125

Good chance this isn't actually real, but it feels real at least in spirit

https://www.reddit.com/r/confession/comments/1q1mzej/im_a_developer_for_a_major_food_delivery_app_the/

Full text in spoiler

spoilerI'm posting this from a library Wi-Fi on a burner laptop because I am technically under a massive NDA. I don’t care anymore. I put in my two weeks yesterday and honestly, I hope they sue me. I’ve been sitting on this for about eight months, just watching the code getting pushed to production, and I can’t sleep at night knowing I helped build this machine.

You guys always suspect the algorithms are rigged against you, but the reality is actually so much more depressing than the conspiracy theories. I’m a backend engineer. I sit in the weekly sprint planning meetings where Product Managers (PMs) discuss how to squeeze another 0.4% margin out of "human assets" (that’s literally what they call drivers in the database schemas). They talk about these people like they are resource nodes in a video game, not fathers and mothers trying to pay rent.

First off, the "Priority Delivery" is a total scam. It was pitched to us as a "psychological value add." Like I said in the title, when you pay that extra $2.99, it changes a boolean flag in the order JSON, but the dispatch logic literally ignores it. It does nothing to speed you up.

We actually ran an A/B test last year where we didn't speed up the priority orders, we just purposefully delayed non-priority orders by 5 to 10 minutes to make the Priority ones "feel" faster by comparison. Management loved the results. We generated millions in pure profit just by making the standard service worse, not by making the premium service better.

But the thing that actually makes me sick—and the main reason I’m quitting—is the "Desperation Score." We have a hidden metric for drivers that tracks how desperate they are for cash based on their acceptance behavior.

If a driver usually logs on at 10 PM and accepts every garbage $3 order instantly without hesitation, the algo tags them as "High Desperation." Once they are tagged, the system then deliberately stops showing them high-paying orders. The logic is: "Why pay this guy $15 for a run when we know he’s desperate enough to do it for $6?" We save the good tips for the "casual" drivers to hook them in and gamify their experience, while the full-timers get grinded into dust.

Then there is the "Benefit Fee." You’ve probably seen that $1.50 "Regulatory Response Fee" or "Driver Benefits Fee" that appeared on your bill after the recent labor laws passed. The wording is designed to make you feel like you're helping the worker.

In reality, that money goes straight to a corporate slush fund used to lobby against driver unions. We have a specific internal cost center for "Policy Defense," and that fee feeds directly into it. You are literally paying for the high-end lawyers that are fighting to keep your delivery guy homeless.

And regarding tips, we're essentially doing Tip Theft 2.0. We don't "steal" them legally anymore because we got sued for that. Instead, we use predictive modeling to dynamically lower the base pay.

If the algo predicts you are a "high tipper" and you’ll likely drop $10, it offers the driver a measly $2 base pay. If you tip $0, it offers them $8 base pay just to get the food moved. The result is that your generosity isn't rewarding the driver; it’s subsidizing us. You’re paying their wage so we don't have to.

I'm drunk and I'm angry. Ask me anything before this gets taken down.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] TheSpectreOfGay@hexbear.net 34 points 1 month ago

none of this would surprise me if it was true, so sounds legit enough for me

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

/r/confessions, much like all the other major long text post storytelling subreddits such as /r/AITA, /r/TIFU, /r/AmIOverreacting, should be taken with a huge grain of salt. You can pretty easily notice suspicious trends among most of the top posts: a lot of the tells of AI writing, the context of the post being strange and seemingly engineered to get attention (see how this one talks about OOP being drunk in a cafe on a laptop typing this long post; that's a lot of emdashes to type on a laptop!), and lots of information that seems unlikely to be accessible/easily recalled to the OOP. How would they know the breakdown of where each part of the fees goes?

Anyway, when our turn comes there shall be no excuses for the terror etc.

[-] LisaTrevor@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

honestly I figured it was fake simply because they don't name the company. if you're drunk, angry, quitting, and taunting them into suing, you might as well leak some code and give a name

[-] XiaCobolt@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago

I think this is both entirely fake and still probably true.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

Yeah all this stuff has been known for a while so it's almost certainly true, but this person could have just copied it from existing reports.

[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

Reality is usually worse than what you can possibly think of. Crapitalists are fucking monsters. They are hired because they have the psycological illness of not feeling remorese for their actions,

Empathy is the profit killer. That is the mantra in that world. Those who begin to show empathy are quickly mocked, ridiculed, and discarded. They justify it as "well we're legally obligated to maximize shareholder value". I.e. their own value. So if the board or major shareholders find a crackpot way of fucking over the people for a cent and the executives don't do it out of princapal, they get replaced.

The entire corporate culture in this country is coked up cooked and broken. There is no social contract anymore.

[-] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago

I always assumed that this works exactly like this.

[-] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

NYC mandated something along the lines of delivery drivers having a higher minimum wage based on inflation so that legal battle's probably what they're trying to fund (I think it's like 22/ hour now), but that was years ago I think. There was some injunction and legal fuckery but it did actually make it through.

[-] Carl@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

CA has drivers paid above minimum wage, but it still works out terribly because you only get paid for the minutes when you actually have a passenger or food in your vehicle, and not the time you spend sitting around waiting. In my experience a driver makes about $20/hour, up to $30 during peak hours, and on holidays you can get one or two hours that hit $50 or so - but that is after tips and before expenses, factor those in and your average is more like $10, and the temporary peaks above that do not make up for it.

[-] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

I think I just assumed this. Tip your driver if you want them to treat you right

[-] comfy@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If it was true, it would be horrendous security practices. Learn how to actually be anonymous if you ever need to be, or know someone who can help. Stop snitching on yourself.

[-] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

A Reddit link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.

this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
125 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14285 readers
749 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS