418

While the New Mexico Department of Health said it can't pinpoint the baby's exact cause of death, officials believe it could have been linked to the mother's drinking raw milk during pregnancy.

Health officials in New Mexico are warning against consuming raw dairy products after a newborn baby in the state died from a listeria infection that they say was likely contracted when the baby's mother drank raw milk during pregnancy.

The New Mexico Department of Health in a news release said that officials believe the mother consumed unpasteurized milk while pregnant, which could have led to the listeria infection.

Officials cannot pinpoint the exact source of the listeria that led to the baby's death, the release said, but it noted that "the tragic death underscores the serious risks raw dairy poses to pregnant women, young children, elderly New Mexicans and anyone with a weakened immune system."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

No shit.

If Conservatives want to poison themselves with raw milk, get on with it. But keep kids out of your performative bullshit.

[-] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

My MAGA sister says that raw milk isn't dangerous. So, fake news?

How did we get here? Fkin hell!

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

How? Decades of Republicans cheapening public education, that's how. We are becoming that dystopian society Carl Sagan spoke of, where science has been replaced by magic.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Because of the typical incomplete and cherrypicked argument they cite that people get sick and die from pasteurized milk anyway.

While it’s completely true that people do get sick from outbreaks in pasteurized milk over time, there is no perfect system, the millions and millions of people who consume pasteurized dairy vs the thousands that dare to drink unpasteurized milk per capita objectively and obviously wildly points out that pasteurized is ridiculous orders of magnitude safer than raw milk.

But in typical willfully ignorant fashion, they ignore the science and dive into some nebulous and BS health benefits of raw milk while ignoring the game of death roulette they play.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

because in the 90s we started teaching people that their feelings are the truth, rather than mostly stupid and wrong.

if there is anything in common with ignorant fools it's that they think their feelings is the only measure of things, and truth and knowledge is just a feeling they feel like any other.

i was lucky enough to learn in school that my feelings are stupid and wrong and they need to be verified before i can trust them and that other people know more about things than i do. but i'm part of the homosexual queertrans agenda like that.

[-] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm very glad the milk my Mom, my older sibling and I drink is pasteurized

[-] splashgarden@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago

I just can't understand this movement... I can't wrap my head around why cooking your milk before drinking it makes it bad!!!! I thought the anti-vaccination people were going to be as bad as it gets regarding science denial but it just keeps getting worse 😭😭

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

You want to see worse? Google "raw water movement." Fuggin' scary people.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It mainly has to do with an enzyme that exists in the milk (and helps digest the milk) but breaks down from heat, and then this is blamed for gut issues (and gut issues are pretty common these days and hard to pinpoint the cause of, so people will latch on to anything to try to solve the issue).

I'm not sure about the accuracy of that enzyme thing, that's just the information that had me wondering about raw milk.

It's completely perpendicular to whether or not there's any harmful bacteria in the milk (other than cooking gets rid of both), which means getting sick from raw milk isn't guaranteed, which then makes it go through the same pathways gambling does (and we're notoriously bad at risk assessment in gambling), so some people with gut issues (especially if it actually does help, though I bet many build the habit of getting raw milk without even confirming it does help and just keep the habit going because they feel like they are sticking it to the man) ignore that a recurring low chance of something has an increased chance of running into it over time.

Ultimately, laziness won out for me and I never bothered trying to find a source of raw milk when I was interested in the idea, though I can't say I ever really fully bought into it as I knew that even if pasturization was more necessary because of unhygienic milk industry practices, it was still being done for a reason.

But ultimately, both this and the anti-vaccine movement are about people losing trust in this corporate-dominated system, which I can't really call irrational on its own, even if it leads to some irrational conclusions. It wasn't that long ago that cigarette companies were sponsoring "smoking is great" propaganda, and later "smoking isn't that bad". And the opioid crisis didn't do anything to help credibility since doctors were pushing addictive drugs marketed as not addictive because they were getting kickbacks from the manufacturers.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It's going to get worse every day, and every day we're all going to get used to sharing a country with a population who have been essentially lobotomized by capital until we give up fighting, because outside influences are oozing through our every media feed and atomized algorithm pushing whatever radical slop it can to make us all divided and dumber with no attention spans and crippling social anxiety so nobody is able to enforce the ONLY thing that keeps populations caring about reason and facts: social pressure.

Social pressure is the only thing that's ever worked to make people want to be smarter and make right choices, and when you get rid of community, you get rid of people's need to belong to a better tribe, so everyone retreats to their online, AI-nurtured spaces to be coddled and sold new products.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

A few prior stories on raw milk in the bottom of this article...

https://www.wonkette.com/p/gee-it-doesnt-seem-like-this-raw

[-] inspector_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

“While authorities can’t pinpoint the exact cause of death…”

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago
[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 25 points 18 hours ago

Hmmm it’s kind of like the exact same reason we started pasteurizing in the first place.

[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 6 points 16 hours ago

Pasteurization? That's UNNATURAL! No one wants all that done to their milk. They want it RAW!

Yea, most of these RAW milk people dont realize its basically just low temperature boiling. They think they are adding acid or antibiotics or soething.

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I was briefly interested in raw milk in the early 2000s. There was a lot of info floating around about how pasteurization destroyed beneficial bacteria that healthy people could benefit from, to avoid risk to those with compromised immune systems, infants and elderly, etc. The gut microbiome was just starting to be talked about, and we didn't know much, but people were curious about improving it.

Fortunately I did a little digging and realized it was a fairly radical and unproven concept, but it's not just the belief they're adding something harmful. It's the belief they're removing beneficial bacteria that would somehow improve our health.

Considering how the last 20 years have been full of mostly unproven probiotic and prebiotic marketing insanity, it's not surprising, it's the same base concept. But science has been demonized since then, people actively think science and medicine is trying to keep us unhealthy now, and the top levels of government are promoting that bullshit.

[-] mack7400@piefed.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

They prefer their milk darwinized.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

they think

you give em too much credit

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

I'm just surprised raw milk wasn't at the top of RFK jr's upside down pyramid.

L.monocytogenes has the big issues of needing very few active colonies to cause trouble, especially to kids. It could trigger an infection so easily and across such a huge range of foodstuff and products or even basic ingredients that it's scary.

Now, thankfully, modern science (10000 bC ~ today) found out that heat deals with such things just fine. Especially since a guy named Pasteur understood that a mild thermic process might be enough to deactivate most patogens. Even better yet more people later on found out that high temperature can even destroy most pathogens if applied for a rational number of cicles and time. Not enough to damage the nutritional properties. Just about enough to do what the doom guy does with these demons to the pathogens and other microbes.

Turns out drinking untreated food products is severly dangerous. When and where did this trend start.

[-] fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

This seems to be another example of people not understanding the most basic exponential function.

If you have 3% listeria... And it doubles every minute. In 5 minutes you have full-blown listeria and you're dead....

[-] madjo@piefed.social 86 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If only we had a way to remove dangerous bacteria from milk. We could name it after its inventor... /sarcasm.

On the other hand, this is survival of the fittest. If you're willing to take risks with your foetus' health by drinking unpasteurized milk, maybe you shouldn't be a parent...

[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

To all the people defending raw milk because it doesn't have chemicals added: heating up milk also doesn't have chemicals in it.

I look forward to complaints from the raw chicken lovers.

[-] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 4 points 19 hours ago

I'd like to state that milk DOES have chemicals in it, just typically not added ones.

[-] Sabin10@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago

The funny part is that some people in the raw milk community have started heating the milk before consumption to reduce the risk of illness. They swear its not pasteurization though, that's something different and bad.

[-] splashgarden@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago

I'm going to lose my mind

[-] madjo@piefed.social 24 points 1 day ago

Can't fix stupid, I guess. These are the same people that would fall for the "there's chemicals in water, called DHMO!" meme.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

This isn’t survival of the fittest. Not one baby in human history was responsible for their own fitness or survival. This is survival of the poorly educated, poorly resourced, poorly connected communities. They’re trying to make ends meet with a baby, and unfortunately they couldn’t do that in a safe manner. It’s a tragedy, a hallmark of human life.

[-] madjo@piefed.social 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The baby hadn't been born yet. The would-be mother drank unpasteurized "raw" milk.

That's not a case of being poor or poorly resourced. It's a lot harder to source unpasteurized milk than it is to find milk that is safe to drink. You have to really go out of your way to buy that!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Klox@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Personally I think we'll continue to have problems if misinformation is never found culpable of the deaths that they cause. There's no way this person decided to drink unpasteurized milk alone. Who was her community and why aren't they being held accountable? I have the same concerns with the head of the HHS, and previous cases of stochastic terrorism. Our system of justice (or what it once was...) is just illprepared for this.

[-] duelistsage@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago

Yeah, the problem is these people bond over being ignorant pieces of shit.

It gets to the point where everyone is supposed to know the "meta" information and anyone who tries to be serious about something is ridiculed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Will the dumbfuck MAGA mom be charged with murder?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago

Raw milk, it's the new abortion drug of choice. Now fully legal and endorsed by conservatives!!!

[-] Eh_I@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Pro-infanticide bumper stickers in '28

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

There should be much higher safety testing requiremnts for raw milk if people are going to sell it in stores. Every raw milk outlet should need to hire a microbiologist to ship it offsite.

I can't fathom a reason why pasteurization shouldn't be required.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Same, but source contol is a real method that works for this kind of thing when done well.

Europe does source control with eggs. By very strictly monitoring sources they can prevent outbreaks and don't need to soak eggs in a chlorine solution like we do here.

This is probably why people apply a similar logic to pasteurization. Pasteurization is a heat process for milk and therefore far less of a problem than egg chlorination baths (which notably puts organohalides into the drainwater which may or may not degrade before going elsewhere.)

What shouldn't be allowed is not fucking doing any kind of process to reduce infections and letting people get sick. Especially because healthcare is privatized here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

I can’t fathom a reason why pasteurization shouldn’t be required.

some fancy old fashioned dairy products which I cannot name need some of the microbes in raw milk to be made.

It should be a fucking hobbyist product, and sold at specialised stores, not in fucking "tescos" or whatever the yankee equivalent is.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

what's the RFK death toll now? Must be in the hundreds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I still think we should take the warning labels off of things and let the problem sort itself out.

If we can thin our own herd let's go ahead and do it.

[-] lemmylump@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

If you're going to listen to a fucking moron who ate road kill and got a portion of his brain EATEN BY A WORM THEN YOU DESERVE WHATEVER THE FUCK HAPPENS TO YOU OR YOUR FAMILY.

FUCK ALL OF THESE PEOPLE!

Sorry, an innocent child died , personally I think the parents should be prosecuted harshly, BUT FUCK ALL THESE STUPID PEOPLE.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
418 points (99.3% liked)

News

35349 readers
2605 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS