148

And remember that they'll shoot you no matter what you do.

Just some unrelated info that might be interesting to people

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] videogame@hexbear.net 77 points 1 month ago

It's illegal to say: "People should set up sniper nests and pick off these oafish cretins one by one"

But it was okay for me to say it right then because I was just telling you it's illegal to say

[-] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago
[-] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[-] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

Took ya long enough side-eye-1 side-eye-2

[-] bdonvr 14 points 1 month ago

That would be illegal to say.

I don't think it would be illegal to say that if you did do that and got killed after taking several I'd totally go to your wake.

[-] Mindfury@hexbear.net 35 points 1 month ago

in before the lock on this incredibly good post

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago

IT WOULD CERTAINLY BE A SHAME if anything were to happen to ICE while all this CATASTROPHIC ICE STORMING is going on that would render them UNABLE TO FLEE OR BE RELIEVED BY EXTERNAL REINFORCEMENTS were they to suddenly come under DURESS

[-] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Tbh the urban design of most of the US is basically perfect to ambush groups walking down the streets. Big, mostly empty streets surrounded by one or two story houses that are typically above street level and easy to exit the sides or rear or get off the roof.

Two riflemen crossfiring could decimate a squad and be out the back door before anyone knew what happened. Even just a lone shooter with trigger discipline could do a lot of damage. I've always been surprised it doesn't happen at all.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 29 points 1 month ago

No fed posting but all those dorks just standing in close groups while their victims are prone 🤔

[-] dead@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago

The word open-carry is exactly what it sounds like. It means that you have to display that you are carrying the weapon. For the non-US, the logic behind the law was that openly holding a gun meant that you weren't trying to commit any crimes. If you hide your gun, people thought you were trying commit a crime.

It is illegal to conceal a gun without a license. In order to be doing "open-carry", your gun must be visible to the people around you. If you hide that you are carrying a gun, that is considered illegal.

Also you need to have a permit to do open carry in Minnesota, Minnesota is one of the few states that requires you to have a license to do open carry.

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago

Pretti was licensed, not that the punishment for having a gun when you're not supposed to is summary execution.

[-] dead@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

My comment is not about Pretti. My comment is replying to a post telling people to find "vantage points and cover".

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

in the context of getting to a vantage point, carry laws don't always apply to disassembled or packaged firearms. I wouldn't go from the sporting goods store to the bank, but the law accommodates driving home or to the range etc.

also if someone is doing their best miss pavlichenko i'm not sure they're worried about carry laws anymore.

[-] CHOPSTEEQ@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Small correction, it’s not illegal to conceal without a permit everywhere in the US. FL for example now allows anyone to do so, if they meet all the requirements to get the permit.

[-] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago

ICE to see you chavez-guns

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

lots of clock towers and book depositories in a city

[-] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

The countryside surrounds the cities

[-] THEPH0NECOMPANY@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

At first I was wondering why something like this hasn't happened yet, because it would almost certainly work and if someone did do this they personally could probably get away with it.

Thing is ICE is basically always surrounded by community members that are doing surveillance on them and in the event of something happening would certainly fire into the crowd of civilians. Not to mention that the most vulnerable in the community would end up suffering the most from state retaliation.

People are starting to arm up and tensions are running high so it might happen anyway, but if someone were to plan this kind of thing out there are a lot of problems with adventurism like that

[-] mattyroses@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 month ago
[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

If ICE agents started getting shot from snipers, it would crush their morale

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
148 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14285 readers
723 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS