going to commit to making the candidate someone whom people will actually vote for?