172
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I wonder what it's like being an investor in one of these companies. You're watching them shovel mountains of money into the AI furnace, with literally no profit to show for it, but the stock keeps going up. What's your "get out before the whole thing collapses" number? I mean, there must be some voice at the back of your mind going, "This is unsustainable."

Tech bros and their sycophants have started saying things like "the old rules don't apply anymore." That also happened in 2007-2008. That also happened just before the dotcom bubble burst. That happens before every pie-in-the-sky idea that takes over the economy but has no actual plan for profitability finally burns out.

So what's your get-out number, investor guys?

[-] evenglow@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

There is no get out number. That's the whole point.

This is not an investment. It's a bet on a company not finishing the race dead last. There has never been a push for AI and androids like this. Never. The bets will keep happening until there is a winner.

Right now China is winning because all the chips used for betting are made in China from rare earth metals. The actual stuff that keeps modern society functional. Not stock market speculation.

I don't think that all of them are looking to get out, I think that a lot of people are just dumb enough to expect unbounded growth.

Look at the Tesla money they are so desperate to throw at Musk.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The AI investor pitch is one of existential risk. "This industry will eventually erase every other. Every investment you have will be made worthless by this one technology."

The way the average investor sees it, when you have a pitch like that, it becomes irrational not to invest. If you're even 10% sure they're right, you have to hedge.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Unless you know your history and recognize that every single time one of these fantasies takes over the economy, the failure to actually, y'know, be a profitable business ultimately dooms it.

[-] whichdokta@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago

It is also the pitch of every grifter that has ever walked god's green earth.

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

If you look at major hardware vendors that support AI like Dell, HPe, NetApp, Cisco, etc. They've been more or less flat since August. That also includes NVIDIA. Up and down but not actually blowing up, even though they are all the horsepower behind the cloud/AI. I saw that as the ominous sign that we've peaked

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

I am not a professional, but after one more bull cycle I am out.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 32 points 4 months ago

I love how more money is being put into AI than any industry in history and yet it provides no manufactured goods, just a whole bunch of promises and broken services.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The benefit isn't for you. The benefit is for the weapons and surveillance manufacturers who work for fascists

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Don't forget shareholders

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago
[-] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 14 points 4 months ago

boom = bubble

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago
[-] flowers_galore2@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 4 months ago

Isn’t it grand, scammers raise close to useless companies, pull “valuations” out of their arses and get boatloads of money from investors, based on those faerie numbers to literally burn the planet with. Then, with the overpriced stock they “invest” in each other, pumping the money round and value even more up. And they, let’s not forget, then capex the fuck out of each other as well. I forgot where I was trying to go with this, but I think it won’t matter much anyway.

[-] Jerkface@piefed.social 4 points 4 months ago

"AI bust subtracts more than a trillion dollars from wealth of US tech barons in 2026"

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

AI bust subtracts 100s of thousands of jobs and a $4 trillion bailout package paid for by the taxpayers as foreclosures reach record highs, people are being disappeared in record numbers, a hundred million people are starving, the democratic party has been deported, and the ufc is providing the circus live from the grand octagon, Venezuela has been invaded, and a carrier fleet is approaching Greenland, and people wonder 'is this the line' and do nothing still, and the tech barons buy all your property and everywhere is company town, in 2026.

[-] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Wellcome to the acceleration of the death cult economy

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago
[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz -1 points 4 months ago

"Add" is a peculiar word here, you might as well say I "add" to conversations if we are going to start stretching words like taffy.

this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
172 points (98.3% liked)

News

37401 readers
1640 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS