347
That’s a fucking nightmare. Definitely in my top fears, waking up on a surgery table
Not just the surgery table, but the organ harvesting table.
Kentucky organization allegedly began harvesting organs from people who may not have been dead.
No shit
How else can you guarantee freshness?
Makes me reconsider being an organ donor. They were trying to "euthanize" him to sell his organs. This was attempted murder for profit.
The sad thing is we desperately need people to stay organ donors if organ transplants that save lives are to stay a thing and these ethical catastrophes that should lead to mass arrests instead end with people leaving the registry and seemingly 0 consequences for the ghouls that caused the issue…
It’s not unlikely this will cause shortages for people in need that was completely preventable due to greed and capitalism.
Spot on. I've had my donor registration sitting on my desk for the last few years, and I've been deliberating on it because I don't trust capitalism not to create perverse incentives and do fucked up shit just like this.
That, and I don't want my remains to just be a tool to help fund some CEO's yacht.
Reading this, I feel even more justified in my concern, and it definitely could affect my ultimate decision.
If you've had it for years sitting there you where never going to sign it.
Not only that but the reduction in organ supply will be a windfall for shareholders! I see this as an absolute win! USA, USA!
Oh common, there are plenty of murder attempts at you for profit!
i once posted a question on another forum a while ago about organ donation, what if we can decide which organs go to which persons, so it would mitigate some of these issues,
If you can decide where your organs go, wouldn't you decide to keep them for yourself? Dude wasn't brain dead they say..
This is a rash conclusion to jump to
What other conclusion is there?
That it would be horrible to deny people a chance at life because you read a shitty clickbait article
I have heard other anecdotes of doctors pushing families into cutting support so they can use the organs. Seems plausible to me
Yes this sort of bullshit is why lots of people die needlessly. Some lie that a friend of a friend supposedly "knew". It's conspiracy nonsense that would only ever make a shred of sense if the doctor pushing for it personally knew the recipient and also knew they were a match. Not saying it's never happened but calling it dubious is too kind.
Read the article. It was plainly stated, that's why I put euthanize in quotations as that was the terminology used by the staff attempting to murder him.
Then that is a shit-ass article not worth my time. Pretty obvious no one would admit to doing that if they were. What the hell is wrong with you to believe that?
You're a rude piece of shit, fuck off.
Look who is talking, psycho. Lol "they were euthanizing these people!!111"
"I'm not dead yet!"
He says he's not dead.
That's terrifying, sounds like it'd happen in a FNAF book. Think it has actually.
Waking up, look at them removing your lungs "I'm not done using those"
Just capitalism things. I hate what they’ve done to this country.
Happens in capitalist china too
I mean, it's almost like regardless of the economic, political, religious (etc.) framework they're operating within bad people will do bad things to one another for personal gain or something.
Yup
But bad systems create the incentives. Chalking it up to "bad people doing bad things" is a shallow analysis that does nothing to address the underlying problem. If you replaced all the "bad people" with "good people" you would see the same problems re-emerge due to the perverse incentives created by the profit motive.
I don't know why there are never any business school shooters (I mean obviously it's because people who go to them are out to take as much for themselves as possible, but you know what I mean)
That’s actually a good point, even if a bit macabre. Luigi took out a health insurance ghoul. Business majors doom us all. I’m not the only one to draw that conclusion.
I dont see a way out of this mess without people dying so I dont let myself have a gun. But not everyone who thinks this way places the same shackles on themselves.
So why isnt that more common?
If anyone would like to learn more about the powers that be that resulted in this disaster, here's an article that goes over how the orgs that manage organ donation, inducing pressure on medical staff and introduce a conflict of interest.
Are organs from people dead for overdose useful? I would guess they would be full of drugs or other damage.
My guess would be that some may not be viable because of certain drugs but that doesn't mean all of them are. You probably wouldn't want the liver of a heavy drinker but thier lungs are probably fine?
If it's a question between a slightly cirrhosis liver or no liver at all? Wouldn't it be better to get the alcoholic liver?
eBay at it again. Silly!
’90s eBay was wild
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
347 points (98.1% liked)
News
37251 readers
2748 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS