89
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

I'm a fan of the YouTuber "andrewism", who regularly makes videos on an anarchist solar punk society. I don't think he supports solar punk just as an aesthetic, but believes it's legitimately part of what an ideal and egalitarian society would look like, alongside other concepts he's discussed like library economies.

I don't think solar punk is idealist either. Idealism doesn't just mean it's still just a concept, or that people want to use it as a goal. Solar punk is materialist because it describes a society that reproduces the values that sustain it, like land stewardship and collectivism. It describes a super structure with communal control of resources, which then does the whole self reinforcement with the base (which, admittedly, solarpunk also describes). It's not just the aesthetic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

And here I thought the low population bit was supposed to be because technology and decentralization allows humanity to spread out and higher standards of living and education being the birth rate down 🤔 I guess either way we're making a lot of assumptions about a hypothetical commercial like future aesthetics....

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

the only thing we have now that i think would impact birth rates in a high-tech socialist future is low infant mortality.

pretty much everything else that pressures people to have kids or not have kids is rooted in patriarchal religion and the capitalist hellscape. Who knows what people would do without losing career prospects to raise children, without god telling them to be fruitful and multiply, without despairing climate change, and without the imposition of the nuclear family? hell maybe the population would even go up more.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This thing had 3 comments when I went to bed. Did Yogthos rile up the libs again?

EDIT: Nope, just another struggle session.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
89 points (91.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13934 readers
660 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS